Hospital Profile

Dekalb Regional Medical Center

200 Med Center Drive
Fort Payne, AL 35968
★★★☆☆
3/5 CMS Overall Rating
134
Licensed Beds
Acute Care
Hospital Type
118
Affiliated Doctors
Limited
Critical Care
0.9:1
Nurse-to-Bed Ratio
Data Source: Hospital data from CMS Hospital Compare (February 2026) and Provider of Services file (Q4 2025). Doctor affiliations from CMS Physician Compare. Quality measures are updated quarterly.
Reviewed by: Wes Ward, Founder & Data Lead • View our methodology

Hospital Details

Dekalb Regional Medical Center is a 3.00-star acute care hospital located in Fort Payne, Alabama with 134 licensed beds. As a for-profit facility, it operates with a different financial structure than non-profit hospitals in the region.

Its 3-star CMS rating is at the national average — it meets baseline quality standards across key domains. 118 physicians are affiliated with this facility, and it provides emergency services. Its critical care footprint covers 2 of 8 unit types (Limited) with a 0.9:1 nurse-to-bed ratio.

Hospital Type Acute Care Hospitals
Ownership Proprietary
Teaching Status Non-Teaching Hospital

Quality Ratings & Measures

CMS evaluates hospitals across five quality domains. Here's how Dekalb Regional Medical Center compares:

3
Overall Rating
of 5 stars
💔
Same as National
Mortality
0 of 4 better
🛡️
Same as National
Safety
0 of 4 better
🔄
Same as National
Readmission
0 of 8 better
😊
All 8 domains reported
Patient Experience
8 measures
💰
0.9900
Medicare Spending Index (MSPB)
Near National Avg

Quality data from CMS Hospital Compare. "Better than national" means statistically significantly better than the national average. Spending uses the CMS MSPB measure (Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary) index, where 1.000 is national average and values above/below 1.000 indicate higher/lower spending.

Patient Experience (HCAHPS Survey)

The HCAHPS survey is a standardized, national survey of hospital patients. It measures how patients perceive their care — including communication with doctors and nurses, responsiveness of staff, cleanliness, and discharge information. Higher percentages indicate better performance.

MeasureScoreStar Rating
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Always" clean61%N/A
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Sometimes" or "Never" clean16%N/A
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Usually" clean23%N/A
Cleanliness - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Cleanliness - star ratingNot Applicable%★★☆☆☆ (2)
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" communicated well82%N/A
Nurse communication - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well3%N/A
Nurse communication - star ratingNot Applicable%★★★★☆ (4)
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" communicated well15%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" communicated well82%N/A
Doctor communication - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well5%N/A
Doctor communication - star ratingNot Applicable%★★★★☆ (4)
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" communicated well13%N/A
Patients who reported that staff "Always" explained about medicines before giving it to them62%N/A
Communication about medicines - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Patients who reported that staff "Sometimes" or "Never" explained about medicines before giving it to them20%N/A
Communication about medicines - star ratingNot Applicable%★★★☆☆ (3)
Patients who reported that staff "Usually" explained about medicines before giving it to them18%N/A
Discharge information - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Patients who reported that NO, they were not given information about what to do during their recovery at home13%N/A
Discharge information - star ratingNot Applicable%★★★☆☆ (3)
Patients who reported that YES, they were given information about what to do during their recovery at home87%N/A
Patients who reported that NO, they did not discuss whether they would need help after discharge16%N/A
Patients who reported that YES, they did discuss whether they would need help after discharge84%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" explained things in a way they could understand77%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand8%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand15%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" listened carefully to them79%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them5%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" listened carefully to them16%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect90%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect3%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect7%N/A
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 6 or lower on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)11%N/A
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 7 or 8 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)28%N/A
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 9 or 10 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)61%N/A
Overall hospital rating - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Overall hospital rating - star ratingNot Applicable%★★☆☆☆ (2)
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" communicated what the medication was for79%N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated what the medication was for9%N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" communicated what the medication was for.12%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" explained things in a way they could understand78%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand4%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand18%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" listened carefully to them78%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them2%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" listened carefully to them20%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect89%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect1%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect10%N/A
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Always" quiet at night59%N/A
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Sometimes" or "Never" quiet at night7%N/A
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Usually" quiet at night34%N/A
Quietness - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Quietness - star ratingNot Applicable%★★★★☆ (4)
Patients who reported NO, they would probably not or definitely not recommend the hospital6%N/A
Patients who reported YES, they would definitely recommend the hospital60%N/A
Recommend hospital - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Patients who reported YES, they would probably recommend the hospital34%N/A
Recommend hospital - star ratingNot Applicable%★★★☆☆ (3)
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" discussed possible side effects45%N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" discussed possible side effects31%N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" discussed possible side effects24%N/A
Summary star ratingNot Applicable%★★★☆☆ (3)
Patients who reported that NO, they did not receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge10%N/A
Patients who reported that YES, they did receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge90%N/A

Survey response rate: 15% (282 surveys completed). Data from 04/01/2024 to 03/31/2025 .

