Hospital Profile

University Medical Center

602 Indiana Avenue
Lubbock, TX 79415
★★★☆☆
3/5 CMS Overall Rating
503
Licensed Beds
Acute Care
Hospital Type
659
Affiliated Doctors
None Reported
Critical Care
3.1:1
Nurse-to-Bed Ratio
Data Source: Hospital data from CMS Hospital Compare (February 2026) and Provider of Services file (Q4 2025). Doctor affiliations from CMS Physician Compare. Quality measures are updated quarterly.
Reviewed by: Wes Ward, Founder & Data Lead • View our methodology

Hospital Details

University Medical Center is a 3.00-star acute care hospital located in Lubbock, Texas with 503 licensed beds. As a major teaching hospital, it is affiliated with a medical school and typically offers the most advanced procedures and clinical trials.

Its 3-star CMS rating is at the national average — it meets baseline quality standards across key domains. 659 physicians are affiliated with this facility, and it provides emergency services. It reports a 3.1:1 nurse-to-bed ratio.

Hospital Type Acute Care Hospitals
Ownership Government - Hospital District or Authority
Teaching Status Major Teaching Hospital

Quality Ratings & Measures

CMS evaluates hospitals across five quality domains. Here's how University Medical Center compares:

3
Overall Rating
of 5 stars
💔
Same as National
Mortality
0 of 7 better
🛡️
Better than National
Safety
4 of 7 better
🔄
Worse than National
Readmission
0 of 10 better
😊
All 8 domains reported
Patient Experience
8 measures
💰
1.1600
Medicare Spending Index (MSPB)
Above National Avg (Higher Spending)

Quality data from CMS Hospital Compare. "Better than national" means statistically significantly better than the national average. Spending uses the CMS MSPB measure (Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary) index, where 1.000 is national average and values above/below 1.000 indicate higher/lower spending.

Patient Experience (HCAHPS Survey)

The HCAHPS survey is a standardized, national survey of hospital patients. It measures how patients perceive their care — including communication with doctors and nurses, responsiveness of staff, cleanliness, and discharge information. Higher percentages indicate better performance.

MeasureScoreStar Rating
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Always" clean73%N/A
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Sometimes" or "Never" clean9%N/A
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Usually" clean18%N/A
Cleanliness - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Cleanliness - star ratingNot Applicable%★★★☆☆ (3)
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" communicated well79%N/A
Nurse communication - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well4%N/A
Nurse communication - star ratingNot Applicable%★★★★☆ (4)
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" communicated well17%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" communicated well78%N/A
Doctor communication - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well6%N/A
Doctor communication - star ratingNot Applicable%★★★☆☆ (3)
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" communicated well16%N/A
Patients who reported that staff "Always" explained about medicines before giving it to them64%N/A
Communication about medicines - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Patients who reported that staff "Sometimes" or "Never" explained about medicines before giving it to them18%N/A
Communication about medicines - star ratingNot Applicable%★★★☆☆ (3)
Patients who reported that staff "Usually" explained about medicines before giving it to them18%N/A
Discharge information - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Patients who reported that NO, they were not given information about what to do during their recovery at home15%N/A
Discharge information - star ratingNot Applicable%★★★☆☆ (3)
Patients who reported that YES, they were given information about what to do during their recovery at home85%N/A
Patients who reported that NO, they did not discuss whether they would need help after discharge17%N/A
Patients who reported that YES, they did discuss whether they would need help after discharge83%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" explained things in a way they could understand72%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand8%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand20%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" listened carefully to them77%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them6%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" listened carefully to them17%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect84%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect4%N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect12%N/A
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 6 or lower on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)7%N/A
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 7 or 8 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)17%N/A
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 9 or 10 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)76%N/A
Overall hospital rating - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Overall hospital rating - star ratingNot Applicable%★★★★☆ (4)
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" communicated what the medication was for75%N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated what the medication was for9%N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" communicated what the medication was for.16%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" explained things in a way they could understand75%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand5%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand20%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" listened carefully to them76%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them4%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" listened carefully to them20%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect87%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect3%N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect10%N/A
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Always" quiet at night61%N/A
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Sometimes" or "Never" quiet at night10%N/A
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Usually" quiet at night29%N/A
Quietness - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Quietness - star ratingNot Applicable%★★★☆☆ (3)
Patients who reported NO, they would probably not or definitely not recommend the hospital4%N/A
Patients who reported YES, they would definitely recommend the hospital79%N/A
Recommend hospital - linear mean scoreNot Applicable%N/A
Patients who reported YES, they would probably recommend the hospital17%N/A
Recommend hospital - star ratingNot Applicable%★★★★★ (5)
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" discussed possible side effects53%N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" discussed possible side effects27%N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" discussed possible side effects20%N/A
Summary star ratingNot Applicable%★★★☆☆ (3)
Patients who reported that NO, they did not receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge13%N/A
Patients who reported that YES, they did receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge87%N/A

