Hospital Profile

Jackson Hospital & Clinic Inc

1725 Pine Street
Montgomery, AL 36106
★★☆☆☆
2/5 CMS Overall Rating
344
Licensed Beds
Acute Care
Hospital Type
241
Affiliated Doctors
Moderate
Critical Care
1.2:1
Nurse-to-Bed Ratio
Data Source: Hospital data from CMS Hospital Compare (February 2026) and Provider of Services file (Q4 2025). Doctor affiliations from CMS Physician Compare. Quality measures are updated quarterly.
Reviewed by: Wes Ward, Founder & Data Lead • View our methodology

Hospital Details

Jackson Hospital & Clinic Inc is a 2.00-star acute care hospital located in Montgomery, Alabama with 344 licensed beds. As a private non-profit, its revenue is reinvested into patient care and community programs.

Its 2-star CMS rating is below the national average, which may indicate opportunities for improvement across quality domains. 241 physicians are affiliated with this facility, and it provides emergency services. Its critical care footprint covers 3 of 8 unit types (Moderate) with a 1.2:1 nurse-to-bed ratio.

Hospital Type Acute Care Hospitals
Ownership Voluntary non-profit - Private
Teaching Status Non-Teaching Hospital

Quality Ratings & Measures

CMS evaluates hospitals across five quality domains. Here's how Jackson Hospital & Clinic Inc compares:

2
Overall Rating
of 5 stars
💔
Same as National
Mortality
0 of 7 better
🛡️
Same as National
Safety
1 of 6 better
🔄
Worse than National
Readmission
1 of 10 better
😊
All 8 domains reported
Patient Experience
8 measures
💰
1.0200
Medicare Spending Index (MSPB)
Near National Avg

Quality data from CMS Hospital Compare. "Better than national" means statistically significantly better than the national average. Spending uses the CMS MSPB measure (Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary) index, where 1.000 is national average and values above/below 1.000 indicate higher/lower spending.

Patient Experience (HCAHPS Survey)

The HCAHPS survey is a standardized, national survey of hospital patients. It measures how patients perceive their care — including communication with doctors and nurses, responsiveness of staff, cleanliness, and discharge information. Higher percentages indicate better performance.

MeasureScoreStar Rating
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Always" clean60%N/A
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Sometimes" or "Never" clean18%N/A
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Usually" clean22%N/A
Cleanliness - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Cleanliness - star ratingNot Applicable%★★☆☆☆ (2)
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" communicated well78%N/A
Nurse communication - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well6%N/A
Nurse communication - star ratingNot Applicable%★★★☆☆ (3)
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" communicated well16%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" communicated well79%N/A
Doctor communication - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well6%N/A
Doctor communication - star ratingNot Applicable%★★★☆☆ (3)
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" communicated well15%N/A
Patients who reported that staff "Always" explained about medicines before giving it to them59%N/A
Communication about medicines - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Patients who reported that staff "Sometimes" or "Never" explained about medicines before giving it to them24%N/A
Communication about medicines - star ratingNot Applicable%★★☆☆☆ (2)
Patients who reported that staff "Usually" explained about medicines before giving it to them17%N/A
Discharge information - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Patients who reported that NO, they were not given information about what to do during their recovery at home16%N/A
Discharge information - star ratingNot Applicable%★★★☆☆ (3)
Patients who reported that YES, they were given information about what to do during their recovery at home84%N/A
Patients who reported that NO, they did not discuss whether they would need help after discharge20%N/A
Patients who reported that YES, they did discuss whether they would need help after discharge80%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" explained things in a way they could understand76%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand7%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand17%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" listened carefully to them76%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them6%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" listened carefully to them18%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect86%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect4%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect10%N/A
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 6 or lower on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)10%N/A
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 7 or 8 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)22%N/A
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 9 or 10 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)68%N/A
Overall hospital rating - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Overall hospital rating - star ratingNot Applicable%★★★☆☆ (3)
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" communicated what the medication was for76%N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated what the medication was for12%N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" communicated what the medication was for.12%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" explained things in a way they could understand73%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand7%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand20%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" listened carefully to them76%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them6%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" listened carefully to them18%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect84%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect4%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect12%N/A
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Always" quiet at night69%N/A
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Sometimes" or "Never" quiet at night10%N/A
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Usually" quiet at night21%N/A
Quietness - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Quietness - star ratingNot Applicable%★★★★☆ (4)
Patients who reported NO, they would probably not or definitely not recommend the hospital7%N/A
Patients who reported YES, they would definitely recommend the hospital68%N/A
Recommend hospital - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Patients who reported YES, they would probably recommend the hospital25%N/A
Recommend hospital - star ratingNot Applicable%★★★☆☆ (3)
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" discussed possible side effects43%N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" discussed possible side effects36%N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" discussed possible side effects21%N/A
Summary star ratingNot Applicable%★★★☆☆ (3)
Patients who reported that NO, they did not receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge11%N/A
Patients who reported that YES, they did receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge89%N/A

