Hospital Profile

Deaconess Medical Center

W 800 Fifth Avenue
Spokane, WA 99210
★★★☆☆
3/5 CMS Overall Rating
388
Licensed Beds
Acute Care
Hospital Type
589
Affiliated Doctors
Moderate
Critical Care
1.1:1
Nurse-to-Bed Ratio
Data Source: Hospital data from CMS Hospital Compare (February 2026) and Provider of Services file (Q4 2025). Doctor affiliations from CMS Physician Compare. Quality measures are updated quarterly.
Reviewed by: Wes Ward, Founder & Data Lead • View our methodology

Hospital Details

Deaconess Medical Center is a 3.00-star acute care hospital located in Spokane, Washington with 388 licensed beds. As a private non-profit, its revenue is reinvested into patient care and community programs. As a major teaching hospital, it is affiliated with a medical school and typically offers the most advanced procedures and clinical trials.

Its 3-star CMS rating is at the national average — it meets baseline quality standards across key domains. 589 physicians are affiliated with this facility, and it provides emergency services. Its critical care footprint covers 4 of 8 unit types (Moderate) with a 1.1:1 nurse-to-bed ratio.

Hospital Type Acute Care Hospitals
Ownership Voluntary non-profit - Private
Teaching Status Major Teaching Hospital

Quality Ratings & Measures

CMS evaluates hospitals across five quality domains. Here's how Deaconess Medical Center compares:

3
Overall Rating
of 5 stars
💔
Same as National
Mortality
0 of 7 better
🛡️
Better than National
Safety
3 of 7 better
🔄
Better than National
Readmission
1 of 11 better
😊
All 8 domains reported
Patient Experience
8 measures
💰
0.9700
Medicare Spending Index (MSPB)
Near National Avg

Quality data from CMS Hospital Compare. "Better than national" means statistically significantly better than the national average. Spending uses the CMS MSPB measure (Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary) index, where 1.000 is national average and values above/below 1.000 indicate higher/lower spending.

Patient Experience (HCAHPS Survey)

The HCAHPS survey is a standardized, national survey of hospital patients. It measures how patients perceive their care — including communication with doctors and nurses, responsiveness of staff, cleanliness, and discharge information. Higher percentages indicate better performance.

MeasureScoreStar Rating
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Always" clean62%N/A
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Sometimes" or "Never" clean15%N/A
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Usually" clean23%N/A
Cleanliness - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Cleanliness - star ratingNot Applicable%★★☆☆☆ (2)
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" communicated well74%N/A
Nurse communication - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well5%N/A
Nurse communication - star ratingNot Applicable%★★★☆☆ (3)
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" communicated well21%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" communicated well79%N/A
Doctor communication - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well4%N/A
Doctor communication - star ratingNot Applicable%★★★☆☆ (3)
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" communicated well17%N/A
Patients who reported that staff "Always" explained about medicines before giving it to them55%N/A
Communication about medicines - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Patients who reported that staff "Sometimes" or "Never" explained about medicines before giving it to them23%N/A
Communication about medicines - star ratingNot Applicable%★★☆☆☆ (2)
Patients who reported that staff "Usually" explained about medicines before giving it to them22%N/A
Discharge information - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Patients who reported that NO, they were not given information about what to do during their recovery at home12%N/A
Discharge information - star ratingNot Applicable%★★★★☆ (4)
Patients who reported that YES, they were given information about what to do during their recovery at home88%N/A
Patients who reported that NO, they did not discuss whether they would need help after discharge13%N/A
Patients who reported that YES, they did discuss whether they would need help after discharge87%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" explained things in a way they could understand72%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand6%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand22%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" listened carefully to them78%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them5%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" listened carefully to them17%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect86%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect3%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect11%N/A
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 6 or lower on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)10%N/A
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 7 or 8 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)24%N/A
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 9 or 10 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)66%N/A
Overall hospital rating - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Overall hospital rating - star ratingNot Applicable%★★★☆☆ (3)
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" communicated what the medication was for69%N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated what the medication was for12%N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" communicated what the medication was for.19%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" explained things in a way they could understand69%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand6%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand25%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" listened carefully to them72%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them5%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" listened carefully to them23%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect82%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect3%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect15%N/A
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Always" quiet at night49%N/A
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Sometimes" or "Never" quiet at night14%N/A
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Usually" quiet at night37%N/A
Quietness - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Quietness - star ratingNot Applicable%★★☆☆☆ (2)
Patients who reported NO, they would probably not or definitely not recommend the hospital6%N/A
Patients who reported YES, they would definitely recommend the hospital68%N/A
Recommend hospital - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Patients who reported YES, they would probably recommend the hospital26%N/A
Recommend hospital - star ratingNot Applicable%★★★★☆ (4)
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" discussed possible side effects41%N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" discussed possible side effects34%N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" discussed possible side effects25%N/A
Summary star ratingNot Applicable%★★★☆☆ (3)
Patients who reported that NO, they did not receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge12%N/A
Patients who reported that YES, they did receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge88%N/A

