Hospital Profile

Lakewood Ranch Medical Center

8330 Lakewood Ranch Blvd
Bradenton, FL 34202
★★★★☆
4/5 CMS Overall Rating
120
Licensed Beds
Acute Care
Hospital Type
388
Affiliated Doctors
Moderate
Critical Care
1.2:1
Nurse-to-Bed Ratio
Data Source: Hospital data from CMS Hospital Compare (February 2026) and Provider of Services file (Q4 2025). Doctor affiliations from CMS Physician Compare. Quality measures are updated quarterly.
Reviewed by: Wes Ward, Founder & Data Lead • View our methodology

Hospital Details

Lakewood Ranch Medical Center is a 4.00-star acute care hospital located in Bradenton, Florida with 120 licensed beds. As a for-profit facility, it operates with a different financial structure than non-profit hospitals in the region.

A 4-star CMS rating places Lakewood Ranch Medical Center above the national average for overall quality. 388 physicians are affiliated with this facility, and it provides emergency services. Its critical care footprint covers 4 of 8 unit types (Moderate) with a 1.2:1 nurse-to-bed ratio.

Hospital Type Acute Care Hospitals
Ownership Proprietary
Teaching Status Non-Teaching Hospital

Quality Ratings & Measures

CMS evaluates hospitals across five quality domains. Here's how Lakewood Ranch Medical Center compares:

4
Overall Rating
of 5 stars
💔
Same as National
Mortality
0 of 6 better
🛡️
Better than National
Safety
1 of 7 better
🔄
Same as National
Readmission
1 of 8 better
😊
All 8 domains reported
Patient Experience
8 measures
💰
1.0900
Medicare Spending Index (MSPB)
Above National Avg (Higher Spending)

Quality data from CMS Hospital Compare. "Better than national" means statistically significantly better than the national average. Spending uses the CMS MSPB measure (Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary) index, where 1.000 is national average and values above/below 1.000 indicate higher/lower spending.

Patient Experience (HCAHPS Survey)

The HCAHPS survey is a standardized, national survey of hospital patients. It measures how patients perceive their care — including communication with doctors and nurses, responsiveness of staff, cleanliness, and discharge information. Higher percentages indicate better performance.

MeasureScoreStar Rating
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Always" clean71%N/A
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Sometimes" or "Never" clean10%N/A
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Usually" clean19%N/A
Cleanliness - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Cleanliness - star ratingNot Applicable%★★★☆☆ (3)
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" communicated well75%N/A
Nurse communication - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well6%N/A
Nurse communication - star ratingNot Applicable%★★☆☆☆ (2)
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" communicated well19%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" communicated well73%N/A
Doctor communication - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well9%N/A
Doctor communication - star ratingNot Applicable%★★☆☆☆ (2)
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" communicated well18%N/A
Patients who reported that staff "Always" explained about medicines before giving it to them56%N/A
Communication about medicines - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Patients who reported that staff "Sometimes" or "Never" explained about medicines before giving it to them25%N/A
Communication about medicines - star ratingNot Applicable%★★☆☆☆ (2)
Patients who reported that staff "Usually" explained about medicines before giving it to them19%N/A
Discharge information - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Patients who reported that NO, they were not given information about what to do during their recovery at home16%N/A
Discharge information - star ratingNot Applicable%★★★☆☆ (3)
Patients who reported that YES, they were given information about what to do during their recovery at home84%N/A
Patients who reported that NO, they did not discuss whether they would need help after discharge17%N/A
Patients who reported that YES, they did discuss whether they would need help after discharge83%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" explained things in a way they could understand67%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand10%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand23%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" listened carefully to them70%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them9%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" listened carefully to them21%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect80%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect6%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect14%N/A
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 6 or lower on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)12%N/A
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 7 or 8 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)22%N/A
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 9 or 10 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)66%N/A
Overall hospital rating - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Overall hospital rating - star ratingNot Applicable%★★★☆☆ (3)
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" communicated what the medication was for70%N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated what the medication was for13%N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" communicated what the medication was for.17%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" explained things in a way they could understand70%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand7%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand23%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" listened carefully to them72%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them7%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" listened carefully to them21%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect82%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect4%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect14%N/A
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Always" quiet at night49%N/A
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Sometimes" or "Never" quiet at night15%N/A
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Usually" quiet at night36%N/A
Quietness - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Quietness - star ratingNot Applicable%★★☆☆☆ (2)
Patients who reported NO, they would probably not or definitely not recommend the hospital9%N/A
Patients who reported YES, they would definitely recommend the hospital66%N/A
Recommend hospital - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Patients who reported YES, they would probably recommend the hospital25%N/A
Recommend hospital - star ratingNot Applicable%★★★☆☆ (3)
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" discussed possible side effects41%N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" discussed possible side effects37%N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" discussed possible side effects22%N/A
Summary star ratingNot Applicable%★★☆☆☆ (2)
Patients who reported that NO, they did not receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge15%N/A
Patients who reported that YES, they did receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge85%N/A