Survey response rate: 13% (1210 surveys completed). Data from 04/01/2024 to 03/31/2025 .

Services & Specialties

University Medical Center offers the following services based on CMS Provider of Services data:

Emergency & Critical Care

University Medical Center offers 0 of 8 possible critical care capabilities, classified as None Reported. No critical care capabilities are reported for this facility. If emergency access is important to your coverage, explore the nearby hospitals for alternatives.

No emergency/critical care services reported

Surgical Services

No surgical services reported

Specialty Services

🌬️ Respiratory Care

Service availability is self-reported by the facility. Confirm specific services directly with the hospital. Use our printable question list to prepare for the conversation.

Bed Count, Capacity & Staffing

University Medical Center has 503 licensed beds (503 Medicare-certified) with a nurse-to-bed ratio of 3.1:1. Higher ratios generally indicate more nursing staff per patient, which research links to better outcomes in medication errors, patient falls, and response times.

Bed Type Count
Total Licensed Beds503
CMS Certified Beds503
Staffing snapshot: 659 affiliated physicians • 1580 registered nurses • 34 operating rooms

Doctors Affiliated with University Medical Center

659 physicians are affiliated with University Medical Center, including 78 surgeons. Doctor affiliations are sourced from CMS Physician Compare data and indicate physicians who have a formal relationship with this hospital.

659
Total Doctors
102
Procedural Specialists
78
Surgeons

Featured Affiliated Physicians

Rafiul S. Islam
Upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy for acid reflux
NPI: 1043473820
Houssam Al Kharrat
Upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy for acid reflux
NPI: 1295734424
Kanak Das
Upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy for acid reflux
NPI: 1568604502
David Shephard, II
Knee replacement
NPI: 1700087350
Jordan B. Simpson
Knee replacement
NPI: 1104143957
Boyd S. Fenton
Upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy for acid reflux
NPI: 1174564694

Showing 659 of 659 affiliated physicians. Doctor affiliations from CMS Physician Compare data.

Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAI)

Healthcare-associated infections are one of the most important safety metrics when evaluating a hospital. These infections are acquired during a hospital stay, not the reason for admission. CMS tracks rates for specific infection types and compares each hospital to the national benchmark.

Infection TypeScore (SIR)vs. National
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit0.031Better than the National Benchmark
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit0.332Better than the National Benchmark
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection: Number of Device Days20269Better than the National Benchmark
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases24.586Better than the National Benchmark
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases3Better than the National Benchmark
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards)0.122Better than the National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit0.244Better than the National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit0.701Better than the National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Number of Urinary Catheter Days19805Better than the National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases32.715Better than the National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases14Better than the National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards)0.428Better than the National Benchmark
SSI - Colon Surgery: Lower Confidence Limit0.130Better than the National Benchmark
SSI - Colon Surgery: Upper Confidence Limit0.991Better than the National Benchmark
SSI - Colon Surgery: Number of Procedures303Better than the National Benchmark
SSI - Colon Surgery: Predicted Cases9.741Better than the National Benchmark
SSI - Colon Surgery: Observed Cases4Better than the National Benchmark
SSI - Colon Surgery0.411Better than the National Benchmark
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Lower Confidence Limit0.149No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Upper Confidence Limit2.932No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Number of Procedures245No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Predicted Cases2.254No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Observed Cases2No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy0.887No Different than National Benchmark
MRSA Bacteremia: Lower Confidence Limit0.330No Different than National Benchmark
MRSA Bacteremia: Upper Confidence Limit1.494No Different than National Benchmark
MRSA Bacteremia: Patient Days140669No Different than National Benchmark
MRSA Bacteremia: Predicted Cases9.269No Different than National Benchmark
MRSA Bacteremia: Observed Cases7No Different than National Benchmark
MRSA Bacteremia0.755No Different than National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Lower Confidence Limit0.207Better than the National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Upper Confidence Limit0.500Better than the National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Patient Days129239Better than the National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Predicted Cases60.627Better than the National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Observed Cases20Better than the National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff)0.330Better than the National Benchmark

How to read this: "Better than national" means the hospital's infection rate is statistically significantly lower than the national average — a sign of strong infection-control protocols (hand hygiene, sterilization, catheter management). "Worse than national" may warrant asking the hospital about their improvement initiatives.

