Hospital Profile

Cedar Park Regional Medical Center

1401 Medical Parkway
Cedar Park, TX 78613
★★★★☆
4/5 CMS Overall Rating
126
Licensed Beds
Acute Care
Hospital Type
236
Affiliated Doctors
None Reported
Critical Care
1.7:1
Nurse-to-Bed Ratio
Data Source: Hospital data from CMS Hospital Compare (February 2026) and Provider of Services file (Q4 2025). Doctor affiliations from CMS Physician Compare. Quality measures are updated quarterly.
Reviewed by: Wes Ward, Founder & Data Lead • View our methodology

Hospital Details

Cedar Park Regional Medical Center is a 4.00-star acute care hospital located in Cedar Park, Texas with 126 licensed beds.

A 4-star CMS rating places Cedar Park Regional Medical Center above the national average for overall quality. 236 physicians are affiliated with this facility, and it provides emergency services. It reports a 1.7:1 nurse-to-bed ratio.

Hospital Type Acute Care Hospitals
Ownership Voluntary non-profit - Other
Teaching Status Non-Teaching Hospital

Quality Ratings & Measures

CMS evaluates hospitals across five quality domains. Here's how Cedar Park Regional Medical Center compares:

4
Overall Rating
of 5 stars
💔
Same as National
Mortality
0 of 6 better
🛡️
Better than National
Safety
1 of 5 better
🔄
Same as National
Readmission
0 of 7 better
😊
All 8 domains reported
Patient Experience
8 measures
💰
0.9600
Medicare Spending Index (MSPB)
Below National Avg (Lower Spending)

Quality data from CMS Hospital Compare. "Better than national" means statistically significantly better than the national average. Spending uses the CMS MSPB measure (Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary) index, where 1.000 is national average and values above/below 1.000 indicate higher/lower spending.

Patient Experience (HCAHPS Survey)

The HCAHPS survey is a standardized, national survey of hospital patients. It measures how patients perceive their care — including communication with doctors and nurses, responsiveness of staff, cleanliness, and discharge information. Higher percentages indicate better performance.

MeasureScoreStar Rating
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Always" clean73%N/A
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Sometimes" or "Never" clean9%N/A
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Usually" clean18%N/A
Cleanliness - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Cleanliness - star ratingNot Applicable%★★★☆☆ (3)
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" communicated well71%N/A
Nurse communication - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well6%N/A
Nurse communication - star ratingNot Applicable%★★☆☆☆ (2)
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" communicated well23%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" communicated well75%N/A
Doctor communication - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well6%N/A
Doctor communication - star ratingNot Applicable%★★☆☆☆ (2)
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" communicated well19%N/A
Patients who reported that staff "Always" explained about medicines before giving it to them54%N/A
Communication about medicines - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Patients who reported that staff "Sometimes" or "Never" explained about medicines before giving it to them27%N/A
Communication about medicines - star ratingNot Applicable%★★☆☆☆ (2)
Patients who reported that staff "Usually" explained about medicines before giving it to them19%N/A
Discharge information - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Patients who reported that NO, they were not given information about what to do during their recovery at home19%N/A
Discharge information - star ratingNot Applicable%★★☆☆☆ (2)
Patients who reported that YES, they were given information about what to do during their recovery at home81%N/A
Patients who reported that NO, they did not discuss whether they would need help after discharge22%N/A
Patients who reported that YES, they did discuss whether they would need help after discharge78%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" explained things in a way they could understand70%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand8%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand22%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" listened carefully to them73%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them7%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" listened carefully to them20%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect83%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect4%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect13%N/A
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 6 or lower on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)12%N/A
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 7 or 8 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)22%N/A
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 9 or 10 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)66%N/A
Overall hospital rating - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Overall hospital rating - star ratingNot Applicable%★★★☆☆ (3)
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" communicated what the medication was for68%N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated what the medication was for14%N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" communicated what the medication was for.18%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" explained things in a way they could understand65%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand6%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand29%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" listened carefully to them68%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them7%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" listened carefully to them25%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect81%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect5%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect14%N/A
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Always" quiet at night55%N/A
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Sometimes" or "Never" quiet at night11%N/A
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Usually" quiet at night34%N/A
Quietness - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Quietness - star ratingNot Applicable%★★★☆☆ (3)
Patients who reported NO, they would probably not or definitely not recommend the hospital10%N/A
Patients who reported YES, they would definitely recommend the hospital61%N/A
Recommend hospital - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Patients who reported YES, they would probably recommend the hospital29%N/A
Recommend hospital - star ratingNot Applicable%★★☆☆☆ (2)
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" discussed possible side effects41%N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" discussed possible side effects40%N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" discussed possible side effects19%N/A
Summary star ratingNot Applicable%★★☆☆☆ (2)
Patients who reported that NO, they did not receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge16%N/A
Patients who reported that YES, they did receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge84%N/A

Survey response rate: 12% (420 surveys completed). Data from 04/01/2024 to 03/31/2025 .

