Hospital Profile

Salina Regional Health Center

400 South Santa Fe Avenue
Salina, KS 67401
★★★☆☆
3/5 CMS Overall Rating
396
Licensed Beds
Acute Care
Hospital Type
294
Affiliated Doctors
Comprehensive
Critical Care
0.9:1
Nurse-to-Bed Ratio
Data Source: Hospital data from CMS Hospital Compare (February 2026) and Provider of Services file (Q4 2025). Doctor affiliations from CMS Physician Compare. Quality measures are updated quarterly.
Reviewed by: Wes Ward, Founder & Data Lead • View our methodology

Hospital Details

Salina Regional Health Center is a 3.00-star acute care hospital located in Salina, Kansas with 396 licensed beds. As a private non-profit, its revenue is reinvested into patient care and community programs. It maintains a limited teaching affiliation with a medical school.

Its 3-star CMS rating is at the national average — it meets baseline quality standards across key domains. 294 physicians are affiliated with this facility, and it provides emergency services. Its critical care footprint covers 7 of 8 unit types (Comprehensive) with a 0.9:1 nurse-to-bed ratio.

Hospital Type Acute Care Hospitals
Ownership Voluntary non-profit - Private
Teaching Status Limited Teaching Hospital

Quality Ratings & Measures

CMS evaluates hospitals across five quality domains. Here's how Salina Regional Health Center compares:

3
Overall Rating
of 5 stars
💔
Worse than National
Mortality
0 of 7 better
🛡️
Same as National
Safety
0 of 7 better
🔄
Better than National
Readmission
1 of 11 better
😊
All 8 domains reported
Patient Experience
8 measures
💰
1.0500
Medicare Spending Index (MSPB)
Above National Avg (Higher Spending)

Quality data from CMS Hospital Compare. "Better than national" means statistically significantly better than the national average. Spending uses the CMS MSPB measure (Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary) index, where 1.000 is national average and values above/below 1.000 indicate higher/lower spending.

Patient Experience (HCAHPS Survey)

The HCAHPS survey is a standardized, national survey of hospital patients. It measures how patients perceive their care — including communication with doctors and nurses, responsiveness of staff, cleanliness, and discharge information. Higher percentages indicate better performance.

MeasureScoreStar Rating
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Always" clean67%N/A
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Sometimes" or "Never" clean10%N/A
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Usually" clean23%N/A
Cleanliness - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Cleanliness - star ratingNot Applicable%★★★☆☆ (3)
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" communicated well76%N/A
Nurse communication - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well4%N/A
Nurse communication - star ratingNot Applicable%★★★☆☆ (3)
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" communicated well20%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" communicated well80%N/A
Doctor communication - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well4%N/A
Doctor communication - star ratingNot Applicable%★★★★☆ (4)
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" communicated well16%N/A
Patients who reported that staff "Always" explained about medicines before giving it to them58%N/A
Communication about medicines - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Patients who reported that staff "Sometimes" or "Never" explained about medicines before giving it to them20%N/A
Communication about medicines - star ratingNot Applicable%★★☆☆☆ (2)
Patients who reported that staff "Usually" explained about medicines before giving it to them22%N/A
Discharge information - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Patients who reported that NO, they were not given information about what to do during their recovery at home12%N/A
Discharge information - star ratingNot Applicable%★★★★☆ (4)
Patients who reported that YES, they were given information about what to do during their recovery at home88%N/A
Patients who reported that NO, they did not discuss whether they would need help after discharge14%N/A
Patients who reported that YES, they did discuss whether they would need help after discharge86%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" explained things in a way they could understand72%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand6%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand22%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" listened carefully to them80%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them4%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" listened carefully to them16%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect87%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect2%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect11%N/A
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 6 or lower on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)9%N/A
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 7 or 8 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)26%N/A
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 9 or 10 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)65%N/A
Overall hospital rating - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Overall hospital rating - star ratingNot Applicable%★★★☆☆ (3)
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" communicated what the medication was for71%N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated what the medication was for10%N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" communicated what the medication was for.19%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" explained things in a way they could understand70%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand6%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand24%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" listened carefully to them73%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them5%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" listened carefully to them22%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect85%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect2%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect13%N/A
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Always" quiet at night57%N/A
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Sometimes" or "Never" quiet at night8%N/A
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Usually" quiet at night35%N/A
Quietness - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Quietness - star ratingNot Applicable%★★★☆☆ (3)
Patients who reported NO, they would probably not or definitely not recommend the hospital5%N/A
Patients who reported YES, they would definitely recommend the hospital63%N/A
Recommend hospital - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Patients who reported YES, they would probably recommend the hospital32%N/A
Recommend hospital - star ratingNot Applicable%★★★☆☆ (3)
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" discussed possible side effects46%N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" discussed possible side effects31%N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" discussed possible side effects23%N/A
Summary star ratingNot Applicable%★★★☆☆ (3)
Patients who reported that NO, they did not receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge10%N/A
Patients who reported that YES, they did receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge90%N/A

