Hospital Profile

Forrest General Hospital

6051 Us Highway 49
Hattiesburg, MS 39401
★★☆☆☆
2/5 CMS Overall Rating
537
Licensed Beds
Acute Care
Hospital Type
478
Affiliated Doctors
Comprehensive
Critical Care
1.6:1
Nurse-to-Bed Ratio
Data Source: Hospital data from CMS Hospital Compare (February 2026) and Provider of Services file (Q4 2025). Doctor affiliations from CMS Physician Compare. Quality measures are updated quarterly.
Reviewed by: Wes Ward, Founder & Data Lead • View our methodology

Hospital Details

Forrest General Hospital is a 2.00-star acute care hospital located in Hattiesburg, Mississippi with 537 licensed beds. As a locally-operated public hospital, it often serves as the community's primary healthcare safety net.

Its 2-star CMS rating is below the national average, which may indicate opportunities for improvement across quality domains. 478 physicians are affiliated with this facility, and it provides emergency services. Its critical care footprint covers 6 of 8 unit types (Comprehensive) with a 1.6:1 nurse-to-bed ratio.

Hospital Type Acute Care Hospitals
Ownership Government - Local
Teaching Status Non-Teaching Hospital

Quality Ratings & Measures

CMS evaluates hospitals across five quality domains. Here's how Forrest General Hospital compares:

2
Overall Rating
of 5 stars
💔
Worse than National
Mortality
0 of 7 better
🛡️
Better than National
Safety
3 of 8 better
🔄
Worse than National
Readmission
0 of 11 better
😊
All 8 domains reported
Patient Experience
8 measures
💰
1.0000
Medicare Spending Index (MSPB)
Near National Avg

Quality data from CMS Hospital Compare. "Better than national" means statistically significantly better than the national average. Spending uses the CMS MSPB measure (Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary) index, where 1.000 is national average and values above/below 1.000 indicate higher/lower spending.

Patient Experience (HCAHPS Survey)

The HCAHPS survey is a standardized, national survey of hospital patients. It measures how patients perceive their care — including communication with doctors and nurses, responsiveness of staff, cleanliness, and discharge information. Higher percentages indicate better performance.

MeasureScoreStar Rating
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Always" clean61%N/A
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Sometimes" or "Never" clean17%N/A
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Usually" clean22%N/A
Cleanliness - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Cleanliness - star ratingNot Applicable%★★☆☆☆ (2)
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" communicated well82%N/A
Nurse communication - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well3%N/A
Nurse communication - star ratingNot Applicable%★★★★☆ (4)
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" communicated well15%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" communicated well83%N/A
Doctor communication - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well4%N/A
Doctor communication - star ratingNot Applicable%★★★★☆ (4)
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" communicated well13%N/A
Patients who reported that staff "Always" explained about medicines before giving it to them63%N/A
Communication about medicines - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Patients who reported that staff "Sometimes" or "Never" explained about medicines before giving it to them20%N/A
Communication about medicines - star ratingNot Applicable%★★★☆☆ (3)
Patients who reported that staff "Usually" explained about medicines before giving it to them17%N/A
Discharge information - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Patients who reported that NO, they were not given information about what to do during their recovery at home15%N/A
Discharge information - star ratingNot Applicable%★★★☆☆ (3)
Patients who reported that YES, they were given information about what to do during their recovery at home85%N/A
Patients who reported that NO, they did not discuss whether they would need help after discharge15%N/A
Patients who reported that YES, they did discuss whether they would need help after discharge85%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" explained things in a way they could understand79%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand5%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand16%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" listened carefully to them81%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them4%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" listened carefully to them15%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect88%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect3%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect9%N/A
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 6 or lower on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)7%N/A
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 7 or 8 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)19%N/A
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 9 or 10 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)74%N/A
Overall hospital rating - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Overall hospital rating - star ratingNot Applicable%★★★★☆ (4)
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" communicated what the medication was for77%N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated what the medication was for9%N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" communicated what the medication was for.14%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" explained things in a way they could understand79%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand4%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand17%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" listened carefully to them79%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them4%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" listened carefully to them17%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect88%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect2%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect10%N/A
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Always" quiet at night66%N/A
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Sometimes" or "Never" quiet at night6%N/A
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Usually" quiet at night28%N/A
Quietness - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Quietness - star ratingNot Applicable%★★★★☆ (4)
Patients who reported NO, they would probably not or definitely not recommend the hospital3%N/A
Patients who reported YES, they would definitely recommend the hospital76%N/A
Recommend hospital - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Patients who reported YES, they would probably recommend the hospital21%N/A
Recommend hospital - star ratingNot Applicable%★★★★★ (5)
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" discussed possible side effects49%N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" discussed possible side effects30%N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" discussed possible side effects21%N/A
Summary star ratingNot Applicable%★★★★☆ (4)
Patients who reported that NO, they did not receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge15%N/A
Patients who reported that YES, they did receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge85%N/A

