Hospital Profile

Gadsden Regional Medical Center

1007 Goodyear Avenue
Gadsden, AL 35903
★☆☆☆☆
1/5 CMS Overall Rating
346
Licensed Beds
Acute Care
Hospital Type
217
Affiliated Doctors
Moderate
Critical Care
0.9:1
Nurse-to-Bed Ratio
Data Source: Hospital data from CMS Hospital Compare (February 2026) and Provider of Services file (Q4 2025). Doctor affiliations from CMS Physician Compare. Quality measures are updated quarterly.
Reviewed by: Wes Ward, Founder & Data Lead • View our methodology

Hospital Details

Gadsden Regional Medical Center is a 1.00-star acute care hospital located in Gadsden, Alabama with 346 licensed beds. As a for-profit facility, it operates with a different financial structure than non-profit hospitals in the region.

A 1-star CMS rating indicates this hospital scores well below the national average. Consider reviewing individual quality domains below for more context. 217 physicians are affiliated with this facility, and it provides emergency services. Its critical care footprint covers 3 of 8 unit types (Moderate) with a 0.9:1 nurse-to-bed ratio.

Hospital Type Acute Care Hospitals
Ownership Proprietary
Teaching Status Non-Teaching Hospital

Quality Ratings & Measures

CMS evaluates hospitals across five quality domains. Here's how Gadsden Regional Medical Center compares:

1
Overall Rating
of 5 stars
💔
Worse than National
Mortality
0 of 7 better
🛡️
Same as National
Safety
1 of 7 better
🔄
Same as National
Readmission
0 of 9 better
😊
All 8 domains reported
Patient Experience
8 measures
💰
1.0700
Medicare Spending Index (MSPB)
Above National Avg (Higher Spending)

Quality data from CMS Hospital Compare. "Better than national" means statistically significantly better than the national average. Spending uses the CMS MSPB measure (Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary) index, where 1.000 is national average and values above/below 1.000 indicate higher/lower spending.

Patient Experience (HCAHPS Survey)

The HCAHPS survey is a standardized, national survey of hospital patients. It measures how patients perceive their care — including communication with doctors and nurses, responsiveness of staff, cleanliness, and discharge information. Higher percentages indicate better performance.

MeasureScoreStar Rating
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Always" clean63%N/A
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Sometimes" or "Never" clean14%N/A
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Usually" clean23%N/A
Cleanliness - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Cleanliness - star ratingNot Applicable%★★☆☆☆ (2)
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" communicated well76%N/A
Nurse communication - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well6%N/A
Nurse communication - star ratingNot Applicable%★★★☆☆ (3)
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" communicated well18%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" communicated well75%N/A
Doctor communication - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well6%N/A
Doctor communication - star ratingNot Applicable%★★☆☆☆ (2)
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" communicated well19%N/A
Patients who reported that staff "Always" explained about medicines before giving it to them57%N/A
Communication about medicines - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Patients who reported that staff "Sometimes" or "Never" explained about medicines before giving it to them27%N/A
Communication about medicines - star ratingNot Applicable%★★☆☆☆ (2)
Patients who reported that staff "Usually" explained about medicines before giving it to them16%N/A
Discharge information - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Patients who reported that NO, they were not given information about what to do during their recovery at home17%N/A
Discharge information - star ratingNot Applicable%★★☆☆☆ (2)
Patients who reported that YES, they were given information about what to do during their recovery at home83%N/A
Patients who reported that NO, they did not discuss whether they would need help after discharge19%N/A
Patients who reported that YES, they did discuss whether they would need help after discharge81%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" explained things in a way they could understand71%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand7%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand22%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" listened carefully to them73%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them7%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" listened carefully to them20%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect82%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect4%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect14%N/A
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 6 or lower on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)16%N/A
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 7 or 8 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)26%N/A
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 9 or 10 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)58%N/A
Overall hospital rating - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Overall hospital rating - star ratingNot Applicable%★★☆☆☆ (2)
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" communicated what the medication was for68%N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated what the medication was for15%N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" communicated what the medication was for.17%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" explained things in a way they could understand71%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand8%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand21%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" listened carefully to them74%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them6%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" listened carefully to them20%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect82%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect4%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect14%N/A
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Always" quiet at night61%N/A
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Sometimes" or "Never" quiet at night10%N/A
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Usually" quiet at night29%N/A
Quietness - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Quietness - star ratingNot Applicable%★★★☆☆ (3)
Patients who reported NO, they would probably not or definitely not recommend the hospital12%N/A
Patients who reported YES, they would definitely recommend the hospital58%N/A
Recommend hospital - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Patients who reported YES, they would probably recommend the hospital30%N/A
Recommend hospital - star ratingNot Applicable%★★☆☆☆ (2)
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" discussed possible side effects45%N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" discussed possible side effects39%N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" discussed possible side effects16%N/A
Summary star ratingNot Applicable%★★☆☆☆ (2)
Patients who reported that NO, they did not receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge16%N/A
Patients who reported that YES, they did receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge84%N/A

