Hospital Profile

Covenant Medical Center

3615 19th Street
Lubbock, TX 79410
★★☆☆☆
2/5 CMS Overall Rating
470
Licensed Beds
Acute Care
Hospital Type
539
Affiliated Doctors
Moderate
Critical Care
2.7:1
Nurse-to-Bed Ratio
Data Source: Hospital data from CMS Hospital Compare (February 2026) and Provider of Services file (Q4 2025). Doctor affiliations from CMS Physician Compare. Quality measures are updated quarterly.
Reviewed by: Wes Ward, Founder & Data Lead • View our methodology

Hospital Details

Covenant Medical Center is a 2.00-star acute care hospital located in Lubbock, Texas with 470 licensed beds. As a private non-profit, its revenue is reinvested into patient care and community programs. As a major teaching hospital, it is affiliated with a medical school and typically offers the most advanced procedures and clinical trials.

Its 2-star CMS rating is below the national average, which may indicate opportunities for improvement across quality domains. 539 physicians are affiliated with this facility, and it provides emergency services. Its critical care footprint covers 4 of 8 unit types (Moderate) with a 2.7:1 nurse-to-bed ratio.

Hospital Type Acute Care Hospitals
Ownership Voluntary non-profit - Private
Teaching Status Major Teaching Hospital

Quality Ratings & Measures

CMS evaluates hospitals across five quality domains. Here's how Covenant Medical Center compares:

2
Overall Rating
of 5 stars
💔
Worse than National
Mortality
0 of 7 better
🛡️
Better than National
Safety
4 of 7 better
🔄
Better than National
Readmission
2 of 9 better
😊
All 8 domains reported
Patient Experience
8 measures
💰
1.1300
Medicare Spending Index (MSPB)
Above National Avg (Higher Spending)

Quality data from CMS Hospital Compare. "Better than national" means statistically significantly better than the national average. Spending uses the CMS MSPB measure (Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary) index, where 1.000 is national average and values above/below 1.000 indicate higher/lower spending.

Patient Experience (HCAHPS Survey)

The HCAHPS survey is a standardized, national survey of hospital patients. It measures how patients perceive their care — including communication with doctors and nurses, responsiveness of staff, cleanliness, and discharge information. Higher percentages indicate better performance.

MeasureScoreStar Rating
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Always" clean64%N/A
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Sometimes" or "Never" clean10%N/A
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Usually" clean26%N/A
Cleanliness - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Cleanliness - star ratingNot Applicable%★★★☆☆ (3)
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" communicated well75%N/A
Nurse communication - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well5%N/A
Nurse communication - star ratingNot Applicable%★★★☆☆ (3)
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" communicated well20%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" communicated well74%N/A
Doctor communication - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well7%N/A
Doctor communication - star ratingNot Applicable%★★☆☆☆ (2)
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" communicated well19%N/A
Patients who reported that staff "Always" explained about medicines before giving it to them59%N/A
Communication about medicines - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Patients who reported that staff "Sometimes" or "Never" explained about medicines before giving it to them21%N/A
Communication about medicines - star ratingNot Applicable%★★☆☆☆ (2)
Patients who reported that staff "Usually" explained about medicines before giving it to them20%N/A
Discharge information - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Patients who reported that NO, they were not given information about what to do during their recovery at home17%N/A
Discharge information - star ratingNot Applicable%★★☆☆☆ (2)
Patients who reported that YES, they were given information about what to do during their recovery at home83%N/A
Patients who reported that NO, they did not discuss whether they would need help after discharge18%N/A
Patients who reported that YES, they did discuss whether they would need help after discharge82%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" explained things in a way they could understand70%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand8%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand22%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" listened carefully to them71%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them8%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" listened carefully to them21%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect82%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect4%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect14%N/A
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 6 or lower on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)9%N/A
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 7 or 8 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)22%N/A
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 9 or 10 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)69%N/A
Overall hospital rating - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Overall hospital rating - star ratingNot Applicable%★★★☆☆ (3)
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" communicated what the medication was for74%N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated what the medication was for9%N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" communicated what the medication was for.17%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" explained things in a way they could understand72%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand7%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand21%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" listened carefully to them70%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them5%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" listened carefully to them25%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect83%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect4%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect13%N/A
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Always" quiet at night58%N/A
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Sometimes" or "Never" quiet at night12%N/A
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Usually" quiet at night30%N/A
Quietness - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Quietness - star ratingNot Applicable%★★★☆☆ (3)
Patients who reported NO, they would probably not or definitely not recommend the hospital5%N/A
Patients who reported YES, they would definitely recommend the hospital70%N/A
Recommend hospital - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Patients who reported YES, they would probably recommend the hospital25%N/A
Recommend hospital - star ratingNot Applicable%★★★★☆ (4)
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" discussed possible side effects44%N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" discussed possible side effects33%N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" discussed possible side effects23%N/A
Summary star ratingNot Applicable%★★★☆☆ (3)
Patients who reported that NO, they did not receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge16%N/A
Patients who reported that YES, they did receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge84%N/A