Survey response rate: 16% (1872 surveys completed). Data from 04/01/2024 to 03/31/2025 .

Services & Specialties

Forrest General Hospital offers the following services based on CMS Provider of Services data:

Emergency & Critical Care

Forrest General Hospital offers 6 of 8 possible critical care capabilities, classified as Comprehensive. Comprehensive critical care hospitals (6+ unit types) are typically equipped to handle the widest range of emergencies, from cardiac events and severe burns to pediatric and neonatal crises — a key factor in plan selection for families or those with complex health needs.

🚨 Emergency Department
🔬 Surgical ICU
❤️ Coronary Care Unit (CCU)
🆘 Shock-Trauma
👶 Pediatric ICU
🍼 Neonatal ICU (NICU)

Surgical Services

🏥 Inpatient Surgery
🏢 Outpatient Surgery
❤️ Open-Heart Surgery
🧠 Neurosurgery
💓 Cardiac Catheterization Lab
Reconstructive Surgery

Specialty Services

🤰 Obstetrics (OB)
👶 Neonatal Nursery
🧒 Pediatric Services
🧠 Psychiatric Services
🩺 Substance Abuse Treatment
💉 Chemotherapy
🌬️ Respiratory Care

Service availability is self-reported by the facility. Confirm specific services directly with the hospital. Use our printable question list to prepare for the conversation.

Bed Count, Capacity & Staffing

Forrest General Hospital has 537 licensed beds (537 Medicare-certified) with a nurse-to-bed ratio of 1.6:1. Higher ratios generally indicate more nursing staff per patient, which research links to better outcomes in medication errors, patient falls, and response times.

Bed Type Count
Total Licensed Beds537
CMS Certified Beds537
Psychiatric Unit Beds46
Staffing snapshot: 478 affiliated physicians • 848 registered nurses • 25 operating rooms

Doctors Affiliated with Forrest General Hospital

478 physicians are affiliated with Forrest General Hospital, including 95 surgeons. Doctor affiliations are sourced from CMS Physician Compare data and indicate physicians who have a formal relationship with this hospital.

478
Total Doctors
115
Procedural Specialists
95
Surgeons

Featured Affiliated Physicians

Charles E. Johnson
Upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy for acid reflux
NPI: 1285675835
Ricardo Romero
Upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy for acid reflux
NPI: 1366539991
Telciane S. Vesa
Upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy for acid reflux
NPI: 1295932168
John M. Runnels
Upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy for acid reflux
NPI: 1215149711
Michael Goebel
Upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy for acid reflux
NPI: 1366607749
Joseph P. Phillips
Colonoscopy
NPI: 1366550758

Showing 478 of 478 affiliated physicians. Doctor affiliations from CMS Physician Compare data.

Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAI)

Healthcare-associated infections are one of the most important safety metrics when evaluating a hospital. These infections are acquired during a hospital stay, not the reason for admission. CMS tracks rates for specific infection types and compares each hospital to the national benchmark.

