Hospital Profile

National Park Medical Center

1910 Malvern Avenue
Hot Springs, AR 71901
★☆☆☆☆
1/5 CMS Overall Rating
163
Licensed Beds
Acute Care
Hospital Type
147
Affiliated Doctors
Moderate
Critical Care
0.9:1
Nurse-to-Bed Ratio
Data Source: Hospital data from CMS Hospital Compare (February 2026) and Provider of Services file (Q4 2025). Doctor affiliations from CMS Physician Compare. Quality measures are updated quarterly.
Reviewed by: Wes Ward, Founder & Data Lead • View our methodology

Hospital Details

National Park Medical Center is a 1.00-star acute care hospital located in Hot Springs, Arkansas with 163 licensed beds. As a for-profit facility, it operates with a different financial structure than non-profit hospitals in the region.

A 1-star CMS rating indicates this hospital scores well below the national average. Consider reviewing individual quality domains below for more context. 147 physicians are affiliated with this facility, and it provides emergency services. Its critical care footprint covers 4 of 8 unit types (Moderate) with a 0.9:1 nurse-to-bed ratio.

Hospital Type Acute Care Hospitals
Ownership Proprietary
Teaching Status Non-Teaching Hospital

Quality Ratings & Measures

CMS evaluates hospitals across five quality domains. Here's how National Park Medical Center compares:

1
Overall Rating
of 5 stars
💔
Same as National
Mortality
0 of 7 better
🛡️
Better than National
Safety
1 of 7 better
🔄
Worse than National
Readmission
0 of 9 better
😊
All 8 domains reported
Patient Experience
8 measures
💰
1.1800
Medicare Spending Index (MSPB)
Above National Avg (Higher Spending)

Quality data from CMS Hospital Compare. "Better than national" means statistically significantly better than the national average. Spending uses the CMS MSPB measure (Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary) index, where 1.000 is national average and values above/below 1.000 indicate higher/lower spending.

Patient Experience (HCAHPS Survey)

The HCAHPS survey is a standardized, national survey of hospital patients. It measures how patients perceive their care — including communication with doctors and nurses, responsiveness of staff, cleanliness, and discharge information. Higher percentages indicate better performance.

MeasureScoreStar Rating
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Always" clean62%N/A
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Sometimes" or "Never" clean16%N/A
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Usually" clean22%N/A
Cleanliness - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Cleanliness - star ratingNot Applicable%★★☆☆☆ (2)
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" communicated well73%N/A
Nurse communication - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well9%N/A
Nurse communication - star ratingNot Applicable%★★☆☆☆ (2)
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" communicated well18%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" communicated well72%N/A
Doctor communication - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well10%N/A
Doctor communication - star ratingNot Applicable%★★☆☆☆ (2)
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" communicated well18%N/A
Patients who reported that staff "Always" explained about medicines before giving it to them54%N/A
Communication about medicines - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Patients who reported that staff "Sometimes" or "Never" explained about medicines before giving it to them29%N/A
Communication about medicines - star ratingNot Applicable%★☆☆☆☆ (1)
Patients who reported that staff "Usually" explained about medicines before giving it to them17%N/A
Discharge information - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Patients who reported that NO, they were not given information about what to do during their recovery at home20%N/A
Discharge information - star ratingNot Applicable%★★☆☆☆ (2)
Patients who reported that YES, they were given information about what to do during their recovery at home80%N/A
Patients who reported that NO, they did not discuss whether they would need help after discharge22%N/A
Patients who reported that YES, they did discuss whether they would need help after discharge78%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" explained things in a way they could understand66%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand12%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand22%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" listened carefully to them71%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them11%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" listened carefully to them18%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect79%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect7%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect14%N/A
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 6 or lower on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)16%N/A
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 7 or 8 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)21%N/A
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 9 or 10 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)63%N/A
Overall hospital rating - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Overall hospital rating - star ratingNot Applicable%★★☆☆☆ (2)
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" communicated what the medication was for66%N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated what the medication was for16%N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" communicated what the medication was for.18%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" explained things in a way they could understand67%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand11%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand22%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" listened carefully to them71%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them8%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" listened carefully to them21%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect81%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect7%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect12%N/A
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Always" quiet at night55%N/A
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Sometimes" or "Never" quiet at night14%N/A
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Usually" quiet at night31%N/A
Quietness - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Quietness - star ratingNot Applicable%★★☆☆☆ (2)
Patients who reported NO, they would probably not or definitely not recommend the hospital10%N/A
Patients who reported YES, they would definitely recommend the hospital63%N/A
Recommend hospital - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Patients who reported YES, they would probably recommend the hospital27%N/A
Recommend hospital - star ratingNot Applicable%★★☆☆☆ (2)
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" discussed possible side effects41%N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" discussed possible side effects42%N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" discussed possible side effects17%N/A
Summary star ratingNot Applicable%★★☆☆☆ (2)
Patients who reported that NO, they did not receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge18%N/A
Patients who reported that YES, they did receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge82%N/A