Survey response rate: 17% (688 surveys completed). Data from 04/01/2024 to 03/31/2025 .

Services & Specialties

Covenant Medical Center offers the following services based on CMS Provider of Services data:

Emergency & Critical Care

Covenant Medical Center offers 4 of 8 possible critical care capabilities, classified as Moderate. Moderate critical care (3–5 unit types) covers many common emergencies but may require transfers for specialized trauma, burns, or pediatric/neonatal intensive care. Consider whether your likely health needs are covered.

🚨 Emergency Department
🏥 Intensive Care Unit (ICU)
🔬 Surgical ICU
🆘 Shock-Trauma

Surgical Services

🏥 Inpatient Surgery
🏢 Outpatient Surgery
❤️ Open-Heart Surgery
🧠 Neurosurgery
💓 Cardiac Catheterization Lab
Reconstructive Surgery
👁️ Ophthalmic Surgery

Specialty Services

💉 Chemotherapy
🌬️ Respiratory Care

Service availability is self-reported by the facility. Confirm specific services directly with the hospital. Use our printable question list to prepare for the conversation.

Bed Count, Capacity & Staffing

Covenant Medical Center has 470 licensed beds (470 Medicare-certified) with a nurse-to-bed ratio of 2.7:1. Higher ratios generally indicate more nursing staff per patient, which research links to better outcomes in medication errors, patient falls, and response times.

Bed Type Count
Total Licensed Beds470
CMS Certified Beds470
Psychiatric Unit Beds48
Staffing snapshot: 539 affiliated physicians • 1250 registered nurses • 24 operating rooms

Doctors Affiliated with Covenant Medical Center

539 physicians are affiliated with Covenant Medical Center, including 84 surgeons. Doctor affiliations are sourced from CMS Physician Compare data and indicate physicians who have a formal relationship with this hospital.

539
Total Doctors
102
Procedural Specialists
84
Surgeons

Featured Affiliated Physicians

Timothy T. Khater
Cataract surgery
NPI: 1669476255
Rafiul S. Islam
Upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy for acid reflux
NPI: 1043473820
Houssam Al Kharrat
Upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy for acid reflux
NPI: 1295734424
Matthew P. Soape
Upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy for acid reflux
NPI: 1477815124
Timothy D. Miller
Upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy for acid reflux
NPI: 1346419355
Joseph J. Wolcott
Varicose vein removal
NPI: 1114119872

Showing 539 of 539 affiliated physicians. Doctor affiliations from CMS Physician Compare data.

Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAI)

Healthcare-associated infections are one of the most important safety metrics when evaluating a hospital. These infections are acquired during a hospital stay, not the reason for admission. CMS tracks rates for specific infection types and compares each hospital to the national benchmark.

Infection TypeScore (SIR)vs. National
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit0.085Better than the National Benchmark
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit0.644Better than the National Benchmark
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection: Number of Device Days13944Better than the National Benchmark
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases14.978Better than the National Benchmark
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases4Better than the National Benchmark
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards)0.267Better than the National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit0.108Better than the National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit0.554Better than the National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Number of Urinary Catheter Days15008Better than the National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases22.520Better than the National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases6Better than the National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards)0.266Better than the National Benchmark
SSI - Colon Surgery: Lower Confidence Limit0.907No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Colon Surgery: Upper Confidence Limit2.516No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Colon Surgery: Number of Procedures349No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Colon Surgery: Predicted Cases9.612No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Colon Surgery: Observed Cases15No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Colon Surgery1.561No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Lower Confidence LimitNot AvailableNot Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Upper Confidence LimitNot AvailableNot Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Number of Procedures22Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Predicted Cases0.187Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Observed Cases0Not Available
SSI - Abdominal HysterectomyNot AvailableNot Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Lower Confidence Limit0.208No Different than National Benchmark
MRSA Bacteremia: Upper Confidence Limit1.070No Different than National Benchmark
MRSA Bacteremia: Patient Days115719No Different than National Benchmark
MRSA Bacteremia: Predicted Cases11.664No Different than National Benchmark
MRSA Bacteremia: Observed Cases6No Different than National Benchmark
MRSA Bacteremia0.514No Different than National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Lower Confidence Limit0.625No Different than National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Upper Confidence Limit1.116No Different than National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Patient Days115719No Different than National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Predicted Cases54.487No Different than National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Observed Cases46No Different than National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff)0.844No Different than National Benchmark