Survey response rate: 16% (491 surveys completed). Data from 04/01/2024 to 03/31/2025 .

Services & Specialties

Gadsden Regional Medical Center offers the following services based on CMS Provider of Services data:

Emergency & Critical Care

Gadsden Regional Medical Center offers 3 of 8 possible critical care capabilities, classified as Moderate. Moderate critical care (3–5 unit types) covers many common emergencies but may require transfers for specialized trauma, burns, or pediatric/neonatal intensive care. Consider whether your likely health needs are covered.

🚨 Emergency Department
🏥 Intensive Care Unit (ICU)
❤️ Coronary Care Unit (CCU)

Surgical Services

🏥 Inpatient Surgery
🏢 Outpatient Surgery
❤️ Open-Heart Surgery

Specialty Services

🤰 Obstetrics (OB)
🧒 Pediatric Services
🧠 Psychiatric Services
🌬️ Respiratory Care

Service availability is self-reported by the facility. Confirm specific services directly with the hospital. Use our printable question list to prepare for the conversation.

Bed Count, Capacity & Staffing

Gadsden Regional Medical Center has 346 licensed beds (346 Medicare-certified) with a nurse-to-bed ratio of 0.9:1. Higher ratios generally indicate more nursing staff per patient, which research links to better outcomes in medication errors, patient falls, and response times.

Bed Type Count
Total Licensed Beds346
CMS Certified Beds346
Psychiatric Unit Beds15
Staffing snapshot: 217 affiliated physicians • 298 registered nurses

Doctors Affiliated with Gadsden Regional Medical Center

217 physicians are affiliated with Gadsden Regional Medical Center, including 42 surgeons. Doctor affiliations are sourced from CMS Physician Compare data and indicate physicians who have a formal relationship with this hospital.

217
Total Doctors
47
Procedural Specialists
42
Surgeons

Featured Affiliated Physicians

Cesar T. Fernandez
Upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy for acid reflux
NPI: 1659363109
Vipul T. Amin
Upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy for acid reflux
NPI: 1720070659
Pankaj K. Kashyap
Upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy for acid reflux
NPI: 1609864248
Vijayaprasad Tummala
Upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy for acid reflux
NPI: 1104818616
Alan K. Willis
Varicose vein removal
NPI: 1225219256
Christopher G. Kelley
Upper limb (arm) arthroscopy (minimally invasive joint repair)
NPI: 1578589529

Showing 217 of 217 affiliated physicians. Doctor affiliations from CMS Physician Compare data.

Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAI)

Healthcare-associated infections are one of the most important safety metrics when evaluating a hospital. These infections are acquired during a hospital stay, not the reason for admission. CMS tracks rates for specific infection types and compares each hospital to the national benchmark.

Infection TypeScore (SIR)vs. National
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit0.014No Different than National Benchmark
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit1.429No Different than National Benchmark
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection: Number of Device Days4119No Different than National Benchmark
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases3.452No Different than National Benchmark
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases1No Different than National Benchmark
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards)0.290No Different than National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit0.055No Different than National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit1.082No Different than National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Number of Urinary Catheter Days6812No Different than National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases6.105No Different than National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases2No Different than National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards)0.328No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Colon Surgery: Lower Confidence LimitN/ABetter than the National Benchmark
SSI - Colon Surgery: Upper Confidence Limit0.937Better than the National Benchmark
SSI - Colon Surgery: Number of Procedures113Better than the National Benchmark
SSI - Colon Surgery: Predicted Cases3.196Better than the National Benchmark
SSI - Colon Surgery: Observed Cases0Better than the National Benchmark
SSI - Colon Surgery0.000Better than the National Benchmark
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Lower Confidence LimitN/ANo Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Upper Confidence Limit2.957No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Number of Procedures102No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Predicted Cases1.013No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Observed Cases0No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy0.000No Different than National Benchmark
MRSA Bacteremia: Lower Confidence Limit0.410No Different than National Benchmark
MRSA Bacteremia: Upper Confidence Limit3.110No Different than National Benchmark
MRSA Bacteremia: Patient Days46896No Different than National Benchmark
MRSA Bacteremia: Predicted Cases3.102No Different than National Benchmark
MRSA Bacteremia: Observed Cases4No Different than National Benchmark
MRSA Bacteremia1.289No Different than National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Lower Confidence LimitN/ABetter than the National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Upper Confidence Limit0.162Better than the National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Patient Days45659Better than the National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Predicted Cases18.544Better than the National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Observed Cases0Better than the National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff)0.000Better than the National Benchmark