Survey response rate: 25% (1479 surveys completed). Data from 04/01/2024 to 03/31/2025 .

Services & Specialties

Lakewood Ranch Medical Center offers the following services based on CMS Provider of Services data:

Emergency & Critical Care

Lakewood Ranch Medical Center offers 4 of 8 possible critical care capabilities, classified as Moderate. Moderate critical care (3–5 unit types) covers many common emergencies but may require transfers for specialized trauma, burns, or pediatric/neonatal intensive care. Consider whether your likely health needs are covered.

🚨 Emergency Department
🏥 Intensive Care Unit (ICU)
🔬 Surgical ICU
❤️ Coronary Care Unit (CCU)

Surgical Services

🏥 Inpatient Surgery
🏢 Outpatient Surgery
🧠 Neurosurgery
💓 Cardiac Catheterization Lab
👁️ Ophthalmic Surgery

Specialty Services

🤰 Obstetrics (OB)
👶 Neonatal Nursery
🌬️ Respiratory Care

Service availability is self-reported by the facility. Confirm specific services directly with the hospital. Use our printable question list to prepare for the conversation.

Bed Count, Capacity & Staffing

Lakewood Ranch Medical Center has 120 licensed beds (120 Medicare-certified) with a nurse-to-bed ratio of 1.2:1. Higher ratios generally indicate more nursing staff per patient, which research links to better outcomes in medication errors, patient falls, and response times.

Bed Type Count
Total Licensed Beds120
CMS Certified Beds120
Staffing snapshot: 388 affiliated physicians • 147 registered nurses

Doctors Affiliated with Lakewood Ranch Medical Center

388 physicians are affiliated with Lakewood Ranch Medical Center, including 82 surgeons. Doctor affiliations are sourced from CMS Physician Compare data and indicate physicians who have a formal relationship with this hospital.

388
Total Doctors
99
Procedural Specialists
82
Surgeons

Featured Affiliated Physicians

Bahram Ahmadi
Upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy for acid reflux
NPI: 1003849001
Ronald Andari Sawaya
Upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy for acid reflux
NPI: 1538473897
Kinan Rahal
Upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy for acid reflux
NPI: 1639278708
Ngoc-Lam M. Nguyen
Spinal fusion
NPI: 1508181769
Arun P. Khazanchi
Upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy for acid reflux
NPI: 1003961236
Robert J. Summerlee
Upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy for acid reflux
NPI: 1174596050

Showing 388 of 388 affiliated physicians. Doctor affiliations from CMS Physician Compare data.

Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAI)

Healthcare-associated infections are one of the most important safety metrics when evaluating a hospital. These infections are acquired during a hospital stay, not the reason for admission. CMS tracks rates for specific infection types and compares each hospital to the national benchmark.

Infection TypeScore (SIR)vs. National
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence LimitN/ANo Different than National Benchmark
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit2.756No Different than National Benchmark
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection: Number of Device Days1150No Different than National Benchmark
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases1.087No Different than National Benchmark
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases0No Different than National Benchmark
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards)0.000No Different than National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit0.127No Different than National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit2.502No Different than National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Number of Urinary Catheter Days2580No Different than National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases2.641No Different than National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases2No Different than National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards)0.757No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Colon Surgery: Lower Confidence Limit0.012No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Colon Surgery: Upper Confidence Limit1.195No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Colon Surgery: Number of Procedures167No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Colon Surgery: Predicted Cases4.127No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Colon Surgery: Observed Cases1No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Colon Surgery0.242No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Lower Confidence LimitNot AvailableNot Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Upper Confidence LimitNot AvailableNot Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Number of Procedures83Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Predicted Cases0.671Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Observed Cases0Not Available
SSI - Abdominal HysterectomyNot AvailableNot Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Lower Confidence Limit0.030No Different than National Benchmark
MRSA Bacteremia: Upper Confidence Limit2.922No Different than National Benchmark
MRSA Bacteremia: Patient Days35703No Different than National Benchmark
MRSA Bacteremia: Predicted Cases1.688No Different than National Benchmark
MRSA Bacteremia: Observed Cases1No Different than National Benchmark
MRSA Bacteremia0.592No Different than National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Lower Confidence Limit0.064Better than the National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Upper Confidence Limit0.489Better than the National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Patient Days34273Better than the National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Predicted Cases19.743Better than the National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Observed Cases4Better than the National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff)0.203Better than the National Benchmark