How to read this: "Better than national" means the hospital's infection rate is statistically significantly lower than the national average — a sign of strong infection-control protocols (hand hygiene, sterilization, catheter management). "Worse than national" may warrant asking the hospital about their improvement initiatives.

Infection data reported to the CDC's National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN).

Complications & Deaths

CMS tracks post-surgical complications and mortality rates for common procedures and conditions (heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, hip/knee replacement, and more). These measures reflect how patients actually fare at this hospital compared to the national average.

MeasureScorePatientsvs. National
Rate of complications for hip/knee replacement patientsN/AN/ANumber of Cases Too Small
Hybrid Hospital-Wide All-Cause Risk Standardized Mortality Rate42,176No Different Than the National Rate
Death rate for heart attack patients12.9223No Different Than the National Rate
Death rate for CABG surgery patients2.843No Different Than the National Rate
Death rate for COPD patients11.9114No Different Than the National Rate
Death rate for heart failure patients9.5466No Different Than the National Rate
Death rate for pneumonia patients15.1671No Different Than the National Rate
Death rate for stroke patients15.5490No Different Than the National Rate
Pressure ulcer rate0.198,178No Different Than the National Rate
Death rate among surgical inpatients with serious treatable complications234.10103Worse Than the National Rate
Iatrogenic pneumothorax rate0.148,787No Different Than the National Rate
In-hospital fall-associated fracture rate0.228,816No Different Than the National Rate
Postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma rate3.222,318No Different Than the National Rate
Postoperative acute kidney injury requiring dialysis rate1.38582No Different Than the National Rate
Postoperative respiratory failure rate9.84583No Different Than the National Rate
Perioperative pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis rate1.312,522Better Than the National Rate
Postoperative sepsis rate4.48545No Different Than the National Rate
Postoperative wound dehiscence rate1.88588No Different Than the National Rate
Abdominopelvic accidental puncture or laceration rate1.121,891No Different Than the National Rate
CMS Medicare PSI 90: Patient safety and adverse events composite0.74N/ANo Different Than the National Value

What to consider: A "worse than national" rating on mortality or complications is a serious signal — particularly for elective procedures where you have time to choose a facility. For emergency care, proximity and speed often outweigh these metrics. Ask the hospital about their outcomes for your specific procedure.

Readmissions & Unplanned Hospital Visits

A readmission means a patient returned to the hospital within 30 days of discharge. High readmission rates can signal gaps in discharge planning, patient education, or follow-up care coordination. CMS penalizes hospitals with excess readmissions through the HRRP.

MeasureScorePatientsvs. National
Hospital return days for heart attack patients-15.6228Fewer Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
Hospital return days for heart failure patients-9.9507Average Days per 100 Discharges
Hospital return days for pneumonia patients-6.8666Average Days per 100 Discharges
Hybrid Hospital-Wide All-Cause Readmission Measure (HWR)13.53,522Better Than the National Rate
Rate of unplanned hospital visits after colonoscopy (per 1,000 colonoscopies)12.5245No Different Than the National Rate
Rate of inpatient admissions for patients receiving outpatient chemotherapyN/A0Number of Cases Too Small
Rate of emergency department (ED) visits for patients receiving outpatient chemotherapyN/A0Number of Cases Too Small
Ratio of unplanned hospital visits after hospital outpatient surgery1.1396No Different than expected
Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) 30-Day Readmission Rate12.5228No Different Than the National Rate
Rate of readmission for CABG10.343No Different Than the National Rate
Rate of readmission for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients18.3119No Different Than the National Rate
Heart failure (HF) 30-Day Readmission Rate17.9507No Different Than the National Rate
Rate of readmission after hip/knee replacementN/A0Number of Cases Too Small
Pneumonia (PN) 30-Day Readmission Rate14.1666No Different Than the National Rate

What to ask: If this hospital has higher-than-average readmission rates, ask about their discharge process — do they provide follow-up appointments, medication reconciliation, and clear care instructions before you leave?