Infection data reported to the CDC's National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN).

Complications & Deaths

CMS tracks post-surgical complications and mortality rates for common procedures and conditions (heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, hip/knee replacement, and more). These measures reflect how patients actually fare at this hospital compared to the national average.

MeasureScorePatientsvs. National
Rate of complications for hip/knee replacement patientsN/AN/ANumber of Cases Too Small
Hybrid Hospital-Wide All-Cause Risk Standardized Mortality Rate41,339No Different Than the National Rate
Death rate for heart attack patients13.6189No Different Than the National Rate
Death rate for CABG surgery patients3139No Different Than the National Rate
Death rate for COPD patients10.2129No Different Than the National Rate
Death rate for heart failure patients12.4305No Different Than the National Rate
Death rate for pneumonia patients16.1285No Different Than the National Rate
Death rate for stroke patients16.877No Different Than the National Rate
Pressure ulcer rate0.435,834No Different Than the National Rate
Death rate among surgical inpatients with serious treatable complications255.8194Worse Than the National Rate
Iatrogenic pneumothorax rate0.156,223No Different Than the National Rate
In-hospital fall-associated fracture rate0.406,312No Different Than the National Rate
Postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma rate2.071,890No Different Than the National Rate
Postoperative acute kidney injury requiring dialysis rate1.47305No Different Than the National Rate
Postoperative respiratory failure rate14.58287No Different Than the National Rate
Perioperative pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis rate3.172,028No Different Than the National Rate
Postoperative sepsis rate5.65268No Different Than the National Rate
Postoperative wound dehiscence rate2.04463No Different Than the National Rate
Abdominopelvic accidental puncture or laceration rate1.581,399No Different Than the National Rate
CMS Medicare PSI 90: Patient safety and adverse events composite1.09N/ANo Different Than the National Value

What to consider: A "worse than national" rating on mortality or complications is a serious signal — particularly for elective procedures where you have time to choose a facility. For emergency care, proximity and speed often outweigh these metrics. Ask the hospital about their outcomes for your specific procedure.

Readmissions & Unplanned Hospital Visits

A readmission means a patient returned to the hospital within 30 days of discharge. High readmission rates can signal gaps in discharge planning, patient education, or follow-up care coordination. CMS penalizes hospitals with excess readmissions through the HRRP.

MeasureScorePatientsvs. National
Hospital return days for heart attack patients11.3194Average Days per 100 Discharges
Hospital return days for heart failure patients46.4327More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
Hospital return days for pneumonia patients8297Average Days per 100 Discharges
Hybrid Hospital-Wide All-Cause Readmission Measure (HWR)14.62,264No Different Than the National Rate
Rate of unplanned hospital visits after colonoscopy (per 1,000 colonoscopies)13.6698No Different Than the National Rate
Rate of inpatient admissions for patients receiving outpatient chemotherapy12.9153No Different Than the National Rate
Rate of emergency department (ED) visits for patients receiving outpatient chemotherapy5.7153No Different Than the National Rate
Ratio of unplanned hospital visits after hospital outpatient surgery1.2316No Different than expected
Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) 30-Day Readmission Rate13.3194No Different Than the National Rate
Rate of readmission for CABG11.5134No Different Than the National Rate
Rate of readmission for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients19.1137No Different Than the National Rate
Heart failure (HF) 30-Day Readmission Rate20.7327No Different Than the National Rate
Rate of readmission after hip/knee replacementN/A0Number of Cases Too Small
Pneumonia (PN) 30-Day Readmission Rate15.6297No Different Than the National Rate

What to ask: If this hospital has higher-than-average readmission rates, ask about their discharge process — do they provide follow-up appointments, medication reconciliation, and clear care instructions before you leave?

