Hospital Profile

San Juan Regional Medical Center Inc

801 West Maple Street
Farmington, NM 87401
★★☆☆☆
2/5 CMS Overall Rating
240
Licensed Beds
Acute Care
Hospital Type
341
Affiliated Doctors
Moderate
Critical Care
1.0:1
Nurse-to-Bed Ratio
Data Source: Hospital data from CMS Hospital Compare (February 2026) and Provider of Services file (Q4 2025). Doctor affiliations from CMS Physician Compare. Quality measures are updated quarterly.
Reviewed by: Wes Ward, Founder & Data Lead • View our methodology

Hospital Details

San Juan Regional Medical Center Inc is a 2.00-star acute care hospital located in Farmington, New Mexico with 240 licensed beds. As a private non-profit, its revenue is reinvested into patient care and community programs. It maintains a limited teaching affiliation with a medical school.

Its 2-star CMS rating is below the national average, which may indicate opportunities for improvement across quality domains. 341 physicians are affiliated with this facility, and it provides emergency services. Its critical care footprint covers 4 of 8 unit types (Moderate) with a 1.0:1 nurse-to-bed ratio.

Hospital Type Acute Care Hospitals
Ownership Voluntary non-profit - Private
Teaching Status Limited Teaching Hospital

Quality Ratings & Measures

CMS evaluates hospitals across five quality domains. Here's how San Juan Regional Medical Center Inc compares:

2
Overall Rating
of 5 stars
💔
Same as National
Mortality
0 of 6 better
🛡️
Better than National
Safety
1 of 7 better
🔄
Same as National
Readmission
0 of 10 better
😊
All 8 domains reported
Patient Experience
8 measures
💰
0.9800
Medicare Spending Index (MSPB)
Near National Avg

Quality data from CMS Hospital Compare. "Better than national" means statistically significantly better than the national average. Spending uses the CMS MSPB measure (Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary) index, where 1.000 is national average and values above/below 1.000 indicate higher/lower spending.

Patient Experience (HCAHPS Survey)

The HCAHPS survey is a standardized, national survey of hospital patients. It measures how patients perceive their care — including communication with doctors and nurses, responsiveness of staff, cleanliness, and discharge information. Higher percentages indicate better performance.

MeasureScoreStar Rating
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Always" clean68%N/A
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Sometimes" or "Never" clean13%N/A
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Usually" clean19%N/A
Cleanliness - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Cleanliness - star ratingNot Applicable%★★★☆☆ (3)
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" communicated well70%N/A
Nurse communication - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well8%N/A
Nurse communication - star ratingNot Applicable%★★☆☆☆ (2)
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" communicated well22%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" communicated well72%N/A
Doctor communication - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well7%N/A
Doctor communication - star ratingNot Applicable%★★☆☆☆ (2)
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" communicated well21%N/A
Patients who reported that staff "Always" explained about medicines before giving it to them59%N/A
Communication about medicines - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Patients who reported that staff "Sometimes" or "Never" explained about medicines before giving it to them23%N/A
Communication about medicines - star ratingNot Applicable%★★☆☆☆ (2)
Patients who reported that staff "Usually" explained about medicines before giving it to them18%N/A
Discharge information - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Patients who reported that NO, they were not given information about what to do during their recovery at home17%N/A
Discharge information - star ratingNot Applicable%★★☆☆☆ (2)
Patients who reported that YES, they were given information about what to do during their recovery at home83%N/A
Patients who reported that NO, they did not discuss whether they would need help after discharge18%N/A
Patients who reported that YES, they did discuss whether they would need help after discharge82%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" explained things in a way they could understand67%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand8%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand25%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" listened carefully to them70%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them7%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" listened carefully to them23%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect79%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect6%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect15%N/A
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 6 or lower on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)12%N/A
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 7 or 8 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)26%N/A
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 9 or 10 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)62%N/A
Overall hospital rating - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Overall hospital rating - star ratingNot Applicable%★★★☆☆ (3)
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" communicated what the medication was for70%N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated what the medication was for14%N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" communicated what the medication was for.16%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" explained things in a way they could understand65%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand10%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand25%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" listened carefully to them69%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them9%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" listened carefully to them22%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect78%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect6%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect16%N/A
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Always" quiet at night61%N/A
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Sometimes" or "Never" quiet at night11%N/A
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Usually" quiet at night28%N/A
Quietness - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Quietness - star ratingNot Applicable%★★★☆☆ (3)
Patients who reported NO, they would probably not or definitely not recommend the hospital8%N/A
Patients who reported YES, they would definitely recommend the hospital54%N/A
Recommend hospital - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Patients who reported YES, they would probably recommend the hospital38%N/A
Recommend hospital - star ratingNot Applicable%★★☆☆☆ (2)
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" discussed possible side effects48%N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" discussed possible side effects33%N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" discussed possible side effects19%N/A
Summary star ratingNot Applicable%★★☆☆☆ (2)
Patients who reported that NO, they did not receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge16%N/A
Patients who reported that YES, they did receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge84%N/A