Survey response rate: 16% (688 surveys completed). Data from 04/01/2024 to 03/31/2025 .

Services & Specialties

Jackson Hospital & Clinic Inc offers the following services based on CMS Provider of Services data:

Emergency & Critical Care

Jackson Hospital & Clinic Inc offers 3 of 8 possible critical care capabilities, classified as Moderate. Moderate critical care (3–5 unit types) covers many common emergencies but may require transfers for specialized trauma, burns, or pediatric/neonatal intensive care. Consider whether your likely health needs are covered.

🚨 Emergency Department
🏥 Intensive Care Unit (ICU)
❤️ Coronary Care Unit (CCU)

Surgical Services

🏥 Inpatient Surgery
🏢 Outpatient Surgery
❤️ Open-Heart Surgery

Specialty Services

🤰 Obstetrics (OB)
🧒 Pediatric Services
🌬️ Respiratory Care

Service availability is self-reported by the facility. Confirm specific services directly with the hospital. Use our printable question list to prepare for the conversation.

Bed Count, Capacity & Staffing

Jackson Hospital & Clinic Inc has 344 licensed beds (344 Medicare-certified) with a nurse-to-bed ratio of 1.2:1. Higher ratios generally indicate more nursing staff per patient, which research links to better outcomes in medication errors, patient falls, and response times.

Bed Type Count
Total Licensed Beds344
CMS Certified Beds344
Psychiatric Unit Beds22
Staffing snapshot: 241 affiliated physicians • 418 registered nurses

Doctors Affiliated with Jackson Hospital & Clinic Inc

241 physicians are affiliated with Jackson Hospital & Clinic Inc, including 27 surgeons. Doctor affiliations are sourced from CMS Physician Compare data and indicate physicians who have a formal relationship with this hospital.

241
Total Doctors
34
Procedural Specialists
27
Surgeons

Featured Affiliated Physicians

In C. Shin
Cataract surgery
NPI: 1245215656
Hiren G. Patel
Upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy for acid reflux
NPI: 1316202823
Paul Vincent Co
Upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy for acid reflux
NPI: 1992069348
Thomas D. Bianchi
Upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy for acid reflux
NPI: 1306818232
Ralph B. Redd
Leg revascularization (restoring blood flow)
NPI: 1487676045
Muhammad Haris
Upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy for acid reflux
NPI: 1073043279

Showing 241 of 241 affiliated physicians. Doctor affiliations from CMS Physician Compare data.

Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAI)

Healthcare-associated infections are one of the most important safety metrics when evaluating a hospital. These infections are acquired during a hospital stay, not the reason for admission. CMS tracks rates for specific infection types and compares each hospital to the national benchmark.

Infection TypeScore (SIR)vs. National
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit0.986No Different than National Benchmark
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit3.459No Different than National Benchmark
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection: Number of Device Days4852No Different than National Benchmark
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases5.153No Different than National Benchmark
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases10No Different than National Benchmark
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards)1.941No Different than National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit0.618No Different than National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit1.778No Different than National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Number of Urinary Catheter Days10401No Different than National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases12.898No Different than National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases14No Different than National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards)1.085No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Colon Surgery: Lower Confidence Limit0.096No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Colon Surgery: Upper Confidence Limit1.896No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Colon Surgery: Number of Procedures124No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Colon Surgery: Predicted Cases3.486No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Colon Surgery: Observed Cases2No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Colon Surgery0.574No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Lower Confidence LimitNot AvailableNot Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Upper Confidence LimitNot AvailableNot Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Number of Procedures45Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Predicted Cases0.421Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Observed Cases0Not Available
SSI - Abdominal HysterectomyNot AvailableNot Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Lower Confidence Limit1.549Worse than the National Benchmark
MRSA Bacteremia: Upper Confidence Limit5.436Worse than the National Benchmark
MRSA Bacteremia: Patient Days58750Worse than the National Benchmark
MRSA Bacteremia: Predicted Cases3.279Worse than the National Benchmark
MRSA Bacteremia: Observed Cases10Worse than the National Benchmark
MRSA Bacteremia3.050Worse than the National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Lower Confidence Limit0.789No Different than National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Upper Confidence Limit1.448No Different than National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Patient Days56682No Different than National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Predicted Cases38.840No Different than National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Observed Cases42No Different than National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff)1.081No Different than National Benchmark