Survey response rate: 19% (704 surveys completed). Data from 04/01/2024 to 03/31/2025 .

Services & Specialties

National Park Medical Center offers the following services based on CMS Provider of Services data:

Emergency & Critical Care

National Park Medical Center offers 4 of 8 possible critical care capabilities, classified as Moderate. Moderate critical care (3–5 unit types) covers many common emergencies but may require transfers for specialized trauma, burns, or pediatric/neonatal intensive care. Consider whether your likely health needs are covered.

🚨 Emergency Department
🏥 Intensive Care Unit (ICU)
🔬 Surgical ICU
❤️ Coronary Care Unit (CCU)

Surgical Services

🏥 Inpatient Surgery
🏢 Outpatient Surgery
❤️ Open-Heart Surgery
🧠 Neurosurgery
💓 Cardiac Catheterization Lab

Specialty Services

🤰 Obstetrics (OB)
👶 Neonatal Nursery
🧒 Pediatric Services
🌬️ Respiratory Care

Service availability is self-reported by the facility. Confirm specific services directly with the hospital. Use our printable question list to prepare for the conversation.

Bed Count, Capacity & Staffing

National Park Medical Center has 163 licensed beds (163 Medicare-certified) with a nurse-to-bed ratio of 0.9:1. Higher ratios generally indicate more nursing staff per patient, which research links to better outcomes in medication errors, patient falls, and response times.

Bed Type Count
Total Licensed Beds163
CMS Certified Beds163
Psychiatric Unit Beds17
Staffing snapshot: 147 affiliated physicians • 149 registered nurses • 10 operating rooms

Doctors Affiliated with National Park Medical Center

147 physicians are affiliated with National Park Medical Center, including 27 surgeons. Doctor affiliations are sourced from CMS Physician Compare data and indicate physicians who have a formal relationship with this hospital.

147
Total Doctors
35
Procedural Specialists
27
Surgeons

Featured Affiliated Physicians

Barry M. Garner
Upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy for acid reflux
NPI: 1306832811
Terri T. Blackstock
Upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy for acid reflux
NPI: 1881696433
Thusha N. Nathan
Upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy for acid reflux
NPI: 1295718211
David E. Connor
Spinal fusion
NPI: 1508077884
Thomas E. Watts, III
Coronary angioplasty and stenting
NPI: 1457619884
John R. Pace
Laminectomy or laminotomy (partial removal of spine bones)
NPI: 1346205622

Showing 147 of 147 affiliated physicians. Doctor affiliations from CMS Physician Compare data.

Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAI)

Healthcare-associated infections are one of the most important safety metrics when evaluating a hospital. These infections are acquired during a hospital stay, not the reason for admission. CMS tracks rates for specific infection types and compares each hospital to the national benchmark.