Infection TypeScore (SIR)vs. National
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit0.456No Different than National Benchmark
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit1.430No Different than National Benchmark
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection: Number of Device Days13734No Different than National Benchmark
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases14.263No Different than National Benchmark
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases12No Different than National Benchmark
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards)0.841No Different than National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit0.089Better than the National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit0.679Better than the National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Number of Urinary Catheter Days11292Better than the National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases14.211Better than the National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases4Better than the National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards)0.281Better than the National Benchmark
SSI - Colon Surgery: Lower Confidence Limit0.313No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Colon Surgery: Upper Confidence Limit1.607No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Colon Surgery: Number of Procedures277No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Colon Surgery: Predicted Cases7.768No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Colon Surgery: Observed Cases6No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Colon Surgery0.772No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Lower Confidence Limit0.441No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Upper Confidence Limit2.668No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Number of Procedures420No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Predicted Cases4.154No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Observed Cases5No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy1.204No Different than National Benchmark
MRSA Bacteremia: Lower Confidence Limit0.789No Different than National Benchmark
MRSA Bacteremia: Upper Confidence Limit2.366No Different than National Benchmark
MRSA Bacteremia: Patient Days144488No Different than National Benchmark
MRSA Bacteremia: Predicted Cases9.161No Different than National Benchmark
MRSA Bacteremia: Observed Cases13No Different than National Benchmark
MRSA Bacteremia1.419No Different than National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Lower Confidence Limit0.489Better than the National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Upper Confidence Limit0.790Better than the National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Patient Days138688Better than the National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Predicted Cases107.050Better than the National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Observed Cases67Better than the National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff)0.626Better than the National Benchmark

How to read this: "Better than national" means the hospital's infection rate is statistically significantly lower than the national average — a sign of strong infection-control protocols (hand hygiene, sterilization, catheter management). "Worse than national" may warrant asking the hospital about their improvement initiatives.

Infection data reported to the CDC's National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN).

Complications & Deaths

CMS tracks post-surgical complications and mortality rates for common procedures and conditions (heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, hip/knee replacement, and more). These measures reflect how patients actually fare at this hospital compared to the national average.

MeasureScorePatientsvs. National
Rate of complications for hip/knee replacement patients3.4362No Different Than the National Rate
Hybrid Hospital-Wide All-Cause Risk Standardized Mortality Rate4.22,949No Different Than the National Rate
Death rate for heart attack patients12.4278No Different Than the National Rate
Death rate for CABG surgery patients3.7240No Different Than the National Rate
Death rate for COPD patients9.1215No Different Than the National Rate
Death rate for heart failure patients15580Worse Than the National Rate
Death rate for pneumonia patients19.4690Worse Than the National Rate
Death rate for stroke patients13.2350No Different Than the National Rate
Pressure ulcer rate0.618,410No Different Than the National Rate
Death rate among surgical inpatients with serious treatable complications195.13142No Different Than the National Rate
Iatrogenic pneumothorax rate0.2911,164No Different Than the National Rate
In-hospital fall-associated fracture rate0.2211,576No Different Than the National Rate
Postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma rate3.043,079No Different Than the National Rate
Postoperative acute kidney injury requiring dialysis rate1.061,325No Different Than the National Rate
Postoperative respiratory failure rate12.751,318No Different Than the National Rate
Perioperative pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis rate3.443,212No Different Than the National Rate
Postoperative sepsis rate5.311,247No Different Than the National Rate
Postoperative wound dehiscence rate2.06460No Different Than the National Rate
Abdominopelvic accidental puncture or laceration rate1.271,799No Different Than the National Rate
CMS Medicare PSI 90: Patient safety and adverse events composite1.08N/ANo Different Than the National Value

What to consider: A "worse than national" rating on mortality or complications is a serious signal — particularly for elective procedures where you have time to choose a facility. For emergency care, proximity and speed often outweigh these metrics. Ask the hospital about their outcomes for your specific procedure.

Readmissions & Unplanned Hospital Visits

A readmission means a patient returned to the hospital within 30 days of discharge. High readmission rates can signal gaps in discharge planning, patient education, or follow-up care coordination. CMS penalizes hospitals with excess readmissions through the HRRP.

MeasureScorePatientsvs. National
Hospital return days for heart attack patients20312More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
Hospital return days for heart failure patients9.5697More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
Hospital return days for pneumonia patients29.7742More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
Hybrid Hospital-Wide All-Cause Readmission Measure (HWR)154,656No Different Than the National Rate
Rate of unplanned hospital visits after colonoscopy (per 1,000 colonoscopies)13.251No Different Than the National Rate
Rate of inpatient admissions for patients receiving outpatient chemotherapy13.295No Different Than the National Rate
Rate of emergency department (ED) visits for patients receiving outpatient chemotherapy5.995No Different Than the National Rate
Ratio of unplanned hospital visits after hospital outpatient surgery1.11,067No Different than expected
Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) 30-Day Readmission Rate14.3312No Different Than the National Rate
Rate of readmission for CABG11.4230No Different Than the National Rate
Rate of readmission for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients19.6240No Different Than the National Rate
Heart failure (HF) 30-Day Readmission Rate19.9697No Different Than the National Rate
Rate of readmission after hip/knee replacement4.7369No Different Than the National Rate
Pneumonia (PN) 30-Day Readmission Rate17.2742No Different Than the National Rate

What to ask: If this hospital has higher-than-average readmission rates, ask about their discharge process — do they provide follow-up appointments, medication reconciliation, and clear care instructions before you leave?