Survey response rate: 13% (362 surveys completed). Data from 04/01/2024 to 03/31/2025 .

Services & Specialties

San Juan Regional Medical Center Inc offers the following services based on CMS Provider of Services data:

Emergency & Critical Care

San Juan Regional Medical Center Inc offers 4 of 8 possible critical care capabilities, classified as Moderate. Moderate critical care (3–5 unit types) covers many common emergencies but may require transfers for specialized trauma, burns, or pediatric/neonatal intensive care. Consider whether your likely health needs are covered.

🚨 Emergency Department
🏥 Intensive Care Unit (ICU)
❤️ Coronary Care Unit (CCU)
🆘 Shock-Trauma

Surgical Services

🏥 Inpatient Surgery
🏢 Outpatient Surgery
🧠 Neurosurgery
💓 Cardiac Catheterization Lab

Specialty Services

🤰 Obstetrics (OB)
👶 Neonatal Nursery
🧒 Pediatric Services
🧠 Psychiatric Services
🌬️ Respiratory Care

Service availability is self-reported by the facility. Confirm specific services directly with the hospital. Use our printable question list to prepare for the conversation.

Bed Count, Capacity & Staffing

San Juan Regional Medical Center Inc has 240 licensed beds (240 Medicare-certified) with a nurse-to-bed ratio of 1.0:1. Higher ratios generally indicate more nursing staff per patient, which research links to better outcomes in medication errors, patient falls, and response times.

Bed Type Count
Total Licensed Beds240
CMS Certified Beds240
Staffing snapshot: 341 affiliated physicians • 251 registered nurses • 10 operating rooms

Doctors Affiliated with San Juan Regional Medical Center Inc

341 physicians are affiliated with San Juan Regional Medical Center Inc, including 63 surgeons. Doctor affiliations are sourced from CMS Physician Compare data and indicate physicians who have a formal relationship with this hospital.

341
Total Doctors
83
Procedural Specialists
63
Surgeons

Featured Affiliated Physicians

Scott D. Allen
Cataract surgery
NPI: 1275590754
Chris T. Buntrock
Cataract surgery
NPI: 1073531851
Allison C. Stradiotto
Cataract surgery
NPI: 1811456809
Jason Glass
Upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy for acid reflux
NPI: 1336534528
Faraz Sandhu
Leg revascularization (restoring blood flow)
NPI: 1245385947
Jason A. Slate
Upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy for acid reflux
NPI: 1275648586

Showing 341 of 341 affiliated physicians. Doctor affiliations from CMS Physician Compare data.

Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAI)

Healthcare-associated infections are one of the most important safety metrics when evaluating a hospital. These infections are acquired during a hospital stay, not the reason for admission. CMS tracks rates for specific infection types and compares each hospital to the national benchmark.

Infection TypeScore (SIR)vs. National
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit0.422No Different than National Benchmark
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit3.207No Different than National Benchmark
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection: Number of Device Days4381No Different than National Benchmark
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases3.009No Different than National Benchmark
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases4No Different than National Benchmark
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards)1.329No Different than National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit0.223No Different than National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit2.389No Different than National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Number of Urinary Catheter Days4880No Different than National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases3.418No Different than National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases3No Different than National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards)0.878No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Colon Surgery: Lower Confidence Limit0.716No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Colon Surgery: Upper Confidence Limit4.334No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Colon Surgery: Number of Procedures91No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Colon Surgery: Predicted Cases2.557No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Colon Surgery: Observed Cases5No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Colon Surgery1.955No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Lower Confidence LimitNot AvailableNot Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Upper Confidence LimitNot AvailableNot Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Number of Procedures3Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Predicted Cases0.054Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Observed Cases0Not Available
SSI - Abdominal HysterectomyNot AvailableNot Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Lower Confidence Limit0.032No Different than National Benchmark
MRSA Bacteremia: Upper Confidence Limit3.106No Different than National Benchmark
MRSA Bacteremia: Patient Days37888No Different than National Benchmark
MRSA Bacteremia: Predicted Cases1.588No Different than National Benchmark
MRSA Bacteremia: Observed Cases1No Different than National Benchmark
MRSA Bacteremia0.630No Different than National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Lower Confidence Limit0.105Better than the National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Upper Confidence Limit0.538Better than the National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Patient Days36458Better than the National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Predicted Cases23.198Better than the National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Observed Cases6Better than the National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff)0.259Better than the National Benchmark