Infection TypeScore (SIR)vs. National
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit0.027No Different than National Benchmark
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit2.662No Different than National Benchmark
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection: Number of Device Days2375No Different than National Benchmark
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases1.853No Different than National Benchmark
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases1No Different than National Benchmark
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards)0.540No Different than National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit0.437No Different than National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit2.644No Different than National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Number of Urinary Catheter Days5525No Different than National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases4.191No Different than National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases5No Different than National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards)1.193No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Colon Surgery: Lower Confidence Limit0.220No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Colon Surgery: Upper Confidence Limit4.327No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Colon Surgery: Number of Procedures57No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Colon Surgery: Predicted Cases1.527No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Colon Surgery: Observed Cases2No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Colon Surgery1.310No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Lower Confidence LimitNot AvailableNot Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Upper Confidence LimitNot AvailableNot Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Number of Procedures9Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Predicted Cases0.065Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Observed Cases1Not Available
SSI - Abdominal HysterectomyNot AvailableNot Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Lower Confidence LimitN/ANo Different than National Benchmark
MRSA Bacteremia: Upper Confidence Limit2.550No Different than National Benchmark
MRSA Bacteremia: Patient Days21095No Different than National Benchmark
MRSA Bacteremia: Predicted Cases1.175No Different than National Benchmark
MRSA Bacteremia: Observed Cases0No Different than National Benchmark
MRSA Bacteremia0.000No Different than National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Lower Confidence LimitN/ABetter than the National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Upper Confidence Limit0.389Better than the National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Patient Days20685Better than the National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Predicted Cases7.699Better than the National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Observed Cases0Better than the National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff)0.000Better than the National Benchmark

How to read this: "Better than national" means the hospital's infection rate is statistically significantly lower than the national average — a sign of strong infection-control protocols (hand hygiene, sterilization, catheter management). "Worse than national" may warrant asking the hospital about their improvement initiatives.

Infection data reported to the CDC's National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN).

Complications & Deaths

CMS tracks post-surgical complications and mortality rates for common procedures and conditions (heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, hip/knee replacement, and more). These measures reflect how patients actually fare at this hospital compared to the national average.

MeasureScorePatientsvs. National
Rate of complications for hip/knee replacement patients3.687No Different Than the National Rate
Hybrid Hospital-Wide All-Cause Risk Standardized Mortality Rate5.2669Worse Than the National Rate
Death rate for heart attack patients13.479No Different Than the National Rate
Death rate for CABG surgery patients2.963No Different Than the National Rate
Death rate for COPD patients10.155No Different Than the National Rate
Death rate for heart failure patients14.6145No Different Than the National Rate
Death rate for pneumonia patients20.2287Worse Than the National Rate
Death rate for stroke patients15.566No Different Than the National Rate
Pressure ulcer rate0.261,865No Different Than the National Rate
Death rate among surgical inpatients with serious treatable complications176.3749No Different Than the National Rate
Iatrogenic pneumothorax rate0.242,330No Different Than the National Rate
In-hospital fall-associated fracture rate0.282,543No Different Than the National Rate
Postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma rate1.99666No Different Than the National Rate
Postoperative acute kidney injury requiring dialysis rate1.51279No Different Than the National Rate
Postoperative respiratory failure rate17.23279Worse Than the National Rate
Perioperative pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis rate3.09713No Different Than the National Rate
Postoperative sepsis rate5.22265No Different Than the National Rate
Postoperative wound dehiscence rate1.65118No Different Than the National Rate
Abdominopelvic accidental puncture or laceration rate0.94373No Different Than the National Rate
CMS Medicare PSI 90: Patient safety and adverse events composite1.07N/ANo Different Than the National Value

What to consider: A "worse than national" rating on mortality or complications is a serious signal — particularly for elective procedures where you have time to choose a facility. For emergency care, proximity and speed often outweigh these metrics. Ask the hospital about their outcomes for your specific procedure.

Readmissions & Unplanned Hospital Visits

A readmission means a patient returned to the hospital within 30 days of discharge. High readmission rates can signal gaps in discharge planning, patient education, or follow-up care coordination. CMS penalizes hospitals with excess readmissions through the HRRP.

MeasureScorePatientsvs. National
Hospital return days for heart attack patients48.892More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
Hospital return days for heart failure patients-26.2160Fewer Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
Hospital return days for pneumonia patients9.2312Average Days per 100 Discharges
Hybrid Hospital-Wide All-Cause Readmission Measure (HWR)15.81,030No Different Than the National Rate
Rate of unplanned hospital visits after colonoscopy (per 1,000 colonoscopies)15.7384No Different Than the National Rate
Rate of inpatient admissions for patients receiving outpatient chemotherapy10.726No Different Than the National Rate
Rate of emergency department (ED) visits for patients receiving outpatient chemotherapy5.126No Different Than the National Rate
Ratio of unplanned hospital visits after hospital outpatient surgery0.9412No Different than expected
Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) 30-Day Readmission Rate15.292No Different Than the National Rate
Rate of readmission for CABG9.962No Different Than the National Rate
Rate of readmission for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients17.765No Different Than the National Rate
Heart failure (HF) 30-Day Readmission Rate18.1160No Different Than the National Rate
Rate of readmission after hip/knee replacement4.885No Different Than the National Rate
Pneumonia (PN) 30-Day Readmission Rate16.4312No Different Than the National Rate

What to ask: If this hospital has higher-than-average readmission rates, ask about their discharge process — do they provide follow-up appointments, medication reconciliation, and clear care instructions before you leave?