Services & Specialties

Cedar Park Regional Medical Center offers the following services based on CMS Provider of Services data:

Emergency & Critical Care

Cedar Park Regional Medical Center offers 0 of 8 possible critical care capabilities, classified as None Reported. No critical care capabilities are reported for this facility. If emergency access is important to your coverage, explore the nearby hospitals for alternatives.

No emergency/critical care services reported

Surgical Services

No surgical services reported

Specialty Services

🌬️ Respiratory Care

Service availability is self-reported by the facility. Confirm specific services directly with the hospital. Use our printable question list to prepare for the conversation.

Bed Count, Capacity & Staffing

Cedar Park Regional Medical Center has 126 licensed beds (126 Medicare-certified) with a nurse-to-bed ratio of 1.7:1. Higher ratios generally indicate more nursing staff per patient, which research links to better outcomes in medication errors, patient falls, and response times.

Bed Type Count
Total Licensed Beds126
CMS Certified Beds126
Staffing snapshot: 236 affiliated physicians • 216 registered nurses • 6 operating rooms

Doctors Affiliated with Cedar Park Regional Medical Center

236 physicians are affiliated with Cedar Park Regional Medical Center, including 34 surgeons. Doctor affiliations are sourced from CMS Physician Compare data and indicate physicians who have a formal relationship with this hospital.

236
Total Doctors
49
Procedural Specialists
34
Surgeons

Featured Affiliated Physicians

Rafael Amaro
Upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy for acid reflux
NPI: 1942313218
Junaid Siddiqui
Upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy for acid reflux
NPI: 1093750770
Vinit N. Varu
Varicose vein removal
NPI: 1952564056
Chad J. Long
Colonoscopy
NPI: 1801865142
Dustin G. Kiker
Upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy for acid reflux
NPI: 1730362807
Jean C. Mbachu
Upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy for acid reflux
NPI: 1124415252

Showing 236 of 236 affiliated physicians. Doctor affiliations from CMS Physician Compare data.

Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAI)

Healthcare-associated infections are one of the most important safety metrics when evaluating a hospital. These infections are acquired during a hospital stay, not the reason for admission. CMS tracks rates for specific infection types and compares each hospital to the national benchmark.

Infection TypeScore (SIR)vs. National
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence LimitNot AvailableNot Available
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence LimitNot AvailableNot Available
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection: Number of Device Days1476Not Available
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases0.960Not Available
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases0Not Available
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards)Not AvailableNot Available
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence LimitN/ANo Different than National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit2.818No Different than National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Number of Urinary Catheter Days1628No Different than National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases1.063No Different than National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases0No Different than National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards)0.000No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Colon Surgery: Lower Confidence LimitN/ANo Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Colon Surgery: Upper Confidence Limit1.862No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Colon Surgery: Number of Procedures59No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Colon Surgery: Predicted Cases1.609No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Colon Surgery: Observed Cases0No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Colon Surgery0.000No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Lower Confidence LimitNot AvailableNot Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Upper Confidence LimitNot AvailableNot Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Number of Procedures69Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Predicted Cases0.577Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Observed Cases0Not Available
SSI - Abdominal HysterectomyNot AvailableNot Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Lower Confidence LimitNot AvailableNot Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Upper Confidence LimitNot AvailableNot Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Patient Days23208Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Predicted Cases0.953Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Observed Cases1Not Available
MRSA BacteremiaNot AvailableNot Available
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Lower Confidence Limit0.035Better than the National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Upper Confidence Limit0.682Better than the National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Patient Days22582Better than the National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Predicted Cases9.691Better than the National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Observed Cases2Better than the National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff)0.206Better than the National Benchmark

How to read this: "Better than national" means the hospital's infection rate is statistically significantly lower than the national average — a sign of strong infection-control protocols (hand hygiene, sterilization, catheter management). "Worse than national" may warrant asking the hospital about their improvement initiatives.