Nearby Hospitals

If Covenant Medical Center isn't in your Medicare plan's network — or you want to compare quality ratings before a procedure — these are the closest alternatives within 15 miles:

Covenant Childrens Hospital

0.6 miles
Not Rated N/A
Lubbock, TX · 212 beds

University Medical Center

1 miles
★★★☆☆ 3/5
Lubbock, TX · 503 beds

Lubbock Heart Hospital Lp

2.3 miles
★★☆☆☆ 2/5
Lubbock, TX · 74 beds

Grace Surgical Hospital

2.3 miles
★★★☆☆ 3/5
Lubbock, TX · 123 beds

Oceans Behavioral Hospital Of Lubbock

2.8 miles
Not Rated N/A
Lubbock, TX · 32 beds

Exceptional Community Hospital Lubbock

4.4 miles
Not Rated N/A
Lubbock, TX · 7 beds

Starcare Specialty Health /Sunrise Canyon Hospital

4.9 miles
Not Rated N/A
Lubbock, TX · 30 beds

View all hospitals near 79410, TX →

Switching hospitals may mean switching plans. Check the Medicare enrollment timeline to make sure you don't miss your window, and use our enrollment checklist to stay organized.

Location & Directions

Address: 3615 19th Street, Lubbock, TX 79410
Phone: (806) 725-4431

Get directions on Google Maps →

What to Do with This Information

Hospital quality data is most useful when paired with your specific situation. Here's how to act on it:

  • Check network status: Before choosing this hospital, verify it's in-network for your Medicare Advantage plan. Out-of-network care can cost significantly more.
  • Ask about specific outcomes: If you're considering an elective procedure, ask the hospital for their outcomes data on that specific surgery — not just overall ratings.
  • Compare nearby options: Use the nearby hospitals section above to compare quality scores across facilities in the area.
  • Review your Medicare plan: Your plan's network determines which hospitals you can access affordably. Use our enrollment checklist to stay organized if you're switching plans. Check enrollment deadlines →
  • Talk to your doctor: Ask your primary care physician which hospitals they're affiliated with and whether they're in-network for your plan. Print our doctor questions checklist →
View on Medicare.gov Compare Medicare Plans in 79410, TX →

Covenant Medical Center: Common Questions

What does a 2-star rating mean for Covenant Medical Center?

CMS rates hospitals on a 1-to-5 star scale based on quality measures across mortality, safety, readmission, patient experience, and timely care. A 2-star rating indicates this hospital is below the national average on some measures. The rating is updated quarterly by CMS.

Does Covenant Medical Center have an emergency room?

Yes, Covenant Medical Center operates an emergency department.

How many doctors are affiliated with Covenant Medical Center?

539 physicians are affiliated with this hospital according to CMS Physician Compare data. This includes 84 surgeons.

Does Covenant Medical Center accept Medicare?

Yes. All hospitals listed on Medicare Hospital Compare are Medicare-certified facilities. However, whether this hospital is in-network for your specific Medicare Advantage plan depends on your plan's provider network. Check your plan documents or call your insurer to verify.

How many beds does Covenant Medical Center have?

Covenant Medical Center has 470 licensed beds. Bed count is an indicator of hospital capacity — larger hospitals often offer more specialized services.

Where does the data on this page come from?

All data is sourced from official CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) databases: Hospital Compare for quality measures and star ratings, Provider of Services for beds and services, and Physician Compare for doctor affiliations. Data is updated quarterly. Read our full methodology →

About the Reviewer

Wes Ward

Wes Ward

Founder & Data Lead

Wes Ward is the founder of InsuranceDataNow.org and reviews all hospital quality data and methodology for accuracy. Every hospital profile — including the CMS quality measures, infection rates, and doctor affiliations on this page — goes through his data-validation pipeline before publication.

With 25+ years in data analytics — including work with highly regulated genomic data at Ancestry.com — Wes brings enterprise-level rigor to healthcare transparency. He is also a co-founder of BestNeighborhood.org, CrimeGrade.org, and ISPReports.org.

View full profile →LinkedIn

Data sources: CMS Hospital Compare (February 2026), Provider of Services (Q4 2025), CMS Physician Compare, CDC NHSN. This page is for informational purposes only. Always verify information directly with the hospital. Read our full methodology →

Medicare Resources

Hospital quality data is just one piece of the Medicare puzzle. Explore our guides to make the best decisions for your coverage:

Does your Medicare plan cover Covenant Medical Center?

Compare Plans in 79410, TX →