Nearby Hospitals

If National Park Medical Center isn't in your Medicare plan's network — or you want to compare quality ratings before a procedure — these are the closest alternatives within 15 miles:

Levi Hospital

2 miles
Not Rated N/A
Hot Springs, AR · 50 beds

Chi St. Vincent Hospital Hot Springs

2.2 miles
★★★☆☆ 3/5
Hot Springs, AR · 282 beds

View all hospitals near 71901, AR →

Switching hospitals may mean switching plans. Check the Medicare enrollment timeline to make sure you don't miss your window, and use our enrollment checklist to stay organized.

Location & Directions

Address: 1910 Malvern Avenue, Hot Springs, AR 71901
Phone: (501) 321-1000

Get directions on Google Maps →

What to Do with This Information

Hospital quality data is most useful when paired with your specific situation. Here's how to act on it:

  • Check network status: Before choosing this hospital, verify it's in-network for your Medicare Advantage plan. Out-of-network care can cost significantly more.
  • Ask about specific outcomes: If you're considering an elective procedure, ask the hospital for their outcomes data on that specific surgery — not just overall ratings.
  • Compare nearby options: Use the nearby hospitals section above to compare quality scores across facilities in the area.
  • Review your Medicare plan: Your plan's network determines which hospitals you can access affordably. Use our enrollment checklist to stay organized if you're switching plans. Check enrollment deadlines →
  • Talk to your doctor: Ask your primary care physician which hospitals they're affiliated with and whether they're in-network for your plan. Print our doctor questions checklist →
View on Medicare.gov Compare Medicare Plans in 71901, AR →

National Park Medical Center: Common Questions

What does a 1-star rating mean for National Park Medical Center?

CMS rates hospitals on a 1-to-5 star scale based on quality measures across mortality, safety, readmission, patient experience, and timely care. A 1-star rating indicates this hospital is below the national average on some measures. The rating is updated quarterly by CMS.

Does National Park Medical Center have an emergency room?

Yes, National Park Medical Center operates an emergency department.

How many doctors are affiliated with National Park Medical Center?

147 physicians are affiliated with this hospital according to CMS Physician Compare data. This includes 27 surgeons.

Does National Park Medical Center accept Medicare?

Yes. All hospitals listed on Medicare Hospital Compare are Medicare-certified facilities. However, whether this hospital is in-network for your specific Medicare Advantage plan depends on your plan's provider network. Check your plan documents or call your insurer to verify.

How many beds does National Park Medical Center have?

National Park Medical Center has 163 licensed beds. Bed count is an indicator of hospital capacity — larger hospitals often offer more specialized services.

Where does the data on this page come from?

All data is sourced from official CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) databases: Hospital Compare for quality measures and star ratings, Provider of Services for beds and services, and Physician Compare for doctor affiliations. Data is updated quarterly. Read our full methodology →

About the Reviewer

Wes Ward

Wes Ward

Founder & Data Lead

Wes Ward is the founder of InsuranceDataNow.org and reviews all hospital quality data and methodology for accuracy. Every hospital profile — including the CMS quality measures, infection rates, and doctor affiliations on this page — goes through his data-validation pipeline before publication.

With 25+ years in data analytics — including work with highly regulated genomic data at Ancestry.com — Wes brings enterprise-level rigor to healthcare transparency. He is also a co-founder of BestNeighborhood.org, CrimeGrade.org, and ISPReports.org.

View full profile →LinkedIn

Data sources: CMS Hospital Compare (February 2026), Provider of Services (Q4 2025), CMS Physician Compare, CDC NHSN. This page is for informational purposes only. Always verify information directly with the hospital. Read our full methodology →

Medicare Resources

Hospital quality data is just one piece of the Medicare puzzle. Explore our guides to make the best decisions for your coverage:

Does your Medicare plan cover National Park Medical Center?

Compare Plans in 71901, AR →