How to read this: "Better than national" means the hospital's infection rate is statistically significantly lower than the national average — a sign of strong infection-control protocols (hand hygiene, sterilization, catheter management). "Worse than national" may warrant asking the hospital about their improvement initiatives.

Infection data reported to the CDC's National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN).

Complications & Deaths

CMS tracks post-surgical complications and mortality rates for common procedures and conditions (heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, hip/knee replacement, and more). These measures reflect how patients actually fare at this hospital compared to the national average.

MeasureScorePatientsvs. National
Rate of complications for hip/knee replacement patients4.250No Different Than the National Rate
Hybrid Hospital-Wide All-Cause Risk Standardized Mortality Rate4.9763No Different Than the National Rate
Death rate for heart attack patients11.188No Different Than the National Rate
Death rate for CABG surgery patients2.448No Different Than the National Rate
Death rate for COPD patients9.380No Different Than the National Rate
Death rate for heart failure patients10.8201No Different Than the National Rate
Death rate for pneumonia patients20.1233Worse Than the National Rate
Death rate for stroke patients12.9112No Different Than the National Rate
Pressure ulcer rate1.882,702Worse Than the National Rate
Death rate among surgical inpatients with serious treatable complications182.2744No Different Than the National Rate
Iatrogenic pneumothorax rate0.243,153No Different Than the National Rate
In-hospital fall-associated fracture rate0.283,346No Different Than the National Rate
Postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma rate1.97597No Different Than the National Rate
Postoperative acute kidney injury requiring dialysis rate1.57245No Different Than the National Rate
Postoperative respiratory failure rate15.12244No Different Than the National Rate
Perioperative pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis rate3.23633No Different Than the National Rate
Postoperative sepsis rate7.72219No Different Than the National Rate
Postoperative wound dehiscence rate1.70160No Different Than the National Rate
Abdominopelvic accidental puncture or laceration rate1.17555No Different Than the National Rate
CMS Medicare PSI 90: Patient safety and adverse events composite1.58N/AWorse Than the National Value

What to consider: A "worse than national" rating on mortality or complications is a serious signal — particularly for elective procedures where you have time to choose a facility. For emergency care, proximity and speed often outweigh these metrics. Ask the hospital about their outcomes for your specific procedure.

Readmissions & Unplanned Hospital Visits

A readmission means a patient returned to the hospital within 30 days of discharge. High readmission rates can signal gaps in discharge planning, patient education, or follow-up care coordination. CMS penalizes hospitals with excess readmissions through the HRRP.

MeasureScorePatientsvs. National
Hospital return days for heart attack patients-12.389Average Days per 100 Discharges
Hospital return days for heart failure patients20229More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
Hospital return days for pneumonia patients8248Average Days per 100 Discharges
Hybrid Hospital-Wide All-Cause Readmission Measure (HWR)15.91,227No Different Than the National Rate
Rate of unplanned hospital visits after colonoscopy (per 1,000 colonoscopies)13.1359No Different Than the National Rate
Rate of inpatient admissions for patients receiving outpatient chemotherapyN/A0Number of Cases Too Small
Rate of emergency department (ED) visits for patients receiving outpatient chemotherapyN/A0Number of Cases Too Small
Ratio of unplanned hospital visits after hospital outpatient surgery1361No Different than expected
Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) 30-Day Readmission Rate13.389No Different Than the National Rate
Rate of readmission for CABG12.447No Different Than the National Rate
Rate of readmission for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients18.189No Different Than the National Rate
Heart failure (HF) 30-Day Readmission Rate19.1229No Different Than the National Rate
Rate of readmission after hip/knee replacement5.446No Different Than the National Rate
Pneumonia (PN) 30-Day Readmission Rate16.2248No Different Than the National Rate

What to ask: If this hospital has higher-than-average readmission rates, ask about their discharge process — do they provide follow-up appointments, medication reconciliation, and clear care instructions before you leave?