How to read this: "Better than national" means the hospital's infection rate is statistically significantly lower than the national average — a sign of strong infection-control protocols (hand hygiene, sterilization, catheter management). "Worse than national" may warrant asking the hospital about their improvement initiatives.

Infection data reported to the CDC's National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN).

Complications & Deaths

CMS tracks post-surgical complications and mortality rates for common procedures and conditions (heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, hip/knee replacement, and more). These measures reflect how patients actually fare at this hospital compared to the national average.

MeasureScorePatientsvs. National
Rate of complications for hip/knee replacement patientsN/AN/ANumber of Cases Too Small
Hybrid Hospital-Wide All-Cause Risk Standardized Mortality Rate5.11,020No Different Than the National Rate
Death rate for heart attack patients11.7142No Different Than the National Rate
Death rate for CABG surgery patients376No Different Than the National Rate
Death rate for COPD patients7.879No Different Than the National Rate
Death rate for heart failure patients13273No Different Than the National Rate
Death rate for pneumonia patients20.8261Worse Than the National Rate
Death rate for stroke patients14.3124No Different Than the National Rate
Pressure ulcer rate0.833,692No Different Than the National Rate
Death rate among surgical inpatients with serious treatable complications176.1143No Different Than the National Rate
Iatrogenic pneumothorax rate0.174,424No Different Than the National Rate
In-hospital fall-associated fracture rate0.314,478No Different Than the National Rate
Postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma rate1.751,058No Different Than the National Rate
Postoperative acute kidney injury requiring dialysis rate1.46293No Different Than the National Rate
Postoperative respiratory failure rate6.49327No Different Than the National Rate
Perioperative pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis rate3.081,025No Different Than the National Rate
Postoperative sepsis rate5.62299No Different Than the National Rate
Postoperative wound dehiscence rate1.64266No Different Than the National Rate
Abdominopelvic accidental puncture or laceration rate0.88875No Different Than the National Rate
CMS Medicare PSI 90: Patient safety and adverse events composite0.95N/ANo Different Than the National Value

What to consider: A "worse than national" rating on mortality or complications is a serious signal — particularly for elective procedures where you have time to choose a facility. For emergency care, proximity and speed often outweigh these metrics. Ask the hospital about their outcomes for your specific procedure.

Readmissions & Unplanned Hospital Visits

A readmission means a patient returned to the hospital within 30 days of discharge. High readmission rates can signal gaps in discharge planning, patient education, or follow-up care coordination. CMS penalizes hospitals with excess readmissions through the HRRP.

MeasureScorePatientsvs. National
Hospital return days for heart attack patients0.6141Average Days per 100 Discharges
Hospital return days for heart failure patients0.2321Average Days per 100 Discharges
Hospital return days for pneumonia patients10.2260Average Days per 100 Discharges
Hybrid Hospital-Wide All-Cause Readmission Measure (HWR)15.81,592No Different Than the National Rate
Rate of unplanned hospital visits after colonoscopy (per 1,000 colonoscopies)12.1401No Different Than the National Rate
Rate of inpatient admissions for patients receiving outpatient chemotherapy10.294No Different Than the National Rate
Rate of emergency department (ED) visits for patients receiving outpatient chemotherapy5.994No Different Than the National Rate
Ratio of unplanned hospital visits after hospital outpatient surgery0.9352No Different than expected
Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) 30-Day Readmission Rate13.8141No Different Than the National Rate
Rate of readmission for CABG9.971No Different Than the National Rate
Rate of readmission for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients17.487No Different Than the National Rate
Heart failure (HF) 30-Day Readmission Rate20321No Different Than the National Rate
Rate of readmission after hip/knee replacementN/A0Number of Cases Too Small
Pneumonia (PN) 30-Day Readmission Rate16260No Different Than the National Rate

What to ask: If this hospital has higher-than-average readmission rates, ask about their discharge process — do they provide follow-up appointments, medication reconciliation, and clear care instructions before you leave?