Services & Specialties

Dekalb Regional Medical Center offers the following services based on CMS Provider of Services data:

Emergency & Critical Care

Dekalb Regional Medical Center offers 2 of 8 possible critical care capabilities, classified as Limited. Limited critical care (1–2 unit types) means this facility can stabilize patients but may need to transfer more serious cases. If you anticipate needing emergency or ICU services frequently, compare nearby alternatives in the nearby hospitals section.

🚨 Emergency Department
🏥 Intensive Care Unit (ICU)

Surgical Services

🏥 Inpatient Surgery
🏢 Outpatient Surgery
💓 Cardiac Catheterization Lab
👁️ Ophthalmic Surgery

Specialty Services

🤰 Obstetrics (OB)
👶 Neonatal Nursery
🧒 Pediatric Services
🌬️ Respiratory Care

Service availability is self-reported by the facility. Confirm specific services directly with the hospital. Use our printable question list to prepare for the conversation.

Bed Count, Capacity & Staffing

Dekalb Regional Medical Center has 134 licensed beds (134 Medicare-certified) with a nurse-to-bed ratio of 0.9:1. Higher ratios generally indicate more nursing staff per patient, which research links to better outcomes in medication errors, patient falls, and response times.

Bed Type Count
Total Licensed Beds134
CMS Certified Beds134
Psychiatric Unit Beds18
Staffing snapshot: 118 affiliated physicians • 121 registered nurses

Doctors Affiliated with Dekalb Regional Medical Center

118 physicians are affiliated with Dekalb Regional Medical Center, including 16 surgeons. Doctor affiliations are sourced from CMS Physician Compare data and indicate physicians who have a formal relationship with this hospital.

118
Total Doctors
17
Procedural Specialists
16
Surgeons

Featured Affiliated Physicians

David J. Herren
Cataract surgery
NPI: 1194083451
Cesar T. Fernandez
Upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy for acid reflux
NPI: 1659363109
Jeffrey H. Thompson
Upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy for acid reflux
NPI: 1780607457
Steven A. Isbell
Colonoscopy
NPI: 1881659084
Jeffrey R. Cole
Upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy for acid reflux
NPI: 1114100559
Alejandro Vasquez
Coronary angioplasty and stenting
NPI: 1164493367

Showing 118 of 118 affiliated physicians. Doctor affiliations from CMS Physician Compare data.

Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAI)

Healthcare-associated infections are one of the most important safety metrics when evaluating a hospital. These infections are acquired during a hospital stay, not the reason for admission. CMS tracks rates for specific infection types and compares each hospital to the national benchmark.

Infection TypeScore (SIR)vs. National
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence LimitNot AvailableNot Available
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence LimitNot AvailableNot Available
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection: Number of Device Days626Not Available
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases0.436Not Available
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases0Not Available
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards)Not AvailableNot Available
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit0.482No Different than National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit5.161No Different than National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Number of Urinary Catheter Days2317No Different than National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases1.582No Different than National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases3No Different than National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards)1.896No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Colon Surgery: Lower Confidence LimitNot AvailableNot Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Upper Confidence LimitNot AvailableNot Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Number of Procedures20Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Predicted Cases0.515Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Observed Cases0Not Available
SSI - Colon SurgeryNot AvailableNot Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Lower Confidence LimitNot AvailableNot Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Upper Confidence LimitNot AvailableNot Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Number of Procedures42Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Predicted Cases0.386Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Observed Cases1Not Available
SSI - Abdominal HysterectomyNot AvailableNot Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Lower Confidence LimitNot AvailableNot Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Upper Confidence LimitNot AvailableNot Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Patient Days8484Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Predicted Cases0.291Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Observed Cases0Not Available
MRSA BacteremiaNot AvailableNot Available
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Lower Confidence LimitN/ABetter than the National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Upper Confidence Limit0.927Better than the National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Patient Days8484Better than the National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Predicted Cases3.233Better than the National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Observed Cases0Better than the National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff)0.000Better than the National Benchmark

How to read this: "Better than national" means the hospital's infection rate is statistically significantly lower than the national average — a sign of strong infection-control protocols (hand hygiene, sterilization, catheter management). "Worse than national" may warrant asking the hospital about their improvement initiatives.

