Hospital Profile

Missouri Delta Medical Center

1008 North Main St
Sikeston, MO 63801
★★☆☆☆
2/5 CMS Overall Rating
188
Licensed Beds
Acute Care
Hospital Type
229
Affiliated Doctors
Limited
Critical Care
0.6:1
Nurse-to-Bed Ratio
Data Source: Hospital data from CMS Hospital Compare (February 2026) and Provider of Services file (Q4 2025). Doctor affiliations from CMS Physician Compare. Quality measures are updated quarterly.
Reviewed by: Wes Ward, Founder & Data Lead • View our methodology

Hospital Details

Missouri Delta Medical Center is a 2.00-star acute care hospital located in Sikeston, Missouri with 188 licensed beds. As a private non-profit, its revenue is reinvested into patient care and community programs.

Its 2-star CMS rating is below the national average, which may indicate opportunities for improvement across quality domains. 229 physicians are affiliated with this facility, and it provides emergency services. Its critical care footprint covers 2 of 8 unit types (Limited) with a 0.6:1 nurse-to-bed ratio.

Hospital Type Acute Care Hospitals
Ownership Voluntary non-profit - Private
Teaching Status Non-Teaching Hospital

Quality Ratings & Measures

CMS evaluates hospitals across five quality domains. Here's how Missouri Delta Medical Center compares:

2
Overall Rating
of 5 stars
💔
Same as National
Mortality
0 of 4 better
🛡️
Same as National
Safety
0 of 3 better
🔄
Better than National
Readmission
1 of 8 better
😊
All 8 domains reported
Patient Experience
8 measures
💰
1.0000
Medicare Spending Index (MSPB)
Near National Avg

Quality data from CMS Hospital Compare. "Better than national" means statistically significantly better than the national average. Spending uses the CMS MSPB measure (Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary) index, where 1.000 is national average and values above/below 1.000 indicate higher/lower spending.

Patient Experience (HCAHPS Survey)

The HCAHPS survey is a standardized, national survey of hospital patients. It measures how patients perceive their care — including communication with doctors and nurses, responsiveness of staff, cleanliness, and discharge information. Higher percentages indicate better performance.

MeasureScoreStar Rating
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Always" clean68%N/A
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Sometimes" or "Never" clean14%N/A
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Usually" clean18%N/A
Cleanliness - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Cleanliness - star ratingNot Applicable%★★☆☆☆ (2)
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" communicated well73%N/A
Nurse communication - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well6%N/A
Nurse communication - star ratingNot Applicable%★★☆☆☆ (2)
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" communicated well21%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" communicated well79%N/A
Doctor communication - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well6%N/A
Doctor communication - star ratingNot Applicable%★★★☆☆ (3)
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" communicated well15%N/A
Patients who reported that staff "Always" explained about medicines before giving it to them58%N/A
Communication about medicines - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Patients who reported that staff "Sometimes" or "Never" explained about medicines before giving it to them25%N/A
Communication about medicines - star ratingNot Applicable%★★☆☆☆ (2)
Patients who reported that staff "Usually" explained about medicines before giving it to them17%N/A
Discharge information - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Patients who reported that NO, they were not given information about what to do during their recovery at home17%N/A
Discharge information - star ratingNot Applicable%★★☆☆☆ (2)
Patients who reported that YES, they were given information about what to do during their recovery at home83%N/A
Patients who reported that NO, they did not discuss whether they would need help after discharge18%N/A
Patients who reported that YES, they did discuss whether they would need help after discharge82%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" explained things in a way they could understand71%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand7%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand22%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" listened carefully to them79%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them6%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" listened carefully to them15%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect86%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect4%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect10%N/A
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 6 or lower on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)9%N/A
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 7 or 8 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)34%N/A
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 9 or 10 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)57%N/A
Overall hospital rating - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Overall hospital rating - star ratingNot Applicable%★★★☆☆ (3)
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" communicated what the medication was for75%N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated what the medication was for11%N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" communicated what the medication was for.14%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" explained things in a way they could understand69%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand7%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand24%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" listened carefully to them70%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them7%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" listened carefully to them23%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect81%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect4%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect15%N/A
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Always" quiet at night58%N/A
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Sometimes" or "Never" quiet at night10%N/A
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Usually" quiet at night32%N/A
Quietness - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Quietness - star ratingNot Applicable%★★★☆☆ (3)
Patients who reported NO, they would probably not or definitely not recommend the hospital7%N/A
Patients who reported YES, they would definitely recommend the hospital54%N/A
Recommend hospital - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Patients who reported YES, they would probably recommend the hospital39%N/A
Recommend hospital - star ratingNot Applicable%★★☆☆☆ (2)
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" discussed possible side effects41%N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" discussed possible side effects39%N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" discussed possible side effects20%N/A
Summary star ratingNot Applicable%★★☆☆☆ (2)
Patients who reported that NO, they did not receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge15%N/A
Patients who reported that YES, they did receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge85%N/A

Survey response rate: 12% (269 surveys completed). Data from 04/01/2024 to 03/31/2025 .