Survey response rate: 26% (693 surveys completed). Data from 04/01/2024 to 03/31/2025 .

Services & Specialties

Salina Regional Health Center offers the following services based on CMS Provider of Services data:

Emergency & Critical Care

Salina Regional Health Center offers 7 of 8 possible critical care capabilities, classified as Comprehensive. Comprehensive critical care hospitals (6+ unit types) are typically equipped to handle the widest range of emergencies, from cardiac events and severe burns to pediatric and neonatal crises — a key factor in plan selection for families or those with complex health needs.

🚨 Emergency Department
🏥 Intensive Care Unit (ICU)
🔬 Surgical ICU
❤️ Coronary Care Unit (CCU)
🆘 Shock-Trauma
👶 Pediatric ICU
🍼 Neonatal ICU (NICU)

Surgical Services

🏥 Inpatient Surgery
🏢 Outpatient Surgery
❤️ Open-Heart Surgery
🧠 Neurosurgery
💓 Cardiac Catheterization Lab

Specialty Services

🤰 Obstetrics (OB)
👶 Neonatal Nursery
🧒 Pediatric Services
🧠 Psychiatric Services
💉 Chemotherapy
🌬️ Respiratory Care

Service availability is self-reported by the facility. Confirm specific services directly with the hospital. Use our printable question list to prepare for the conversation.

Bed Count, Capacity & Staffing

Salina Regional Health Center has 396 licensed beds (396 Medicare-certified) with a nurse-to-bed ratio of 0.9:1. Higher ratios generally indicate more nursing staff per patient, which research links to better outcomes in medication errors, patient falls, and response times.

Bed Type Count
Total Licensed Beds396
CMS Certified Beds396
Psychiatric Unit Beds15
Staffing snapshot: 294 affiliated physicians • 354 registered nurses • 9 operating rooms

Doctors Affiliated with Salina Regional Health Center

294 physicians are affiliated with Salina Regional Health Center, including 57 surgeons. Doctor affiliations are sourced from CMS Physician Compare data and indicate physicians who have a formal relationship with this hospital.

294
Total Doctors
66
Procedural Specialists
57
Surgeons

Featured Affiliated Physicians

Paul A. Johnson
Upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy for acid reflux
NPI: 1720043045
Jesica R. Brown
Upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy for acid reflux
NPI: 1700173754
Sukesh K. Kansal
Cataract surgery
NPI: 1760479240
Lee G. Weiner
Cataract surgery
NPI: 1649763095
Gary B. Weiner
Cataract surgery
NPI: 1336143213
Scott M. Boswell
Spinal fusion
NPI: 1801093224

Showing 294 of 294 affiliated physicians. Doctor affiliations from CMS Physician Compare data.

Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAI)

Healthcare-associated infections are one of the most important safety metrics when evaluating a hospital. These infections are acquired during a hospital stay, not the reason for admission. CMS tracks rates for specific infection types and compares each hospital to the national benchmark.