Infection data reported to the CDC's National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN).

Complications & Deaths

CMS tracks post-surgical complications and mortality rates for common procedures and conditions (heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, hip/knee replacement, and more). These measures reflect how patients actually fare at this hospital compared to the national average.

MeasureScorePatientsvs. National
Rate of complications for hip/knee replacement patients3.541No Different Than the National Rate
Hybrid Hospital-Wide All-Cause Risk Standardized Mortality Rate4.7705No Different Than the National Rate
Death rate for heart attack patients11.1106No Different Than the National Rate
Death rate for CABG surgery patientsN/AN/ANot Available
Death rate for COPD patients8.569No Different Than the National Rate
Death rate for heart failure patients11.2115No Different Than the National Rate
Death rate for pneumonia patients17.2292No Different Than the National Rate
Death rate for stroke patients12.651No Different Than the National Rate
Pressure ulcer rate0.351,718No Different Than the National Rate
Death rate among surgical inpatients with serious treatable complications158.6932No Different Than the National Rate
Iatrogenic pneumothorax rate0.192,363No Different Than the National Rate
In-hospital fall-associated fracture rate0.252,331No Different Than the National Rate
Postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma rate2.14435No Different Than the National Rate
Postoperative acute kidney injury requiring dialysis rate1.63161No Different Than the National Rate
Postoperative respiratory failure rate6.77180No Different Than the National Rate
Perioperative pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis rate2.97456No Different Than the National Rate
Postoperative sepsis rate4.67163No Different Than the National Rate
Postoperative wound dehiscence rate1.73112No Different Than the National Rate
Abdominopelvic accidental puncture or laceration rate0.95437No Different Than the National Rate
CMS Medicare PSI 90: Patient safety and adverse events composite0.79N/ANo Different Than the National Value

What to consider: A "worse than national" rating on mortality or complications is a serious signal — particularly for elective procedures where you have time to choose a facility. For emergency care, proximity and speed often outweigh these metrics. Ask the hospital about their outcomes for your specific procedure.

Readmissions & Unplanned Hospital Visits

A readmission means a patient returned to the hospital within 30 days of discharge. High readmission rates can signal gaps in discharge planning, patient education, or follow-up care coordination. CMS penalizes hospitals with excess readmissions through the HRRP.

MeasureScorePatientsvs. National
Hospital return days for heart attack patients13.394Average Days per 100 Discharges
Hospital return days for heart failure patients6.9122Average Days per 100 Discharges
Hospital return days for pneumonia patients23.6302More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
Hybrid Hospital-Wide All-Cause Readmission Measure (HWR)15.61,020No Different Than the National Rate
Rate of unplanned hospital visits after colonoscopy (per 1,000 colonoscopies)15.6286No Different Than the National Rate
Rate of inpatient admissions for patients receiving outpatient chemotherapyN/A0Number of Cases Too Small
Rate of emergency department (ED) visits for patients receiving outpatient chemotherapyN/A0Number of Cases Too Small
Ratio of unplanned hospital visits after hospital outpatient surgery1.2161No Different than expected
Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) 30-Day Readmission Rate14.994No Different Than the National Rate
Rate of readmission for CABGN/A0Not Available
Rate of readmission for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients18.477No Different Than the National Rate
Heart failure (HF) 30-Day Readmission Rate20.9122No Different Than the National Rate
Rate of readmission after hip/knee replacement4.950No Different Than the National Rate
Pneumonia (PN) 30-Day Readmission Rate17.4302No Different Than the National Rate

What to ask: If this hospital has higher-than-average readmission rates, ask about their discharge process — do they provide follow-up appointments, medication reconciliation, and clear care instructions before you leave?