How to read this: "Better than national" means the hospital's infection rate is statistically significantly lower than the national average — a sign of strong infection-control protocols (hand hygiene, sterilization, catheter management). "Worse than national" may warrant asking the hospital about their improvement initiatives.

Infection data reported to the CDC's National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN).

Complications & Deaths

CMS tracks post-surgical complications and mortality rates for common procedures and conditions (heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, hip/knee replacement, and more). These measures reflect how patients actually fare at this hospital compared to the national average.

MeasureScorePatientsvs. National
Rate of complications for hip/knee replacement patientsN/AN/ANumber of Cases Too Small
Hybrid Hospital-Wide All-Cause Risk Standardized Mortality Rate4.1997No Different Than the National Rate
Death rate for heart attack patients12.3144No Different Than the National Rate
Death rate for CABG surgery patientsN/AN/ANot Available
Death rate for COPD patients12.5132No Different Than the National Rate
Death rate for heart failure patients12.9255No Different Than the National Rate
Death rate for pneumonia patients16.6407No Different Than the National Rate
Death rate for stroke patients15.8122No Different Than the National Rate
Pressure ulcer rate0.203,453No Different Than the National Rate
Death rate among surgical inpatients with serious treatable complications174.0642No Different Than the National Rate
Iatrogenic pneumothorax rate0.234,425No Different Than the National Rate
In-hospital fall-associated fracture rate0.274,375No Different Than the National Rate
Postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma rate2.76906No Different Than the National Rate
Postoperative acute kidney injury requiring dialysis rateN/AN/ANot Available
Postoperative respiratory failure rateN/AN/ANot Available
Perioperative pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis rate2.79910No Different Than the National Rate
Postoperative sepsis rateN/AN/ANot Available
Postoperative wound dehiscence rate2.65184No Different Than the National Rate
Abdominopelvic accidental puncture or laceration rate0.89688No Different Than the National Rate
CMS Medicare PSI 90: Patient safety and adverse events composite0.86N/ANo Different Than the National Value

What to consider: A "worse than national" rating on mortality or complications is a serious signal — particularly for elective procedures where you have time to choose a facility. For emergency care, proximity and speed often outweigh these metrics. Ask the hospital about their outcomes for your specific procedure.

Readmissions & Unplanned Hospital Visits

A readmission means a patient returned to the hospital within 30 days of discharge. High readmission rates can signal gaps in discharge planning, patient education, or follow-up care coordination. CMS penalizes hospitals with excess readmissions through the HRRP.

MeasureScorePatientsvs. National
Hospital return days for heart attack patients-4139Average Days per 100 Discharges
Hospital return days for heart failure patients4.7273Average Days per 100 Discharges
Hospital return days for pneumonia patients-15.9417Fewer Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
Hybrid Hospital-Wide All-Cause Readmission Measure (HWR)15.21,565No Different Than the National Rate
Rate of unplanned hospital visits after colonoscopy (per 1,000 colonoscopies)131,085No Different Than the National Rate
Rate of inpatient admissions for patients receiving outpatient chemotherapy10.532No Different Than the National Rate
Rate of emergency department (ED) visits for patients receiving outpatient chemotherapy4.932No Different Than the National Rate
Ratio of unplanned hospital visits after hospital outpatient surgery1363No Different than expected
Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) 30-Day Readmission Rate12.7139No Different Than the National Rate
Rate of readmission for CABGN/A0Not Available
Rate of readmission for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients19.7143No Different Than the National Rate
Heart failure (HF) 30-Day Readmission Rate18.6273No Different Than the National Rate
Rate of readmission after hip/knee replacementN/A0Number of Cases Too Small
Pneumonia (PN) 30-Day Readmission Rate14.6417No Different Than the National Rate

What to ask: If this hospital has higher-than-average readmission rates, ask about their discharge process — do they provide follow-up appointments, medication reconciliation, and clear care instructions before you leave?