Survey response rate: 23% (1818 surveys completed). Data from 04/01/2024 to 03/31/2025 .

Services & Specialties

Deaconess Medical Center offers the following services based on CMS Provider of Services data:

Emergency & Critical Care

Deaconess Medical Center offers 4 of 8 possible critical care capabilities, classified as Moderate. Moderate critical care (3–5 unit types) covers many common emergencies but may require transfers for specialized trauma, burns, or pediatric/neonatal intensive care. Consider whether your likely health needs are covered.

🚨 Emergency Department
🏥 Intensive Care Unit (ICU)
❤️ Coronary Care Unit (CCU)
🆘 Shock-Trauma

Surgical Services

🏥 Inpatient Surgery
🏢 Outpatient Surgery
❤️ Open-Heart Surgery

Specialty Services

🤰 Obstetrics (OB)
👶 Neonatal Nursery
🧒 Pediatric Services
🩺 Substance Abuse Treatment
🌬️ Respiratory Care

Service availability is self-reported by the facility. Confirm specific services directly with the hospital. Use our printable question list to prepare for the conversation.

Bed Count, Capacity & Staffing

Deaconess Medical Center has 388 licensed beds (388 Medicare-certified) with a nurse-to-bed ratio of 1.1:1. Higher ratios generally indicate more nursing staff per patient, which research links to better outcomes in medication errors, patient falls, and response times.

Bed Type Count
Total Licensed Beds388
CMS Certified Beds388
Psychiatric Unit Beds38
Staffing snapshot: 589 affiliated physicians • 418 registered nurses

Doctors Affiliated with Deaconess Medical Center

589 physicians are affiliated with Deaconess Medical Center, including 82 surgeons. Doctor affiliations are sourced from CMS Physician Compare data and indicate physicians who have a formal relationship with this hospital.

589
Total Doctors
105
Procedural Specialists
82
Surgeons

Featured Affiliated Physicians

Nicolas Villa Guillen
Upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy for acid reflux
NPI: 1265696553
Robert Lawson
Upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy for acid reflux
NPI: 1629158480
Miguel E. Ordonez Castellanos
Upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy for acid reflux
NPI: 1013168392
Ajay Pabby
Upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy for acid reflux
NPI: 1205929163
Robert K. Durnford, III
Upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy for acid reflux
NPI: 1922095827
Scott J. Mcshane
Upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy for acid reflux
NPI: 1629330394

Showing 589 of 589 affiliated physicians. Doctor affiliations from CMS Physician Compare data.

Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAI)

Healthcare-associated infections are one of the most important safety metrics when evaluating a hospital. These infections are acquired during a hospital stay, not the reason for admission. CMS tracks rates for specific infection types and compares each hospital to the national benchmark.

Infection TypeScore (SIR)vs. National
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit0.353No Different than National Benchmark
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit1.442No Different than National Benchmark
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection: Number of Device Days10256No Different than National Benchmark
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases10.537No Different than National Benchmark
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases8No Different than National Benchmark
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards)0.759No Different than National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit0.031Better than the National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit0.619Better than the National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Number of Urinary Catheter Days8705Better than the National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases10.669Better than the National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases2Better than the National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards)0.187Better than the National Benchmark
SSI - Colon Surgery: Lower Confidence Limit0.011No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Colon Surgery: Upper Confidence Limit1.055No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Colon Surgery: Number of Procedures177No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Colon Surgery: Predicted Cases4.674No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Colon Surgery: Observed Cases1No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Colon Surgery0.214No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Lower Confidence LimitNot AvailableNot Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Upper Confidence LimitNot AvailableNot Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Number of Procedures27Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Predicted Cases0.238Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Observed Cases0Not Available
SSI - Abdominal HysterectomyNot AvailableNot Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Lower Confidence Limit0.090No Different than National Benchmark
MRSA Bacteremia: Upper Confidence Limit1.764No Different than National Benchmark
MRSA Bacteremia: Patient Days55902No Different than National Benchmark
MRSA Bacteremia: Predicted Cases3.746No Different than National Benchmark
MRSA Bacteremia: Observed Cases2No Different than National Benchmark
MRSA Bacteremia0.534No Different than National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Lower Confidence Limit0.224Better than the National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Upper Confidence Limit0.644Better than the National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Patient Days47862Better than the National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Predicted Cases35.636Better than the National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Observed Cases14Better than the National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff)0.393Better than the National Benchmark