Infection data reported to the CDC's National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN).

Complications & Deaths

CMS tracks post-surgical complications and mortality rates for common procedures and conditions (heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, hip/knee replacement, and more). These measures reflect how patients actually fare at this hospital compared to the national average.

MeasureScorePatientsvs. National
Rate of complications for hip/knee replacement patients5.366No Different Than the National Rate
Hybrid Hospital-Wide All-Cause Risk Standardized Mortality Rate4.6254No Different Than the National Rate
Death rate for heart attack patients12.843No Different Than the National Rate
Death rate for CABG surgery patientsN/AN/ANot Available
Death rate for COPD patients9.525No Different Than the National Rate
Death rate for heart failure patients15.978No Different Than the National Rate
Death rate for pneumonia patients19.8126No Different Than the National Rate
Death rate for stroke patientsN/AN/ANumber of Cases Too Small
Pressure ulcer rate0.48631No Different Than the National Rate
Death rate among surgical inpatients with serious treatable complicationsN/AN/ANumber of Cases Too Small
Iatrogenic pneumothorax rate0.201,095No Different Than the National Rate
In-hospital fall-associated fracture rate0.261,053No Different Than the National Rate
Postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma rate2.28209No Different Than the National Rate
Postoperative acute kidney injury requiring dialysis rate1.66100No Different Than the National Rate
Postoperative respiratory failure rate11.34105No Different Than the National Rate
Perioperative pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis rate3.25212No Different Than the National Rate
Postoperative sepsis rate6.0497No Different Than the National Rate
Postoperative wound dehiscence rate1.7434No Different Than the National Rate
Abdominopelvic accidental puncture or laceration rate1.03103No Different Than the National Rate
CMS Medicare PSI 90: Patient safety and adverse events composite1.02N/ANo Different Than the National Value

What to consider: A "worse than national" rating on mortality or complications is a serious signal — particularly for elective procedures where you have time to choose a facility. For emergency care, proximity and speed often outweigh these metrics. Ask the hospital about their outcomes for your specific procedure.

Readmissions & Unplanned Hospital Visits

A readmission means a patient returned to the hospital within 30 days of discharge. High readmission rates can signal gaps in discharge planning, patient education, or follow-up care coordination. CMS penalizes hospitals with excess readmissions through the HRRP.

MeasureScorePatientsvs. National
Hospital return days for heart attack patients41.155More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
Hospital return days for heart failure patients4098More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
Hospital return days for pneumonia patients2.3142Average Days per 100 Discharges
Hybrid Hospital-Wide All-Cause Readmission Measure (HWR)15.1387No Different Than the National Rate
Rate of unplanned hospital visits after colonoscopy (per 1,000 colonoscopies)14590No Different Than the National Rate
Rate of inpatient admissions for patients receiving outpatient chemotherapyN/A0Not Available
Rate of emergency department (ED) visits for patients receiving outpatient chemotherapyN/A0Not Available
Ratio of unplanned hospital visits after hospital outpatient surgery179No Different than expected
Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) 30-Day Readmission Rate14.355No Different Than the National Rate
Rate of readmission for CABGN/A0Not Available
Rate of readmission for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients18.125No Different Than the National Rate
Heart failure (HF) 30-Day Readmission Rate21.398No Different Than the National Rate
Rate of readmission after hip/knee replacement4.569No Different Than the National Rate
Pneumonia (PN) 30-Day Readmission Rate16.3142No Different Than the National Rate

What to ask: If this hospital has higher-than-average readmission rates, ask about their discharge process — do they provide follow-up appointments, medication reconciliation, and clear care instructions before you leave?

Nearby Hospitals

If Dekalb Regional Medical Center isn't in your Medicare plan's network — or you want to compare quality ratings before a procedure — these are the closest alternatives within 50 miles:

Floyd Cherokee Medical Center

20.3 miles
Not Rated N/A
Centre, AL · 60 beds

Highlands Medical Center

22.5 miles
★★★☆☆ 3/5
Scottsboro, AL · 170 beds

Marshall Medical Centers

28.7 miles
★★★☆☆ 3/5
Boaz, AL · 240 beds

Mountain View Hospital

30.1 miles
Not Rated N/A
Gadsden, AL · 68 beds

Gadsden Regional Medical Center

32.3 miles
★☆☆☆☆ 1/5
Gadsden, AL · 346 beds

Riverview Regional Medical Center

32.8 miles
★★☆☆☆ 2/5
Gadsden, AL · 281 beds

Atrium Health Floyd Medical Center

35.3 miles
★☆☆☆☆ 1/5
Rome, GA · 284 beds

Adventhealth Redmond

36.1 miles
★★★★☆ 4/5
Rome, GA · 201 beds

Atrium Health Floyd Polk Medical Center

43.6 miles
Not Rated N/A
Cedartown, GA · 25 beds

Chi Memorial Hospital- Georgia

45.6 miles
Not Rated N/A
Fort Oglethorpe, GA · 179 beds

Moccasin Bend Mental Health Institute

46.9 miles
Not Rated N/A
Chattanooga, TN · 172 beds

Adventhealth Gordon

47.6 miles
★★★☆☆ 3/5
Calhoun, GA · 69 beds

Parkridge Medical Center

49.5 miles
★★★☆☆ 3/5
Chattanooga, TN · 621 beds

Erlanger Medical Center

49.6 miles
★★★☆☆ 3/5
Chattanooga, TN · 848 beds

View all hospitals near 35968, AL →

Switching hospitals may mean switching plans. Check the Medicare enrollment timeline to make sure you don't miss your window, and use our enrollment checklist to stay organized.

Location & Directions

Address: 200 Med Center Drive, Fort Payne, AL 35968
Phone: (256) 845-3150

Get directions on Google Maps →

What to Do with This Information

Hospital quality data is most useful when paired with your specific situation. Here's how to act on it:

  • Check network status: Before choosing this hospital, verify it's in-network for your Medicare Advantage plan. Out-of-network care can cost significantly more.
  • Ask about specific outcomes: If you're considering an elective procedure, ask the hospital for their outcomes data on that specific surgery — not just overall ratings.
  • Compare nearby options: Use the nearby hospitals section above to compare quality scores across facilities in the area.
  • Review your Medicare plan: Your plan's network determines which hospitals you can access affordably. Use our enrollment checklist to stay organized if you're switching plans. Check enrollment deadlines →
  • Talk to your doctor: Ask your primary care physician which hospitals they're affiliated with and whether they're in-network for your plan. Print our doctor questions checklist →
View on Medicare.gov Compare Medicare Plans in 35968, AL →

Dekalb Regional Medical Center: Common Questions

What does a 3-star rating mean for Dekalb Regional Medical Center?

CMS rates hospitals on a 1-to-5 star scale based on quality measures across mortality, safety, readmission, patient experience, and timely care. A 3-star rating means this hospital meets the national average across these domains. The rating is updated quarterly by CMS.

Does Dekalb Regional Medical Center have an emergency room?

Yes, Dekalb Regional Medical Center operates an emergency department.

How many doctors are affiliated with Dekalb Regional Medical Center?

118 physicians are affiliated with this hospital according to CMS Physician Compare data. This includes 16 surgeons.

Does Dekalb Regional Medical Center accept Medicare?

Yes. All hospitals listed on Medicare Hospital Compare are Medicare-certified facilities. However, whether this hospital is in-network for your specific Medicare Advantage plan depends on your plan's provider network. Check your plan documents or call your insurer to verify.

How many beds does Dekalb Regional Medical Center have?

Dekalb Regional Medical Center has 134 licensed beds. Bed count is an indicator of hospital capacity — larger hospitals often offer more specialized services.

Where does the data on this page come from?

All data is sourced from official CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) databases: Hospital Compare for quality measures and star ratings, Provider of Services for beds and services, and Physician Compare for doctor affiliations. Data is updated quarterly. Read our full methodology →

About the Reviewer

Wes Ward

Wes Ward

Founder & Data Lead

Wes Ward is the founder of InsuranceDataNow.org and reviews all hospital quality data and methodology for accuracy. Every hospital profile — including the CMS quality measures, infection rates, and doctor affiliations on this page — goes through his data-validation pipeline before publication.

With 25+ years in data analytics — including work with highly regulated genomic data at Ancestry.com — Wes brings enterprise-level rigor to healthcare transparency. He is also a co-founder of BestNeighborhood.org, CrimeGrade.org, and ISPReports.org.

View full profile →LinkedIn

Data sources: CMS Hospital Compare (February 2026), Provider of Services (Q4 2025), CMS Physician Compare, CDC NHSN. This page is for informational purposes only. Always verify information directly with the hospital. Read our full methodology →

Medicare Resources

Hospital quality data is just one piece of the Medicare puzzle. Explore our guides to make the best decisions for your coverage:

Does your Medicare plan cover Dekalb Regional Medical Center?

Compare Plans in 35968, AL →