How to read this: "Better than national" means the hospital's infection rate is statistically significantly lower than the national average — a sign of strong infection-control protocols (hand hygiene, sterilization, catheter management). "Worse than national" may warrant asking the hospital about their improvement initiatives.

Infection data reported to the CDC's National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN).

Complications & Deaths

CMS tracks post-surgical complications and mortality rates for common procedures and conditions (heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, hip/knee replacement, and more). These measures reflect how patients actually fare at this hospital compared to the national average.

MeasureScorePatientsvs. National
Rate of complications for hip/knee replacement patients2.8126No Different Than the National Rate
Hybrid Hospital-Wide All-Cause Risk Standardized Mortality Rate4.61,404No Different Than the National Rate
Death rate for heart attack patients12.6168No Different Than the National Rate
Death rate for CABG surgery patientsN/AN/ANot Available
Death rate for COPD patients9.391No Different Than the National Rate
Death rate for heart failure patients13.7294No Different Than the National Rate
Death rate for pneumonia patients16.8279No Different Than the National Rate
Death rate for stroke patients13.3143No Different Than the National Rate
Pressure ulcer rate0.223,781No Different Than the National Rate
Death rate among surgical inpatients with serious treatable complications145.4956No Different Than the National Rate
Iatrogenic pneumothorax rate0.274,870No Different Than the National Rate
In-hospital fall-associated fracture rate0.314,731No Different Than the National Rate
Postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma rate1.891,166No Different Than the National Rate
Postoperative acute kidney injury requiring dialysis rate1.62238No Different Than the National Rate
Postoperative respiratory failure rate8.95245No Different Than the National Rate
Perioperative pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis rate2.311,087No Different Than the National Rate
Postoperative sepsis rate5.61171No Different Than the National Rate
Postoperative wound dehiscence rate1.96329No Different Than the National Rate
Abdominopelvic accidental puncture or laceration rate0.86978No Different Than the National Rate
CMS Medicare PSI 90: Patient safety and adverse events composite0.83N/ANo Different Than the National Value

What to consider: A "worse than national" rating on mortality or complications is a serious signal — particularly for elective procedures where you have time to choose a facility. For emergency care, proximity and speed often outweigh these metrics. Ask the hospital about their outcomes for your specific procedure.

Readmissions & Unplanned Hospital Visits

A readmission means a patient returned to the hospital within 30 days of discharge. High readmission rates can signal gaps in discharge planning, patient education, or follow-up care coordination. CMS penalizes hospitals with excess readmissions through the HRRP.

MeasureScorePatientsvs. National
Hospital return days for heart attack patients-35.2162Fewer Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
Hospital return days for heart failure patients-11340Average Days per 100 Discharges
Hospital return days for pneumonia patients-11.9288Average Days per 100 Discharges
Hybrid Hospital-Wide All-Cause Readmission Measure (HWR)152,161No Different Than the National Rate
Rate of unplanned hospital visits after colonoscopy (per 1,000 colonoscopies)11.71,269No Different Than the National Rate
Rate of inpatient admissions for patients receiving outpatient chemotherapyN/A0Number of Cases Too Small
Rate of emergency department (ED) visits for patients receiving outpatient chemotherapyN/A0Number of Cases Too Small
Ratio of unplanned hospital visits after hospital outpatient surgery1364No Different than expected
Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) 30-Day Readmission Rate12.2162No Different Than the National Rate
Rate of readmission for CABGN/A0Not Available
Rate of readmission for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients17.9105No Different Than the National Rate
Heart failure (HF) 30-Day Readmission Rate19340No Different Than the National Rate
Rate of readmission after hip/knee replacement5.8116No Different Than the National Rate
Pneumonia (PN) 30-Day Readmission Rate15.3288No Different Than the National Rate

What to ask: If this hospital has higher-than-average readmission rates, ask about their discharge process — do they provide follow-up appointments, medication reconciliation, and clear care instructions before you leave?