Nearby Hospitals

If Gadsden Regional Medical Center isn't in your Medicare plan's network — or you want to compare quality ratings before a procedure — these are the closest alternatives within 15 miles:

Riverview Regional Medical Center

2.1 miles
★★☆☆☆ 2/5
Gadsden, AL · 281 beds

Mountain View Hospital

5.2 miles
Not Rated N/A
Gadsden, AL · 68 beds

View all hospitals near 35903, AL →

Switching hospitals may mean switching plans. Check the Medicare enrollment timeline to make sure you don't miss your window, and use our enrollment checklist to stay organized.

Location & Directions

Address: 1007 Goodyear Avenue, Gadsden, AL 35903
Phone: (256) 494-4000

Get directions on Google Maps →

What to Do with This Information

Hospital quality data is most useful when paired with your specific situation. Here's how to act on it:

  • Check network status: Before choosing this hospital, verify it's in-network for your Medicare Advantage plan. Out-of-network care can cost significantly more.
  • Ask about specific outcomes: If you're considering an elective procedure, ask the hospital for their outcomes data on that specific surgery — not just overall ratings.
  • Compare nearby options: Use the nearby hospitals section above to compare quality scores across facilities in the area.
  • Review your Medicare plan: Your plan's network determines which hospitals you can access affordably. Use our enrollment checklist to stay organized if you're switching plans. Check enrollment deadlines →
  • Talk to your doctor: Ask your primary care physician which hospitals they're affiliated with and whether they're in-network for your plan. Print our doctor questions checklist →
View on Medicare.gov Compare Medicare Plans in 35903, AL →

Gadsden Regional Medical Center: Common Questions

What does a 1-star rating mean for Gadsden Regional Medical Center?

CMS rates hospitals on a 1-to-5 star scale based on quality measures across mortality, safety, readmission, patient experience, and timely care. A 1-star rating indicates this hospital is below the national average on some measures. The rating is updated quarterly by CMS.

Does Gadsden Regional Medical Center have an emergency room?

Yes, Gadsden Regional Medical Center operates an emergency department.

How many doctors are affiliated with Gadsden Regional Medical Center?

217 physicians are affiliated with this hospital according to CMS Physician Compare data. This includes 42 surgeons.

Does Gadsden Regional Medical Center accept Medicare?

Yes. All hospitals listed on Medicare Hospital Compare are Medicare-certified facilities. However, whether this hospital is in-network for your specific Medicare Advantage plan depends on your plan's provider network. Check your plan documents or call your insurer to verify.

How many beds does Gadsden Regional Medical Center have?

Gadsden Regional Medical Center has 346 licensed beds. Bed count is an indicator of hospital capacity — larger hospitals often offer more specialized services.

Where does the data on this page come from?

All data is sourced from official CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) databases: Hospital Compare for quality measures and star ratings, Provider of Services for beds and services, and Physician Compare for doctor affiliations. Data is updated quarterly. Read our full methodology →

About the Reviewer

Wes Ward

Wes Ward

Founder & Data Lead

Wes Ward is the founder of InsuranceDataNow.org and reviews all hospital quality data and methodology for accuracy. Every hospital profile — including the CMS quality measures, infection rates, and doctor affiliations on this page — goes through his data-validation pipeline before publication.

With 25+ years in data analytics — including work with highly regulated genomic data at Ancestry.com — Wes brings enterprise-level rigor to healthcare transparency. He is also a co-founder of BestNeighborhood.org, CrimeGrade.org, and ISPReports.org.

View full profile →LinkedIn

Data sources: CMS Hospital Compare (February 2026), Provider of Services (Q4 2025), CMS Physician Compare, CDC NHSN. This page is for informational purposes only. Always verify information directly with the hospital. Read our full methodology →

Medicare Resources

Hospital quality data is just one piece of the Medicare puzzle. Explore our guides to make the best decisions for your coverage:

Does your Medicare plan cover Gadsden Regional Medical Center?

Compare Plans in 35903, AL →