Nearby Hospitals

If Forrest General Hospital isn't in your Medicare plan's network — or you want to compare quality ratings before a procedure — these are the closest alternatives within 15 miles:

Merit Health Wesley

0 miles
★★☆☆☆ 2/5
Hattiesburg, MS · 211 beds

South Mississippi State Hospital

14.4 miles
Not Rated N/A
Purvis, MS · 50 beds

View all hospitals near 39403, MS →

Switching hospitals may mean switching plans. Check the Medicare enrollment timeline to make sure you don't miss your window, and use our enrollment checklist to stay organized.

Location & Directions

Address: 6051 Us Highway 49, Hattiesburg, MS 39401
Phone: (601) 288-7000

Get directions on Google Maps →

What to Do with This Information

Hospital quality data is most useful when paired with your specific situation. Here's how to act on it:

  • Check network status: Before choosing this hospital, verify it's in-network for your Medicare Advantage plan. Out-of-network care can cost significantly more.
  • Ask about specific outcomes: If you're considering an elective procedure, ask the hospital for their outcomes data on that specific surgery — not just overall ratings.
  • Compare nearby options: Use the nearby hospitals section above to compare quality scores across facilities in the area.
  • Review your Medicare plan: Your plan's network determines which hospitals you can access affordably. Use our enrollment checklist to stay organized if you're switching plans. Check enrollment deadlines →
  • Talk to your doctor: Ask your primary care physician which hospitals they're affiliated with and whether they're in-network for your plan. Print our doctor questions checklist →
View on Medicare.gov Compare Medicare Plans in 39403, MS →

Forrest General Hospital: Common Questions

What does a 2-star rating mean for Forrest General Hospital?

CMS rates hospitals on a 1-to-5 star scale based on quality measures across mortality, safety, readmission, patient experience, and timely care. A 2-star rating indicates this hospital is below the national average on some measures. The rating is updated quarterly by CMS.

Does Forrest General Hospital have an emergency room?

Yes, Forrest General Hospital operates an emergency department.

How many doctors are affiliated with Forrest General Hospital?

478 physicians are affiliated with this hospital according to CMS Physician Compare data. This includes 95 surgeons.

Does Forrest General Hospital accept Medicare?

Yes. All hospitals listed on Medicare Hospital Compare are Medicare-certified facilities. However, whether this hospital is in-network for your specific Medicare Advantage plan depends on your plan's provider network. Check your plan documents or call your insurer to verify.

How many beds does Forrest General Hospital have?

Forrest General Hospital has 537 licensed beds. Bed count is an indicator of hospital capacity — larger hospitals often offer more specialized services.

Where does the data on this page come from?

All data is sourced from official CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) databases: Hospital Compare for quality measures and star ratings, Provider of Services for beds and services, and Physician Compare for doctor affiliations. Data is updated quarterly. Read our full methodology →

About the Reviewer

Wes Ward

Wes Ward

Founder & Data Lead

Wes Ward is the founder of InsuranceDataNow.org and reviews all hospital quality data and methodology for accuracy. Every hospital profile — including the CMS quality measures, infection rates, and doctor affiliations on this page — goes through his data-validation pipeline before publication.

With 25+ years in data analytics — including work with highly regulated genomic data at Ancestry.com — Wes brings enterprise-level rigor to healthcare transparency. He is also a co-founder of BestNeighborhood.org, CrimeGrade.org, and ISPReports.org.

View full profile →LinkedIn

Data sources: CMS Hospital Compare (February 2026), Provider of Services (Q4 2025), CMS Physician Compare, CDC NHSN. This page is for informational purposes only. Always verify information directly with the hospital. Read our full methodology →

Medicare Resources

Hospital quality data is just one piece of the Medicare puzzle. Explore our guides to make the best decisions for your coverage:

Does your Medicare plan cover Forrest General Hospital?

Compare Plans in 39403, MS →