Nearby Hospitals

If San Juan Regional Medical Center Inc isn't in your Medicare plan's network — or you want to compare quality ratings before a procedure — these are the closest alternatives within 50 miles:

Hospital Centro Comprensivo Del Cancer

21.2 miles
Not Rated N/A
San Juan, PR · 96 beds

Northern Navajo Medical Center

26.3 miles
Not Rated N/A
Shiprock, NM · 69 beds

Mercy Regional Medical Center

41.4 miles
★★★★★ 5/5
Durango, CO · 82 beds

Animas Surgical Hospital, Llc

42.6 miles
Not Rated N/A
Durango, CO · 12 beds

Southwest Memorial Hospital

48.3 miles
Not Rated N/A
Cortez, CO · 20 beds

View all hospitals near 87401, NM →

Switching hospitals may mean switching plans. Check the Medicare enrollment timeline to make sure you don't miss your window, and use our enrollment checklist to stay organized.

Location & Directions

Address: 801 West Maple Street, Farmington, NM 87401
Phone: (505) 609-2000

Get directions on Google Maps →

What to Do with This Information

Hospital quality data is most useful when paired with your specific situation. Here's how to act on it:

  • Check network status: Before choosing this hospital, verify it's in-network for your Medicare Advantage plan. Out-of-network care can cost significantly more.
  • Ask about specific outcomes: If you're considering an elective procedure, ask the hospital for their outcomes data on that specific surgery — not just overall ratings.
  • Compare nearby options: Use the nearby hospitals section above to compare quality scores across facilities in the area.
  • Review your Medicare plan: Your plan's network determines which hospitals you can access affordably. Use our enrollment checklist to stay organized if you're switching plans. Check enrollment deadlines →
  • Talk to your doctor: Ask your primary care physician which hospitals they're affiliated with and whether they're in-network for your plan. Print our doctor questions checklist →
View on Medicare.gov Compare Medicare Plans in 87401, NM →

San Juan Regional Medical Center Inc: Common Questions

What does a 2-star rating mean for San Juan Regional Medical Center Inc?

CMS rates hospitals on a 1-to-5 star scale based on quality measures across mortality, safety, readmission, patient experience, and timely care. A 2-star rating indicates this hospital is below the national average on some measures. The rating is updated quarterly by CMS.

Does San Juan Regional Medical Center Inc have an emergency room?

Yes, San Juan Regional Medical Center Inc operates an emergency department.

How many doctors are affiliated with San Juan Regional Medical Center Inc?

341 physicians are affiliated with this hospital according to CMS Physician Compare data. This includes 63 surgeons.

Does San Juan Regional Medical Center Inc accept Medicare?

Yes. All hospitals listed on Medicare Hospital Compare are Medicare-certified facilities. However, whether this hospital is in-network for your specific Medicare Advantage plan depends on your plan's provider network. Check your plan documents or call your insurer to verify.

How many beds does San Juan Regional Medical Center Inc have?

San Juan Regional Medical Center Inc has 240 licensed beds. Bed count is an indicator of hospital capacity — larger hospitals often offer more specialized services.

Where does the data on this page come from?

All data is sourced from official CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) databases: Hospital Compare for quality measures and star ratings, Provider of Services for beds and services, and Physician Compare for doctor affiliations. Data is updated quarterly. Read our full methodology →

About the Reviewer

Wes Ward

Wes Ward

Founder & Data Lead

Wes Ward is the founder of InsuranceDataNow.org and reviews all hospital quality data and methodology for accuracy. Every hospital profile — including the CMS quality measures, infection rates, and doctor affiliations on this page — goes through his data-validation pipeline before publication.

With 25+ years in data analytics — including work with highly regulated genomic data at Ancestry.com — Wes brings enterprise-level rigor to healthcare transparency. He is also a co-founder of BestNeighborhood.org, CrimeGrade.org, and ISPReports.org.

View full profile →LinkedIn

Data sources: CMS Hospital Compare (February 2026), Provider of Services (Q4 2025), CMS Physician Compare, CDC NHSN. This page is for informational purposes only. Always verify information directly with the hospital. Read our full methodology →

Medicare Resources

Hospital quality data is just one piece of the Medicare puzzle. Explore our guides to make the best decisions for your coverage:

Does your Medicare plan cover San Juan Regional Medical Center Inc?

Compare Plans in 87401, NM →