Services & Specialties

Missouri Delta Medical Center offers the following services based on CMS Provider of Services data:

Emergency & Critical Care

Missouri Delta Medical Center offers 2 of 8 possible critical care capabilities, classified as Limited. Limited critical care (1–2 unit types) means this facility can stabilize patients but may need to transfer more serious cases. If you anticipate needing emergency or ICU services frequently, compare nearby alternatives in the nearby hospitals section.

🏥 Intensive Care Unit (ICU)
🔥 Burn Care Unit

Surgical Services

🏥 Inpatient Surgery
🏢 Outpatient Surgery
👁️ Ophthalmic Surgery

Specialty Services

🤰 Obstetrics (OB)
👶 Neonatal Nursery
🧒 Pediatric Services
🌬️ Respiratory Care
👴 Gerontology

Service availability is self-reported by the facility. Confirm specific services directly with the hospital. Use our printable question list to prepare for the conversation.

Bed Count, Capacity & Staffing

Missouri Delta Medical Center has 188 licensed beds (188 Medicare-certified) with a nurse-to-bed ratio of 0.6:1. Higher ratios generally indicate more nursing staff per patient, which research links to better outcomes in medication errors, patient falls, and response times.

Bed Type Count
Total Licensed Beds188
CMS Certified Beds188
Psychiatric Unit Beds12
Staffing snapshot: 229 affiliated physicians • 110 registered nurses • 6 operating rooms

Doctors Affiliated with Missouri Delta Medical Center

229 physicians are affiliated with Missouri Delta Medical Center, including 34 surgeons. Doctor affiliations are sourced from CMS Physician Compare data and indicate physicians who have a formal relationship with this hospital.

229
Total Doctors
41
Procedural Specialists
34
Surgeons

Featured Affiliated Physicians

Michael R. Freeman
Upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy for acid reflux
NPI: 1851361455
Kenneth J. Barkett
Cataract surgery
NPI: 1952389462
Wilson P. Pais
Upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy for acid reflux
NPI: 1407982200
David G. Yingling
Laminectomy or laminotomy (partial removal of spine bones)
NPI: 1245236157
Charity A. Jacobs
Knee replacement
NPI: 1962764183
Brandon J. Scott
Spinal fusion
NPI: 1770740516

Showing 229 of 229 affiliated physicians. Doctor affiliations from CMS Physician Compare data.

Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAI)

Healthcare-associated infections are one of the most important safety metrics when evaluating a hospital. These infections are acquired during a hospital stay, not the reason for admission. CMS tracks rates for specific infection types and compares each hospital to the national benchmark.

Infection TypeScore (SIR)vs. National
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence LimitNot AvailableNot Available
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence LimitNot AvailableNot Available
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection: Number of Device Days668Not Available
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases0.486Not Available
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases1Not Available
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards)Not AvailableNot Available
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence LimitN/ANo Different than National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit1.336No Different than National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Number of Urinary Catheter Days3220No Different than National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases2.243No Different than National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases0No Different than National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards)0.000No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Colon Surgery: Lower Confidence LimitNot AvailableNot Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Upper Confidence LimitNot AvailableNot Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Number of Procedures13Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Predicted Cases0.318Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Observed Cases0Not Available
SSI - Colon SurgeryNot AvailableNot Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Lower Confidence LimitNot AvailableNot Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Upper Confidence LimitNot AvailableNot Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Number of Procedures84Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Predicted Cases0.695Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Observed Cases0Not Available
SSI - Abdominal HysterectomyNot AvailableNot Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Lower Confidence LimitNot AvailableNot Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Upper Confidence LimitNot AvailableNot Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Patient Days12046Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Predicted Cases0.492Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Observed Cases0Not Available
MRSA BacteremiaNot AvailableNot Available
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Lower Confidence Limit0.664No Different than National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Upper Confidence Limit2.194No Different than National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Patient Days11141No Different than National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Predicted Cases8.716No Different than National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Observed Cases11No Different than National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff)1.262No Different than National Benchmark

How to read this: "Better than national" means the hospital's infection rate is statistically significantly lower than the national average — a sign of strong infection-control protocols (hand hygiene, sterilization, catheter management). "Worse than national" may warrant asking the hospital about their improvement initiatives.