Infection TypeScore (SIR)vs. National
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit0.020No Different than National Benchmark
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit1.966No Different than National Benchmark
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection: Number of Device Days3114No Different than National Benchmark
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases2.509No Different than National Benchmark
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases1No Different than National Benchmark
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards)0.399No Different than National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit0.276No Different than National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit2.956No Different than National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Number of Urinary Catheter Days3470No Different than National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases2.762No Different than National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases3No Different than National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards)1.086No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Colon Surgery: Lower Confidence Limit0.515No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Colon Surgery: Upper Confidence Limit3.911No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Colon Surgery: Number of Procedures95No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Colon Surgery: Predicted Cases2.467No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Colon Surgery: Observed Cases4No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Colon Surgery1.621No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Lower Confidence LimitNot AvailableNot Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Upper Confidence LimitNot AvailableNot Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Number of Procedures15Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Predicted Cases0.125Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Observed Cases0Not Available
SSI - Abdominal HysterectomyNot AvailableNot Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Lower Confidence Limit0.707No Different than National Benchmark
MRSA Bacteremia: Upper Confidence Limit7.567No Different than National Benchmark
MRSA Bacteremia: Patient Days30134No Different than National Benchmark
MRSA Bacteremia: Predicted Cases1.079No Different than National Benchmark
MRSA Bacteremia: Observed Cases3No Different than National Benchmark
MRSA Bacteremia2.780No Different than National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Lower Confidence Limit0.445No Different than National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Upper Confidence Limit1.280No Different than National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Patient Days27615No Different than National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Predicted Cases17.919No Different than National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Observed Cases14No Different than National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff)0.781No Different than National Benchmark

How to read this: "Better than national" means the hospital's infection rate is statistically significantly lower than the national average — a sign of strong infection-control protocols (hand hygiene, sterilization, catheter management). "Worse than national" may warrant asking the hospital about their improvement initiatives.

Infection data reported to the CDC's National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN).

Complications & Deaths

CMS tracks post-surgical complications and mortality rates for common procedures and conditions (heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, hip/knee replacement, and more). These measures reflect how patients actually fare at this hospital compared to the national average.

MeasureScorePatientsvs. National
Rate of complications for hip/knee replacement patients3.798No Different Than the National Rate
Hybrid Hospital-Wide All-Cause Risk Standardized Mortality Rate4.21,232No Different Than the National Rate
Death rate for heart attack patients12.6118No Different Than the National Rate
Death rate for CABG surgery patients3.872No Different Than the National Rate
Death rate for COPD patients10.2125No Different Than the National Rate
Death rate for heart failure patients17.2157Worse Than the National Rate
Death rate for pneumonia patients18.7301No Different Than the National Rate
Death rate for stroke patients14.9108No Different Than the National Rate
Pressure ulcer rate0.643,330No Different Than the National Rate
Death rate among surgical inpatients with serious treatable complications198.2471No Different Than the National Rate
Iatrogenic pneumothorax rate0.164,468No Different Than the National Rate
In-hospital fall-associated fracture rate0.274,440No Different Than the National Rate
Postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma rate2.621,407No Different Than the National Rate
Postoperative acute kidney injury requiring dialysis rate3.01642No Different Than the National Rate
Postoperative respiratory failure rate15.97669Worse Than the National Rate
Perioperative pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis rate2.681,511No Different Than the National Rate
Postoperative sepsis rate4.28633No Different Than the National Rate
Postoperative wound dehiscence rate1.57428No Different Than the National Rate
Abdominopelvic accidental puncture or laceration rate1.19991No Different Than the National Rate
CMS Medicare PSI 90: Patient safety and adverse events composite1.16N/ANo Different Than the National Value

What to consider: A "worse than national" rating on mortality or complications is a serious signal — particularly for elective procedures where you have time to choose a facility. For emergency care, proximity and speed often outweigh these metrics. Ask the hospital about their outcomes for your specific procedure.

Readmissions & Unplanned Hospital Visits

A readmission means a patient returned to the hospital within 30 days of discharge. High readmission rates can signal gaps in discharge planning, patient education, or follow-up care coordination. CMS penalizes hospitals with excess readmissions through the HRRP.

MeasureScorePatientsvs. National
Hospital return days for heart attack patients0.9156Average Days per 100 Discharges
Hospital return days for heart failure patients-19.6162Fewer Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
Hospital return days for pneumonia patients-35.6317Fewer Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
Hybrid Hospital-Wide All-Cause Readmission Measure (HWR)13.21,796Better Than the National Rate
Rate of unplanned hospital visits after colonoscopy (per 1,000 colonoscopies)14.6716No Different Than the National Rate
Rate of inpatient admissions for patients receiving outpatient chemotherapy10.8241No Different Than the National Rate
Rate of emergency department (ED) visits for patients receiving outpatient chemotherapy5.7241No Different Than the National Rate
Ratio of unplanned hospital visits after hospital outpatient surgery1.1624No Different than expected
Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) 30-Day Readmission Rate12.5156No Different Than the National Rate
Rate of readmission for CABG10.366No Different Than the National Rate
Rate of readmission for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients17.3133No Different Than the National Rate
Heart failure (HF) 30-Day Readmission Rate18162No Different Than the National Rate
Rate of readmission after hip/knee replacement4.997No Different Than the National Rate
Pneumonia (PN) 30-Day Readmission Rate13.7317No Different Than the National Rate

What to ask: If this hospital has higher-than-average readmission rates, ask about their discharge process — do they provide follow-up appointments, medication reconciliation, and clear care instructions before you leave?