How to read this: "Better than national" means the hospital's infection rate is statistically significantly lower than the national average — a sign of strong infection-control protocols (hand hygiene, sterilization, catheter management). "Worse than national" may warrant asking the hospital about their improvement initiatives.

Infection data reported to the CDC's National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN).

Complications & Deaths

CMS tracks post-surgical complications and mortality rates for common procedures and conditions (heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, hip/knee replacement, and more). These measures reflect how patients actually fare at this hospital compared to the national average.

MeasureScorePatientsvs. National
Rate of complications for hip/knee replacement patients3.552No Different Than the National Rate
Hybrid Hospital-Wide All-Cause Risk Standardized Mortality Rate3.91,402No Different Than the National Rate
Death rate for heart attack patients13.9187No Different Than the National Rate
Death rate for CABG surgery patients2.363No Different Than the National Rate
Death rate for COPD patients8.650No Different Than the National Rate
Death rate for heart failure patients13.9326No Different Than the National Rate
Death rate for pneumonia patients17.4317No Different Than the National Rate
Death rate for stroke patients14.1136No Different Than the National Rate
Pressure ulcer rate0.623,776No Different Than the National Rate
Death rate among surgical inpatients with serious treatable complications187.94102No Different Than the National Rate
Iatrogenic pneumothorax rate0.155,088No Different Than the National Rate
In-hospital fall-associated fracture rate0.265,290No Different Than the National Rate
Postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma rate3.901,931Worse Than the National Rate
Postoperative acute kidney injury requiring dialysis rate1.811,073No Different Than the National Rate
Postoperative respiratory failure rate18.781,110Worse Than the National Rate
Perioperative pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis rate5.732,023Worse Than the National Rate
Postoperative sepsis rate9.171,099Worse Than the National Rate
Postoperative wound dehiscence rate2.14506No Different Than the National Rate
Abdominopelvic accidental puncture or laceration rate2.181,341Worse Than the National Rate
CMS Medicare PSI 90: Patient safety and adverse events composite1.53N/AWorse Than the National Value

What to consider: A "worse than national" rating on mortality or complications is a serious signal — particularly for elective procedures where you have time to choose a facility. For emergency care, proximity and speed often outweigh these metrics. Ask the hospital about their outcomes for your specific procedure.

Readmissions & Unplanned Hospital Visits

A readmission means a patient returned to the hospital within 30 days of discharge. High readmission rates can signal gaps in discharge planning, patient education, or follow-up care coordination. CMS penalizes hospitals with excess readmissions through the HRRP.

MeasureScorePatientsvs. National
Hospital return days for heart attack patients4.2245Average Days per 100 Discharges
Hospital return days for heart failure patients-13.4339Fewer Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
Hospital return days for pneumonia patients-16.8317Fewer Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
Hybrid Hospital-Wide All-Cause Readmission Measure (HWR)13.22,080Better Than the National Rate
Rate of unplanned hospital visits after colonoscopy (per 1,000 colonoscopies)13.21,733No Different Than the National Rate
Rate of inpatient admissions for patients receiving outpatient chemotherapy9.1279No Different Than the National Rate
Rate of emergency department (ED) visits for patients receiving outpatient chemotherapy5.6279No Different Than the National Rate
Ratio of unplanned hospital visits after hospital outpatient surgery1.2655No Different than expected
Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) 30-Day Readmission Rate14.2245No Different Than the National Rate
Rate of readmission for CABG9.662No Different Than the National Rate
Rate of readmission for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients18.351No Different Than the National Rate
Heart failure (HF) 30-Day Readmission Rate17.8339No Different Than the National Rate
Rate of readmission after hip/knee replacement4.254No Different Than the National Rate
Pneumonia (PN) 30-Day Readmission Rate14.3317No Different Than the National Rate

What to ask: If this hospital has higher-than-average readmission rates, ask about their discharge process — do they provide follow-up appointments, medication reconciliation, and clear care instructions before you leave?