Nearby Hospitals

If Lakewood Ranch Medical Center isn't in your Medicare plan's network — or you want to compare quality ratings before a procedure — these are the closest alternatives within 15 miles:

Manatee Memorial Hospital

0.8 miles
★★☆☆☆ 2/5
Bradenton, FL · 319 beds

Centerstone Of Florida

2.7 miles
Not Rated N/A
Bradenton, FL · 41 beds

Hca Florida Blake Hospital

3.1 miles
★★☆☆☆ 2/5
Bradenton, FL · 383 beds

Suncoast Behavioral Health Center

3.6 miles
Not Rated N/A
Bradenton, FL · 60 beds

Sarasota Memorial Hospital

12.7 miles
★★★★★ 5/5
Sarasota, FL · 897 beds

View all hospitals near 34205, FL →

Switching hospitals may mean switching plans. Check the Medicare enrollment timeline to make sure you don't miss your window, and use our enrollment checklist to stay organized.

Location & Directions

Address: 8330 Lakewood Ranch Blvd, Bradenton, FL 34202
Phone: (941) 782-2100

Get directions on Google Maps →

What to Do with This Information

Hospital quality data is most useful when paired with your specific situation. Here's how to act on it:

  • Check network status: Before choosing this hospital, verify it's in-network for your Medicare Advantage plan. Out-of-network care can cost significantly more.
  • Ask about specific outcomes: If you're considering an elective procedure, ask the hospital for their outcomes data on that specific surgery — not just overall ratings.
  • Compare nearby options: Use the nearby hospitals section above to compare quality scores across facilities in the area.
  • Review your Medicare plan: Your plan's network determines which hospitals you can access affordably. Use our enrollment checklist to stay organized if you're switching plans. Check enrollment deadlines →
  • Talk to your doctor: Ask your primary care physician which hospitals they're affiliated with and whether they're in-network for your plan. Print our doctor questions checklist →
View on Medicare.gov Compare Medicare Plans in 34205, FL →

Lakewood Ranch Medical Center: Common Questions

What does a 4-star rating mean for Lakewood Ranch Medical Center?

CMS rates hospitals on a 1-to-5 star scale based on quality measures across mortality, safety, readmission, patient experience, and timely care. A 4-star rating places this hospital above the national average. The rating is updated quarterly by CMS.

Does Lakewood Ranch Medical Center have an emergency room?

Yes, Lakewood Ranch Medical Center operates an emergency department.

How many doctors are affiliated with Lakewood Ranch Medical Center?

388 physicians are affiliated with this hospital according to CMS Physician Compare data. This includes 82 surgeons.

Does Lakewood Ranch Medical Center accept Medicare?

Yes. All hospitals listed on Medicare Hospital Compare are Medicare-certified facilities. However, whether this hospital is in-network for your specific Medicare Advantage plan depends on your plan's provider network. Check your plan documents or call your insurer to verify.

How many beds does Lakewood Ranch Medical Center have?

Lakewood Ranch Medical Center has 120 licensed beds. Bed count is an indicator of hospital capacity — larger hospitals often offer more specialized services.

Where does the data on this page come from?

All data is sourced from official CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) databases: Hospital Compare for quality measures and star ratings, Provider of Services for beds and services, and Physician Compare for doctor affiliations. Data is updated quarterly. Read our full methodology →

About the Reviewer

Wes Ward

Wes Ward

Founder & Data Lead

Wes Ward is the founder of InsuranceDataNow.org and reviews all hospital quality data and methodology for accuracy. Every hospital profile — including the CMS quality measures, infection rates, and doctor affiliations on this page — goes through his data-validation pipeline before publication.

With 25+ years in data analytics — including work with highly regulated genomic data at Ancestry.com — Wes brings enterprise-level rigor to healthcare transparency. He is also a co-founder of BestNeighborhood.org, CrimeGrade.org, and ISPReports.org.

View full profile →LinkedIn

Data sources: CMS Hospital Compare (February 2026), Provider of Services (Q4 2025), CMS Physician Compare, CDC NHSN. This page is for informational purposes only. Always verify information directly with the hospital. Read our full methodology →

Medicare Resources

Hospital quality data is just one piece of the Medicare puzzle. Explore our guides to make the best decisions for your coverage:

Does your Medicare plan cover Lakewood Ranch Medical Center?

Compare Plans in 34205, FL →