Infection data reported to the CDC's National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN).

Complications & Deaths

CMS tracks post-surgical complications and mortality rates for common procedures and conditions (heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, hip/knee replacement, and more). These measures reflect how patients actually fare at this hospital compared to the national average.

MeasureScorePatientsvs. National
Rate of complications for hip/knee replacement patientsN/AN/ANumber of Cases Too Small
Hybrid Hospital-Wide All-Cause Risk Standardized Mortality Rate5.2410Worse Than the National Rate
Death rate for heart attack patientsN/AN/ANumber of Cases Too Small
Death rate for CABG surgery patientsN/AN/ANot Available
Death rate for COPD patients10.277No Different Than the National Rate
Death rate for heart failure patients14.5120No Different Than the National Rate
Death rate for pneumonia patients21.7173Worse Than the National Rate
Death rate for stroke patients16.651No Different Than the National Rate
Pressure ulcer rate0.401,317No Different Than the National Rate
Death rate among surgical inpatients with serious treatable complicationsN/AN/ANumber of Cases Too Small
Iatrogenic pneumothorax rate0.201,553No Different Than the National Rate
In-hospital fall-associated fracture rate0.341,567No Different Than the National Rate
Postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma rate2.26172No Different Than the National Rate
Postoperative acute kidney injury requiring dialysis rate1.6350No Different Than the National Rate
Postoperative respiratory failure rate10.8752No Different Than the National Rate
Perioperative pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis rate3.71187No Different Than the National Rate
Postoperative sepsis rate5.0736No Different Than the National Rate
Postoperative wound dehiscence rate2.0932No Different Than the National Rate
Abdominopelvic accidental puncture or laceration rate1.02125No Different Than the National Rate
CMS Medicare PSI 90: Patient safety and adverse events composite0.98N/ANo Different Than the National Value

What to consider: A "worse than national" rating on mortality or complications is a serious signal — particularly for elective procedures where you have time to choose a facility. For emergency care, proximity and speed often outweigh these metrics. Ask the hospital about their outcomes for your specific procedure.

Readmissions & Unplanned Hospital Visits

A readmission means a patient returned to the hospital within 30 days of discharge. High readmission rates can signal gaps in discharge planning, patient education, or follow-up care coordination. CMS penalizes hospitals with excess readmissions through the HRRP.

MeasureScorePatientsvs. National
Hospital return days for heart attack patientsN/A0Number of Cases Too Small
Hospital return days for heart failure patients1.8131Average Days per 100 Discharges
Hospital return days for pneumonia patients1.4167Average Days per 100 Discharges
Hybrid Hospital-Wide All-Cause Readmission Measure (HWR)15.3603No Different Than the National Rate
Rate of unplanned hospital visits after colonoscopy (per 1,000 colonoscopies)12.5480No Different Than the National Rate
Rate of inpatient admissions for patients receiving outpatient chemotherapy10.933No Different Than the National Rate
Rate of emergency department (ED) visits for patients receiving outpatient chemotherapy5.733No Different Than the National Rate
Ratio of unplanned hospital visits after hospital outpatient surgery0.9152No Different than expected
Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) 30-Day Readmission RateN/A0Number of Cases Too Small
Rate of readmission for CABGN/A0Not Available
Rate of readmission for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients17.684No Different Than the National Rate
Heart failure (HF) 30-Day Readmission Rate20.1131No Different Than the National Rate
Rate of readmission after hip/knee replacementN/A0Number of Cases Too Small
Pneumonia (PN) 30-Day Readmission Rate15.7167No Different Than the National Rate

What to ask: If this hospital has higher-than-average readmission rates, ask about their discharge process — do they provide follow-up appointments, medication reconciliation, and clear care instructions before you leave?