Nearby Hospitals

If Deaconess Medical Center isn't in your Medicare plan's network — or you want to compare quality ratings before a procedure — these are the closest alternatives within 15 miles:

Shriners Hospital For Children

0.4 miles
Not Rated N/A
Spokane, WA · 30 beds

Inland Northwest Behavioral Health

0.6 miles
Not Rated N/A
Spokane, WA · 100 beds

Prov Sacred Hrt Med Ctr & Childs Hosp.

0.8 miles
★★☆☆☆ 2/5
Spokane, WA · 615 beds

Providence Holy Family Hospital

3.6 miles
★★☆☆☆ 2/5
Spokane, WA · 272 beds

Spokane Va Medical Center

4.1 miles
★★★★★ 5/5
Spokane, WA · 206 beds

Multicare Valley Hospital

8.8 miles
★★★★★ 5/5
Spokane Valley, WA · 123 beds

Eastern State Hospital

13.4 miles
Not Rated N/A
Medical Lake, WA · 287 beds

View all hospitals near 99201, WA →

Switching hospitals may mean switching plans. Check the Medicare enrollment timeline to make sure you don't miss your window, and use our enrollment checklist to stay organized.

Location & Directions

Address: W 800 Fifth Avenue, Spokane, WA 99210
Phone: (509) 473-5800

Get directions on Google Maps →

What to Do with This Information

Hospital quality data is most useful when paired with your specific situation. Here's how to act on it:

  • Check network status: Before choosing this hospital, verify it's in-network for your Medicare Advantage plan. Out-of-network care can cost significantly more.
  • Ask about specific outcomes: If you're considering an elective procedure, ask the hospital for their outcomes data on that specific surgery — not just overall ratings.
  • Compare nearby options: Use the nearby hospitals section above to compare quality scores across facilities in the area.
  • Review your Medicare plan: Your plan's network determines which hospitals you can access affordably. Use our enrollment checklist to stay organized if you're switching plans. Check enrollment deadlines →
  • Talk to your doctor: Ask your primary care physician which hospitals they're affiliated with and whether they're in-network for your plan. Print our doctor questions checklist →
View on Medicare.gov Compare Medicare Plans in 99201, WA →

Deaconess Medical Center: Common Questions

What does a 3-star rating mean for Deaconess Medical Center?

CMS rates hospitals on a 1-to-5 star scale based on quality measures across mortality, safety, readmission, patient experience, and timely care. A 3-star rating means this hospital meets the national average across these domains. The rating is updated quarterly by CMS.

Does Deaconess Medical Center have an emergency room?

Yes, Deaconess Medical Center operates an emergency department.

How many doctors are affiliated with Deaconess Medical Center?

589 physicians are affiliated with this hospital according to CMS Physician Compare data. This includes 82 surgeons.

Does Deaconess Medical Center accept Medicare?

Yes. All hospitals listed on Medicare Hospital Compare are Medicare-certified facilities. However, whether this hospital is in-network for your specific Medicare Advantage plan depends on your plan's provider network. Check your plan documents or call your insurer to verify.

How many beds does Deaconess Medical Center have?

Deaconess Medical Center has 388 licensed beds. Bed count is an indicator of hospital capacity — larger hospitals often offer more specialized services.

Where does the data on this page come from?

All data is sourced from official CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) databases: Hospital Compare for quality measures and star ratings, Provider of Services for beds and services, and Physician Compare for doctor affiliations. Data is updated quarterly. Read our full methodology →

About the Reviewer

Wes Ward

Wes Ward

Founder & Data Lead

Wes Ward is the founder of InsuranceDataNow.org and reviews all hospital quality data and methodology for accuracy. Every hospital profile — including the CMS quality measures, infection rates, and doctor affiliations on this page — goes through his data-validation pipeline before publication.

With 25+ years in data analytics — including work with highly regulated genomic data at Ancestry.com — Wes brings enterprise-level rigor to healthcare transparency. He is also a co-founder of BestNeighborhood.org, CrimeGrade.org, and ISPReports.org.

View full profile →LinkedIn

Data sources: CMS Hospital Compare (February 2026), Provider of Services (Q4 2025), CMS Physician Compare, CDC NHSN. This page is for informational purposes only. Always verify information directly with the hospital. Read our full methodology →

Medicare Resources

Hospital quality data is just one piece of the Medicare puzzle. Explore our guides to make the best decisions for your coverage:

Does your Medicare plan cover Deaconess Medical Center?

Compare Plans in 99201, WA →