Nearby Hospitals

If Jackson Hospital & Clinic Inc isn't in your Medicare plan's network — or you want to compare quality ratings before a procedure — these are the closest alternatives within 15 miles:

Va Central Alabama Healthcare System - Montgomery

2.5 miles
★★★★★ 5/5
Montgomery, AL · 285 beds

Baptist Medical Center South

2.7 miles
★☆☆☆☆ 1/5
Montgomery, AL · 432 beds

Baptist Medical Center East

6.4 miles
★★★★☆ 4/5
Montgomery, AL · 150 beds

Prattville Baptist Hospital

11.8 miles
★★★☆☆ 3/5
Prattville, AL · 85 beds

Elmore Community Hospital

14.1 miles
Not Rated N/A
Wetumpka, AL · 38 beds

View all hospitals near 36106, AL →

Switching hospitals may mean switching plans. Check the Medicare enrollment timeline to make sure you don't miss your window, and use our enrollment checklist to stay organized.

Location & Directions

Address: 1725 Pine Street, Montgomery, AL 36106
Phone: (334) 293-8000

Get directions on Google Maps →

What to Do with This Information

Hospital quality data is most useful when paired with your specific situation. Here's how to act on it:

  • Check network status: Before choosing this hospital, verify it's in-network for your Medicare Advantage plan. Out-of-network care can cost significantly more.
  • Ask about specific outcomes: If you're considering an elective procedure, ask the hospital for their outcomes data on that specific surgery — not just overall ratings.
  • Compare nearby options: Use the nearby hospitals section above to compare quality scores across facilities in the area.
  • Review your Medicare plan: Your plan's network determines which hospitals you can access affordably. Use our enrollment checklist to stay organized if you're switching plans. Check enrollment deadlines →
  • Talk to your doctor: Ask your primary care physician which hospitals they're affiliated with and whether they're in-network for your plan. Print our doctor questions checklist →
View on Medicare.gov Compare Medicare Plans in 36106, AL →

Jackson Hospital & Clinic Inc: Common Questions

What does a 2-star rating mean for Jackson Hospital & Clinic Inc?

CMS rates hospitals on a 1-to-5 star scale based on quality measures across mortality, safety, readmission, patient experience, and timely care. A 2-star rating indicates this hospital is below the national average on some measures. The rating is updated quarterly by CMS.

Does Jackson Hospital & Clinic Inc have an emergency room?

Yes, Jackson Hospital & Clinic Inc operates an emergency department.

How many doctors are affiliated with Jackson Hospital & Clinic Inc?

241 physicians are affiliated with this hospital according to CMS Physician Compare data. This includes 27 surgeons.

Does Jackson Hospital & Clinic Inc accept Medicare?

Yes. All hospitals listed on Medicare Hospital Compare are Medicare-certified facilities. However, whether this hospital is in-network for your specific Medicare Advantage plan depends on your plan's provider network. Check your plan documents or call your insurer to verify.

How many beds does Jackson Hospital & Clinic Inc have?

Jackson Hospital & Clinic Inc has 344 licensed beds. Bed count is an indicator of hospital capacity — larger hospitals often offer more specialized services.

Where does the data on this page come from?

All data is sourced from official CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) databases: Hospital Compare for quality measures and star ratings, Provider of Services for beds and services, and Physician Compare for doctor affiliations. Data is updated quarterly. Read our full methodology →

About the Reviewer

Wes Ward

Wes Ward

Founder & Data Lead

Wes Ward is the founder of InsuranceDataNow.org and reviews all hospital quality data and methodology for accuracy. Every hospital profile — including the CMS quality measures, infection rates, and doctor affiliations on this page — goes through his data-validation pipeline before publication.

With 25+ years in data analytics — including work with highly regulated genomic data at Ancestry.com — Wes brings enterprise-level rigor to healthcare transparency. He is also a co-founder of BestNeighborhood.org, CrimeGrade.org, and ISPReports.org.

View full profile →LinkedIn

Data sources: CMS Hospital Compare (February 2026), Provider of Services (Q4 2025), CMS Physician Compare, CDC NHSN. This page is for informational purposes only. Always verify information directly with the hospital. Read our full methodology →

Medicare Resources

Hospital quality data is just one piece of the Medicare puzzle. Explore our guides to make the best decisions for your coverage:

Does your Medicare plan cover Jackson Hospital & Clinic Inc?

Compare Plans in 36106, AL →