Nearby Hospitals

If Cedar Park Regional Medical Center isn't in your Medicare plan's network — or you want to compare quality ratings before a procedure — these are the closest alternatives within 15 miles:

Round Rock Medical Center

6 miles
★★★☆☆ 3/5
Round Rock, TX · 209 beds

Baylor Scott & White Medical Center - Round Rock

7.8 miles
★★★★☆ 4/5
Round Rock, TX · 278 beds

Brushy Creek Family Hospital Llc

8.1 miles
Not Rated N/A
Round Rock, TX · 7 beds

Georgetown Behavioral Health Institute

9.6 miles
Not Rated N/A
Georgetown, TX · 118 beds

Ascension Seton Northwest

9.7 miles
★★★★☆ 4/5
Austin, TX · 124 beds

Rock Springs

9.7 miles
Not Rated N/A
Georgetown, TX · 96 beds

Ascension Seton Williamson

9.8 miles
★★★★☆ 4/5
Round Rock, TX · 181 beds

North Austin Medical Center

10.4 miles
★★★☆☆ 3/5
Austin, TX · 511 beds

Northwest Hills Surgical Hospital

13.1 miles
Not Rated N/A
Austin, TX · 8 beds

Baylor Scott & White Medical Center Pflugerville

14.3 miles
★★★★☆ 4/5
Pflugerville, TX · 46 beds

View all hospitals near 78613, TX →

Switching hospitals may mean switching plans. Check the Medicare enrollment timeline to make sure you don't miss your window, and use our enrollment checklist to stay organized.

Location & Directions

Address: 1401 Medical Parkway, Cedar Park, TX 78613
Phone: (512) 528-7000

Get directions on Google Maps →

What to Do with This Information

Hospital quality data is most useful when paired with your specific situation. Here's how to act on it:

  • Check network status: Before choosing this hospital, verify it's in-network for your Medicare Advantage plan. Out-of-network care can cost significantly more.
  • Ask about specific outcomes: If you're considering an elective procedure, ask the hospital for their outcomes data on that specific surgery — not just overall ratings.
  • Compare nearby options: Use the nearby hospitals section above to compare quality scores across facilities in the area.
  • Review your Medicare plan: Your plan's network determines which hospitals you can access affordably. Use our enrollment checklist to stay organized if you're switching plans. Check enrollment deadlines →
  • Talk to your doctor: Ask your primary care physician which hospitals they're affiliated with and whether they're in-network for your plan. Print our doctor questions checklist →
View on Medicare.gov Compare Medicare Plans in 78613, TX →

Cedar Park Regional Medical Center: Common Questions

What does a 4-star rating mean for Cedar Park Regional Medical Center?

CMS rates hospitals on a 1-to-5 star scale based on quality measures across mortality, safety, readmission, patient experience, and timely care. A 4-star rating places this hospital above the national average. The rating is updated quarterly by CMS.

Does Cedar Park Regional Medical Center have an emergency room?

Yes, Cedar Park Regional Medical Center operates an emergency department.

How many doctors are affiliated with Cedar Park Regional Medical Center?

236 physicians are affiliated with this hospital according to CMS Physician Compare data. This includes 34 surgeons.

Does Cedar Park Regional Medical Center accept Medicare?

Yes. All hospitals listed on Medicare Hospital Compare are Medicare-certified facilities. However, whether this hospital is in-network for your specific Medicare Advantage plan depends on your plan's provider network. Check your plan documents or call your insurer to verify.

How many beds does Cedar Park Regional Medical Center have?

Cedar Park Regional Medical Center has 126 licensed beds. Bed count is an indicator of hospital capacity — larger hospitals often offer more specialized services.

Where does the data on this page come from?

All data is sourced from official CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) databases: Hospital Compare for quality measures and star ratings, Provider of Services for beds and services, and Physician Compare for doctor affiliations. Data is updated quarterly. Read our full methodology →

About the Reviewer

Wes Ward

Wes Ward

Founder & Data Lead

Wes Ward is the founder of InsuranceDataNow.org and reviews all hospital quality data and methodology for accuracy. Every hospital profile — including the CMS quality measures, infection rates, and doctor affiliations on this page — goes through his data-validation pipeline before publication.

With 25+ years in data analytics — including work with highly regulated genomic data at Ancestry.com — Wes brings enterprise-level rigor to healthcare transparency. He is also a co-founder of BestNeighborhood.org, CrimeGrade.org, and ISPReports.org.

View full profile →LinkedIn

Data sources: CMS Hospital Compare (February 2026), Provider of Services (Q4 2025), CMS Physician Compare, CDC NHSN. This page is for informational purposes only. Always verify information directly with the hospital. Read our full methodology →

Medicare Resources

Hospital quality data is just one piece of the Medicare puzzle. Explore our guides to make the best decisions for your coverage:

Does your Medicare plan cover Cedar Park Regional Medical Center?

Compare Plans in 78613, TX →