Nearby Hospitals

If Missouri Delta Medical Center isn't in your Medicare plan's network — or you want to compare quality ratings before a procedure — these are the closest alternatives within 50 miles:

Mercy Hospital Stoddard

22 miles
★★★☆☆ 3/5
Dexter, MO · 50 beds

Southeast Behavioral Hospital

27.5 miles
Not Rated N/A
Cape Girardeau, MO · 102 beds

Saint Francis Medical Center

28.6 miles
★★☆☆☆ 2/5
Cape Girardeau, MO · 308 beds

Mercy Hospital Southeast

29.2 miles
★★☆☆☆ 2/5
Cape Girardeau, MO · 281 beds

Baptist Memorial Hospital Union City

43.4 miles
★★★★★ 5/5
Union City, TN · 137 beds

Deaconess Illinois Union County

43.8 miles
Not Rated N/A
Anna, IL · 25 beds

Choate Mental Health & Development Ctr

44.8 miles
Not Rated N/A
Anna, IL · 113 beds

Pemiscot County Memorial Hospital

45.9 miles
Not Rated N/A
Hayti, MO · 167 beds

Poplar Bluff Va Medical Center

46.8 miles
Not Rated N/A
Poplar Bluff, MO · 179 beds

Poplar Bluff Regional Medical Center

48 miles
★★☆☆☆ 2/5
Poplar Bluff, MO · 230 beds

Piggott Community Hospital

48.8 miles
★★★☆☆ 3/5
Piggott, AR · 25 beds

View all hospitals near 63801, MO →

Switching hospitals may mean switching plans. Check the Medicare enrollment timeline to make sure you don't miss your window, and use our enrollment checklist to stay organized.

Location & Directions

Address: 1008 North Main St, Sikeston, MO 63801
Phone: (573) 472-7586

Get directions on Google Maps →

What to Do with This Information

Hospital quality data is most useful when paired with your specific situation. Here's how to act on it:

  • Check network status: Before choosing this hospital, verify it's in-network for your Medicare Advantage plan. Out-of-network care can cost significantly more.
  • Ask about specific outcomes: If you're considering an elective procedure, ask the hospital for their outcomes data on that specific surgery — not just overall ratings.
  • Compare nearby options: Use the nearby hospitals section above to compare quality scores across facilities in the area.
  • Review your Medicare plan: Your plan's network determines which hospitals you can access affordably. Use our enrollment checklist to stay organized if you're switching plans. Check enrollment deadlines →
  • Talk to your doctor: Ask your primary care physician which hospitals they're affiliated with and whether they're in-network for your plan. Print our doctor questions checklist →
View on Medicare.gov Compare Medicare Plans in 63801, MO →

Missouri Delta Medical Center: Common Questions

What does a 2-star rating mean for Missouri Delta Medical Center?

CMS rates hospitals on a 1-to-5 star scale based on quality measures across mortality, safety, readmission, patient experience, and timely care. A 2-star rating indicates this hospital is below the national average on some measures. The rating is updated quarterly by CMS.

Does Missouri Delta Medical Center have an emergency room?

Yes, Missouri Delta Medical Center operates an emergency department.

How many doctors are affiliated with Missouri Delta Medical Center?

229 physicians are affiliated with this hospital according to CMS Physician Compare data. This includes 34 surgeons.

Does Missouri Delta Medical Center accept Medicare?

Yes. All hospitals listed on Medicare Hospital Compare are Medicare-certified facilities. However, whether this hospital is in-network for your specific Medicare Advantage plan depends on your plan's provider network. Check your plan documents or call your insurer to verify.

How many beds does Missouri Delta Medical Center have?

Missouri Delta Medical Center has 188 licensed beds. Bed count is an indicator of hospital capacity — larger hospitals often offer more specialized services.

Where does the data on this page come from?

All data is sourced from official CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) databases: Hospital Compare for quality measures and star ratings, Provider of Services for beds and services, and Physician Compare for doctor affiliations. Data is updated quarterly. Read our full methodology →

About the Reviewer

Wes Ward

Wes Ward

Founder & Data Lead

Wes Ward is the founder of InsuranceDataNow.org and reviews all hospital quality data and methodology for accuracy. Every hospital profile — including the CMS quality measures, infection rates, and doctor affiliations on this page — goes through his data-validation pipeline before publication.

With 25+ years in data analytics — including work with highly regulated genomic data at Ancestry.com — Wes brings enterprise-level rigor to healthcare transparency. He is also a co-founder of BestNeighborhood.org, CrimeGrade.org, and ISPReports.org.

View full profile →LinkedIn

Data sources: CMS Hospital Compare (February 2026), Provider of Services (Q4 2025), CMS Physician Compare, CDC NHSN. This page is for informational purposes only. Always verify information directly with the hospital. Read our full methodology →

Medicare Resources

Hospital quality data is just one piece of the Medicare puzzle. Explore our guides to make the best decisions for your coverage:

Does your Medicare plan cover Missouri Delta Medical Center?

Compare Plans in 63801, MO →