Nearby Hospitals

If University Medical Center isn't in your Medicare plan's network — or you want to compare quality ratings before a procedure — these are the closest alternatives within 15 miles:

Covenant Medical Center

1 miles
★★☆☆☆ 2/5
Lubbock, TX · 470 beds

Covenant Childrens Hospital

1.4 miles
Not Rated N/A
Lubbock, TX · 212 beds

Lubbock Heart Hospital Lp

1.8 miles
★★☆☆☆ 2/5
Lubbock, TX · 74 beds

Oceans Behavioral Hospital Of Lubbock

1.9 miles
Not Rated N/A
Lubbock, TX · 32 beds

Grace Surgical Hospital

3 miles
★★★☆☆ 3/5
Lubbock, TX · 123 beds

Starcare Specialty Health /Sunrise Canyon Hospital

4.8 miles
Not Rated N/A
Lubbock, TX · 30 beds

Exceptional Community Hospital Lubbock

5.2 miles
Not Rated N/A
Lubbock, TX · 7 beds

View all hospitals near 79415, TX →

Switching hospitals may mean switching plans. Check the Medicare enrollment timeline to make sure you don't miss your window, and use our enrollment checklist to stay organized.

Location & Directions

Address: 602 Indiana Avenue, Lubbock, TX 79415
Phone: (806) 775-8200

Get directions on Google Maps →

What to Do with This Information

Hospital quality data is most useful when paired with your specific situation. Here's how to act on it:

  • Check network status: Before choosing this hospital, verify it's in-network for your Medicare Advantage plan. Out-of-network care can cost significantly more.
  • Ask about specific outcomes: If you're considering an elective procedure, ask the hospital for their outcomes data on that specific surgery — not just overall ratings.
  • Compare nearby options: Use the nearby hospitals section above to compare quality scores across facilities in the area.
  • Review your Medicare plan: Your plan's network determines which hospitals you can access affordably. Use our enrollment checklist to stay organized if you're switching plans. Check enrollment deadlines →
  • Talk to your doctor: Ask your primary care physician which hospitals they're affiliated with and whether they're in-network for your plan. Print our doctor questions checklist →
View on Medicare.gov Compare Medicare Plans in 79415, TX →

University Medical Center: Common Questions

What does a 3-star rating mean for University Medical Center?

CMS rates hospitals on a 1-to-5 star scale based on quality measures across mortality, safety, readmission, patient experience, and timely care. A 3-star rating means this hospital meets the national average across these domains. The rating is updated quarterly by CMS.

Does University Medical Center have an emergency room?

Yes, University Medical Center operates an emergency department.

How many doctors are affiliated with University Medical Center?

659 physicians are affiliated with this hospital according to CMS Physician Compare data. This includes 78 surgeons.

Does University Medical Center accept Medicare?

Yes. All hospitals listed on Medicare Hospital Compare are Medicare-certified facilities. However, whether this hospital is in-network for your specific Medicare Advantage plan depends on your plan's provider network. Check your plan documents or call your insurer to verify.

How many beds does University Medical Center have?

University Medical Center has 503 licensed beds. Bed count is an indicator of hospital capacity — larger hospitals often offer more specialized services.

Where does the data on this page come from?

All data is sourced from official CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) databases: Hospital Compare for quality measures and star ratings, Provider of Services for beds and services, and Physician Compare for doctor affiliations. Data is updated quarterly. Read our full methodology →

About the Reviewer

Wes Ward

Wes Ward

Founder & Data Lead

Wes Ward is the founder of InsuranceDataNow.org and reviews all hospital quality data and methodology for accuracy. Every hospital profile — including the CMS quality measures, infection rates, and doctor affiliations on this page — goes through his data-validation pipeline before publication.

With 25+ years in data analytics — including work with highly regulated genomic data at Ancestry.com — Wes brings enterprise-level rigor to healthcare transparency. He is also a co-founder of BestNeighborhood.org, CrimeGrade.org, and ISPReports.org.

View full profile →LinkedIn

Data sources: CMS Hospital Compare (February 2026), Provider of Services (Q4 2025), CMS Physician Compare, CDC NHSN. This page is for informational purposes only. Always verify information directly with the hospital. Read our full methodology →

Medicare Resources

Hospital quality data is just one piece of the Medicare puzzle. Explore our guides to make the best decisions for your coverage:

Does your Medicare plan cover University Medical Center?

Compare Plans in 79415, TX →