Nearby Hospitals

If Salina Regional Health Center isn't in your Medicare plan's network — or you want to compare quality ratings before a procedure — these are the closest alternatives within 15 miles:

Salina Surgical Hospital

0.1 miles
Not Rated N/A
Salina, KS · 16 beds

View all hospitals near 67401, KS →

Switching hospitals may mean switching plans. Check the Medicare enrollment timeline to make sure you don't miss your window, and use our enrollment checklist to stay organized.

Location & Directions

Address: 400 South Santa Fe Avenue, Salina, KS 67401
Phone: (785) 452-7000

Get directions on Google Maps →

What to Do with This Information

Hospital quality data is most useful when paired with your specific situation. Here's how to act on it:

  • Check network status: Before choosing this hospital, verify it's in-network for your Medicare Advantage plan. Out-of-network care can cost significantly more.
  • Ask about specific outcomes: If you're considering an elective procedure, ask the hospital for their outcomes data on that specific surgery — not just overall ratings.
  • Compare nearby options: Use the nearby hospitals section above to compare quality scores across facilities in the area.
  • Review your Medicare plan: Your plan's network determines which hospitals you can access affordably. Use our enrollment checklist to stay organized if you're switching plans. Check enrollment deadlines →
  • Talk to your doctor: Ask your primary care physician which hospitals they're affiliated with and whether they're in-network for your plan. Print our doctor questions checklist →
View on Medicare.gov Compare Medicare Plans in 67401, KS →

Salina Regional Health Center: Common Questions

What does a 3-star rating mean for Salina Regional Health Center?

CMS rates hospitals on a 1-to-5 star scale based on quality measures across mortality, safety, readmission, patient experience, and timely care. A 3-star rating means this hospital meets the national average across these domains. The rating is updated quarterly by CMS.

Does Salina Regional Health Center have an emergency room?

Yes, Salina Regional Health Center operates an emergency department.

How many doctors are affiliated with Salina Regional Health Center?

294 physicians are affiliated with this hospital according to CMS Physician Compare data. This includes 57 surgeons.

Does Salina Regional Health Center accept Medicare?

Yes. All hospitals listed on Medicare Hospital Compare are Medicare-certified facilities. However, whether this hospital is in-network for your specific Medicare Advantage plan depends on your plan's provider network. Check your plan documents or call your insurer to verify.

How many beds does Salina Regional Health Center have?

Salina Regional Health Center has 396 licensed beds. Bed count is an indicator of hospital capacity — larger hospitals often offer more specialized services.

Where does the data on this page come from?

All data is sourced from official CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) databases: Hospital Compare for quality measures and star ratings, Provider of Services for beds and services, and Physician Compare for doctor affiliations. Data is updated quarterly. Read our full methodology →

About the Reviewer

Wes Ward

Wes Ward

Founder & Data Lead

Wes Ward is the founder of InsuranceDataNow.org and reviews all hospital quality data and methodology for accuracy. Every hospital profile — including the CMS quality measures, infection rates, and doctor affiliations on this page — goes through his data-validation pipeline before publication.

With 25+ years in data analytics — including work with highly regulated genomic data at Ancestry.com — Wes brings enterprise-level rigor to healthcare transparency. He is also a co-founder of BestNeighborhood.org, CrimeGrade.org, and ISPReports.org.

View full profile →LinkedIn

Data sources: CMS Hospital Compare (February 2026), Provider of Services (Q4 2025), CMS Physician Compare, CDC NHSN. This page is for informational purposes only. Always verify information directly with the hospital. Read our full methodology →

Medicare Resources

Hospital quality data is just one piece of the Medicare puzzle. Explore our guides to make the best decisions for your coverage:

Does your Medicare plan cover Salina Regional Health Center?

Compare Plans in 67401, KS →